Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local session
-
DeliveryInvoke Windows Installer with crafted input
-
ExploitTrigger stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121)
-
ExecutionOverwrite stack / hijack control flow
-
ImpactExecute code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold an authenticated low-privileged local account on the target Windows host (AV:L, PR:L) - there is no remote or network-reachable path and no user interaction by a victim is needed (UI:N). The attacker must locally interact with the Windows Installer service/component to supply the overflowing input. The High attack complexity (AC:H) indicates a meaningful limiting factor beyond mere access - typically a race condition or a specific, attacker-influenced-but-not-fully-controlled system state that must be met for the stack overflow to be reliably triggered. Realistic risk is therefore concentrated on multi-user or shared systems (terminal servers, RDS hosts, shared workstations) where untrusted standard users coexist; on single-user endpoints the bug principally aids privilege escalation after an initial compromise. The specific feature flag, MSI operation, or configuration that supplies the vulnerable input is not detailed in the available NVD/EUVD description and would need confirmation from the Microsoft MSRC advisory. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0 is driven by total technical impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) but tempered by a local attack vector (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), and a requirement for pre-existing low privileges (PR:L) - meaning the attacker must already have a foothold on the host and win a non-trivial condition (likely a race or specific state) to succeed. All exploitation-maturity signals point the same, consistent direction toward lower urgency: it is NOT on the CISA KEV list, SSVC explicitly records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced. The only signal elevating concern is SSVC Technical Impact: total, which aligns with the CVSS 'total' impact triad. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed - this is a genuine data gap, not a low-risk confirmation. The signals are coherent (no contradictions between CVSS, SSVC, and KEV/POC status): this reads as a classic local elevation-of-privilege (EoP) bug useful as a post-compromise chaining step, not a remotely wormable threat. Prioritize via normal Patch Tuesday cadence, with faster remediation on multi-user, terminal-server, or shared hosts where untrusted low-privileged users exist. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, stolen credentials, or a prior exploit) invokes Windows Installer in a way that triggers the stack-based buffer overflow, corrupting the stack to execute code at a higher privilege level (SYSTEM). Because attack complexity is High, success likely depends on winning a race condition or achieving a specific system state rather than a single deterministic action, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
A stack-based buffer overflow in the Windows Installer (msiexec) component allows an authenticated attacker holding a low-privileged local account to elevate privileges to SYSTEM on affected Windows hosts. The flaw is local-only (AV:L) and requires no victim interaction, but carries High attack complexity (AC:H), meaning a race condition or a specific system state must be won before the overflow can be reliably triggered, which limits practical exploitability to shared and multi-user systems such as RDS/terminal servers rather than typical single-user endpoints. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and no active exploitation is confirmed (CISA SSVC exploitation: none); the high EPSS-style urgency signals are absent, and Microsoft has released a vendor patch, making this a genuine but moderate-priority issue that should be handled through normal patch cycles.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published a fix via the MSRC update guide for CVE-2026-83708 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83708), and the EUVD affected-version data identifies the fixed build levels per platform - for example Windows 11 23H2 at 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 at 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2019 at 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2016 at 10.0.14393.9612, and Windows 10 21H2/22H2 at 10.0.19044.7807 - so remediation consists of applying the current monthly cumulative update via Windows Update, WSUS, or Microsoft Update Catalog and verifying the reported build meets or exceeds those thresholds. Until patching completes, compensating controls should focus on reducing the population of unprivileged local users who can reach the installer: remove standard accounts from local Administrators and from any group with MSI install or repair rights, and use AppLocker or WDAC to restrict execution of msiexec.exe and MSI package installation to trusted administrative contexts (trade-off: legitimate user-driven installations and self-service software deployment break and must be routed through a managed deployment channel). Where the Windows Installer service is not operationally required, disabling it via the 'Windows Installer' service policy and the 'DisableMSI' registry setting blocks the vulnerable code path entirely, at the cost of breaking application install, repair, update, and uninstall operations. On shared hosts such as RDS servers, terminal servers, and multi-session workstations, additionally restrict Remote Desktop logon rights to vetted users and audit for unexpected token elevation, since that environment is where the AC:H trigger is most realistically achievable. No public exploit code has been identified, so these hardening steps can be scheduled rather than applied as an emergency break-glass measure.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a classic stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow) in the Windows Installer service, the component responsible for interpreting and executing MSI installation packages and related installation transactions. In this defect class, input supplied to the installer is copied into a fixed-length stack buffer without adequate bounds validation, allowing the attacker-controlled data to overwrite adjacent stack memory, including saved return addresses and control data, and in a privileged service context this can pivot to arbitrary code execution at a higher integrity level. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the attacker needs local access and an existing low-privileged account (PR:L implies authenticated access) while no user interaction is required (UI:N); the High complexity rating indicates an additional hurdle, typically timing or a particular installer state, must be satisfied rather than a simple deterministic trigger. The impact is scoped (S:U) but total on confidentiality, integrity, and availability once the overflow succeeds, matching the Windows privilege-escalation pattern of converting a standard user token into SYSTEM. The precise MSI operation, installer feature flag, or configuration parameter that supplies the vulnerable input is not described in the available NVD/EUVD metadata and would need to be confirmed from the Microsoft MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83708.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only EoP requiring an existing low-privileged account (AV:L, PR:L); AC:H reflects a likely race/state precondition; successful SYSTEM-level code execution yields full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity vulnerability in the Windows Installer (msiexec) component could allow a local attacker to gain SYSTEM-level privileges on Windows hosts. The greatest risk is to shared multi-user systems such as RDS or terminal servers, where a successful exploit could give attackers full control and enable further compromise. While no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified, organizations should apply the vendor patch through normal patch cycles, prioritizing these multi-user environments.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99340
GHSA-cx7w-cw4m-59g3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB