Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-81941

| EUVDEUVD-2026-75780 HIGH
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-09-10 ibm GHSA-m5q4-pf3r-r78g
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as non-admin Langflow user
  2. Delivery
    Open flow editor, add MCP Tools component
  3. Exploit
    Configure local stdio subprocess transport with attacker-controlled command
  4. Execution
    Execute flow to trigger server-side subprocess spawn
  5. Persist
    Harvest process environment variables (API keys, credentials)
  6. Impact
    Pivot to internal services reachable from server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session as any non-administrative Langflow user (CVSS PR:L confirmed). The user must have permission to create or edit flows - this is standard, non-privileged core functionality in Langflow, not a separately gated capability. The MCP Tools component must be accessible in the component palette. Critically, two server-side enforcement flags that administrators may have enabled specifically to prevent this class of access - LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS - are both bypassed by the MCP Tools stdio transport path and do NOT limit exploitation. What limits exploitation: a valid account is required (no unauthenticated/anonymous path); the target must be IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.11.5; environments where flow creation is restricted exclusively to administrators eliminate the non-admin attack surface entirely.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the exploitation profile: network-reachable via the Langflow web interface, low complexity, requiring only a valid non-admin account, with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the server. No EPSS data was provided in the input and no KEV or POC status is confirmed. Despite the absence of public exploit code, the technique is conceptually straightforward - flow construction is core product functionality, and the bypass of two explicit security controls suggests the MCP Tools pathway was not included in the threat model during control implementation. Real-world risk is highest in multi-tenant or SaaS-style deployments where non-admin accounts belong to external or partially trusted users; single-operator instances where all authenticated users are already implicitly trusted present lower practical risk. The sensitivity of AI workflow servers - which routinely hold API keys, model credentials, and database connection strings in their process environment - elevates the consequence of any successful exploitation significantly.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding a valid non-admin Langflow account - such as a developer, analyst, or external collaborator seat in a shared enterprise instance - opens the flow editor, adds an MCP Tools component, and configures its transport to a local stdio subprocess invoking a shell or script of their choice. When the flow is executed, the Langflow server spawns the subprocess under its own OS credentials, returning output to the flow and allowing the attacker to exfiltrate environment variables containing API keys, database passwords, or cloud IAM tokens, then pivot to internal services reachable from the server. No administrative privileges, special platform knowledge, or prior reconnaissance beyond basic Langflow usage is required.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026

Authenticated non-administrative users in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.11.5 can execute arbitrary OS commands at the application process privilege level by constructing a flow that uses an MCP Tools component configured with a local stdio subprocess transport. This attack path explicitly circumvents both the LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS server-side enforcement controls - meaning deployments that relied on these flags for protection are not protected against this specific vector. Full exploitation enables credential theft from the process environment, file system tampering, and lateral movement to backend services reachable from the server. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the low entry bar (any authenticated account) makes this a high-priority patch for multi-tenant or shared Langflow deployments.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch documented in the IBM security advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666. The input data confirms a patch is available from IBM but does not specify the exact fixed version number - administrators must consult the advisory directly to identify the minimum patched release and upgrade as soon as possible. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict flow creation and editing permissions to trusted administrative users only, which eliminates the non-admin attack surface entirely at the cost of disrupting normal end-user workflows. Additionally, ensure the Langflow application process runs under a minimal OS user account with least-privilege filesystem permissions and no unneeded network routes to internal services, limiting the blast radius of any successful exploitation to the process's own credential scope. Note that the two server-side flags LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS do NOT mitigate this specific attack path and should not be relied upon as compensating controls for this CVE.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.11.5

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM Langflow OSS is a visual AI workflow orchestration platform built atop the upstream open-source Langflow project, where users wire together functional components into executable 'flows.' The MCP (Model Context Protocol) Tools component supports multiple transport backends; the local stdio subprocess transport causes the Langflow server to spawn a native OS subprocess under its own process credentials. Affected products are confirmed by CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* spanning versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5. The root cause is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): two distinct server-side guards - LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY (intended to restrict custom component creation to admins) and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS (intended to block code-execution components for non-admins) - are both bypassable via the MCP Tools component code path, which was not covered by either enforcement mechanism.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-accessible via web UI, low complexity; PR:L because a valid non-admin account is required; full CIA impact on the server process matches credential theft, file modification, and availability disruption described.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an authenticated non-administrative user could execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server at the privilege level of the application process by constructing a flow with an MCP Tools component configured to use a local stdio subprocess transport. This bypasses both the LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS server-side controls intended to prevent exactly this class of access. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary command execution, sensitive data exposure (including credentials from the process environment), file system modification, and lateral movement to services reachable from the server.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Authenticated users in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0-1.11.5 can execute arbitrary operating system commands at the application's privilege level, potentially compromising credentials, files, and connected backend systems. This vulnerability explicitly bypasses the built-in security controls intended to prevent code execution, making it critical for any organization running multi-tenant or shared Langflow deployments.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Interim mitigation: fully disable MCP Tools functionality or restrict Langflow access to administrators only until patching is complete; enable process and network monitoring on the Langflow server to detect suspicious command execution patterns.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 46% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular AI workflow builder, concentrated in enterprise AI/ML teams
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy