Skip to main content

Windows Win32K CVE-2026-83566

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99916 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-gm8q-ggp2-97xw
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local code execution
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable Win32K ICOMP path
  3. Exploit
    Win use-after-free race condition
  4. Execution
    Corrupt and reclaim freed kernel object
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must already have the ability to run code as a low-privileged authenticated local user on the target Windows system (PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or network vector. Exploitation specifically requires reaching the vulnerable Win32K ICOMP code path and winning a use-after-free race condition, which the CVSS high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates is timing-dependent and not reliably repeatable on the first attempt. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors: the local-only vector means it cannot be used for initial access and is only useful as a post-exploitation privilege-escalation step; the AC:H race requirement and the availability of a vendor patch further reduce realistic risk on patched or hardened systems.

Impact

This is a local, authenticated elevation-of-privilege flaw in the Windows Win32K (ICOMP) kernel component, a CWE-416 use-after-free. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 HIGH) signals that an attacker must already have local code execution with low privileges and must win a timing/race condition (AC:H) to achieve full compromise of the host (C:H/I:H/A:H). The signals are internally consistent and point to moderate, not critical, urgency: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no', which aligns with the AC:H race requirement, even though Technical Impact is rated 'total'. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were provided, so there is no evidence of in-the-wild use. The realistic risk is that of a post-compromise privilege-escalation primitive (e.g., sandbox escape or local admin/SYSTEM from a low-priv foothold) rather than an initial-access or remotely-wormable threat. Note a minor conflict: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service', but the description and CVSS (I:H) describe privilege elevation and integrity impact, not merely DoS - the A:H impact makes DoS a plausible secondary outcome, so treat DoS as secondary to EoP.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host - for example via a phishing payload, a compromised standard user account, or a browser sandbox foothold - triggers the use-after-free in the Win32K ICOMP component by repeatedly invoking the vulnerable kernel path to win a race condition. Successful exploitation corrupts kernel memory and lets the attacker execute code with SYSTEM privileges, fully compromising the machine. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) makes reliable exploitation non-trivial.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Win32K ICOMP subsystem allows an authenticated attacker holding only low-privilege local code execution to elevate to kernel/SYSTEM context by triggering a use-after-free (CWE-416) in a Win32K object-lifetime code path. The flaw is confined to local access (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.0) and requires winning a timing-dependent race, so it cannot be used for initial access or remote compromise and is only meaningful as a post-exploitation escalation step. CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; Microsoft has released a vendor patch.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published a fix for this issue (reported by secure@microsoft.com), and the EUVD-published affected ranges indicate the fixed build thresholds as 10.0.26200.9711 or later for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.26100.9711 or later for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26300.9711 or later for Windows 11 26H2, 10.0.28000.3231 or later for Windows 11 26H1, and 10.0.26100.33650 or later for Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) - install the latest cumulative update from the Microsoft Security Update Guide advisory (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83566) and reboot, since win32k is loaded as a kernel driver and the fix only takes effect after restart. No public exploit code is known, so patch urgency is driven by the high technical impact (SSVC Technical Impact: total) rather than by observed attacks; nonetheless, prioritize internet-exposed multi-user hosts and RDP/terminal-server or VDI estates where many low-privileged sessions coexist, because PR:L is trivially satisfied there. There is no configuration switch that removes Win32K ICOMP from the reachable surface, so if immediate patching is impossible the only meaningful compensating controls are reducing the pool of untrusted local users and code (restrict interactive/RDP logon to trusted accounts, tighten local admin group membership, enforce WDAC/AppLocker or ASR rules to block untrusted binaries and script hosts that could carry an exploit payload, and enable LSA protection/Credential Guard so that a successful kernel escalation is harder to monetize) - each of these is a defense-in-depth measure with the trade-off of operational friction and possible application compatibility breakage, and none eliminates the underlying use-after-free. Monitor for unexpected SYSTEM-level process or token creation from interactive sessions as a detection signal, and re-check advisories in case exploit code is published later, since the local, authentication-gated prerequisites make weaponized proof-of-concept code a realistic future development.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231

Affected Packages

euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 6 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Win32K is the kernel-mode component of Windows that implements the GDI, USER and window-manager surface (win32k.sys and its win32kbase/win32kfull derivatives), and it is a long-standing target for local privilege escalation because it exposes a large, complex object model to user-mode callers. The ICOMP subcomponent handles input/composition-related Win32K objects, and the root cause here is CWE-416 Use After Free: a kernel object is released while a stale reference to it remains reachable, so a subsequent use dereferences freed pool memory. In kernel context that yields memory corruption that an attacker who can deterministically shape the freed allocation may convert into controlled kernel memory access, and from there into token or process-attribute tampering for privilege elevation. Exploitation is gated by two hard preconditions from the assessed vector: PR:L means the adversary must already be running as a low-privileged authenticated local user, and AC:H reflects that the free/reuse window is timing-dependent, making reliable exploitation difficult and non-deterministic on a single attempt. The CVSS scope is unchanged (S:U) and Confidentiality/Integrity/Availability impacts are all High (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with kernel-level read/write and potential system instability or denial of service.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only kernel UAF reachable by a low-priv user (AV:L/PR:L), requiring a race win (AC:H), yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C/I/A:H) within the same OS scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Win32K - ICOMP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows contains a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-83566) in the Win32K ICOMP subsystem that allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege local access to gain SYSTEM-level control. While the flaw requires a timing-dependent race condition and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, successful exploitation could enable full system compromise and lateral movement, making timely patching essential for organizations with Windows endpoints.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Win32K is a core component of every supported Windows desktop and server edition
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy