Skip to main content

HPE NonStop CVE-2026-79831

| EUVDEUVD-2026-102002 MEDIUM
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-15 hpe GHSA-5wpv-46m6-vrc3
6.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local account
  2. Delivery
    Invoke Posix User Threads with crafted input
  3. Exploit
    Overflow heap buffer (CWE-122)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt adjacent heap metadata
  5. Impact
    Execute code in component context / crash subsystem

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires pre-existing local access to the HPE NonStop system with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) and the ability to invoke the Posix User Threads (pthread) functionality with attacker-controlled input that triggers the heap buffer overflow; no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no non-default configuration is indicated by the description. Limiting factors: the attack vector is strictly local (AV:L), so the attacker must already be authenticated on the host - there is no remote or network-facing exposure, and exploitation is confined to the privilege context of the affected threading component rather than yielding inherent full-system compromise.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H) scores 6.6 (Medium) and describes a locally-exploitable flaw requiring low-level privileges and no user interaction - i.e., an already-authenticated local user on an HPE NonStop system. This is NOT a remotely-reachable, internet-facing vulnerability, which substantially lowers real-world urgency compared to its 'arbitrary code execution' framing. No EPSS score was provided, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept was identified, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. The only disclosure source is an HPE security bulletin (HPESBNS05148), meaning this is vendor-reported with no independent corroboration of exploitation. A notable internal tension exists: the description claims 'arbitrary code execution' (which normally implies High confidentiality/integrity impact), yet the vendor assigned only C:L/I:L/A:H - suggesting the code execution is constrained to the context/privileges of the affected Posix User Threads component rather than full system takeover. Overall this is a credible but lower-priority local privilege/availability issue against a niche platform, not a mass-exploitation threat; patch on a normal cycle unless the NonStop host carries high-value fault-tolerant workloads (banking/telecom), in which case prioritize given the platform's typical criticality.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged local account (or has compromised a low-privileged process) on an HPE NonStop system invokes the vulnerable Posix User Threads functionality with crafted input that overflows a heap buffer, corrupting adjacent heap structures. Successful exploitation crashes the affected process or threading subsystem (A:H) and may allow execution of attacker-controlled code within the component's context. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires pre-existing local access.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 15, 2026

Arbitrary code execution is possible in HPE NonStop Posix User Threads for an authenticated local user with low-level privileges who supplies crafted input to the pthread functionality, due to a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122). The flaw requires pre-existing local access (AV:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and no non-default configuration indicated by the available data; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vendor advisory is at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbns05148en_us&docLocale=en_US, and the independent assessment rates confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact as High despite the vendor's 6.6 Medium base score with Low/Low/High impact.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the provided data, so apply the HPE advisory guidance at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbns05148en_us&docLocale=en_US and any vendor-supplied hotfix or patch for the NonStop Posix User Threads component; confirm patch availability directly with HPE support. If a patch is not yet deployed, restrict local interactive and batch access to trusted, least-privileged accounts, since exploitation requires pre-existing local access and low-level privileges; review applications that pass untrusted or externally influenced input into pthread APIs and gate, sanitize, or avoid such input where feasible. Monitor for abnormal thread-related process crashes, core dumps, or privilege changes on NonStop systems. Limiting local accounts or pthread-based workflows may disrupt developer or batch operations, so coordinate with application owners before enforcing restrictions, and treat the HPE advisory as the definitive remediation source.

Affected VersionsENISA

HPE NonStop Posix User Threads T1280L02^ACG and earlier

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in HPE NonStop's Posix User Threads implementation, a POSIX pthread-compatible threading library for the NonStop fault-tolerant operating system. CWE-122 describes a write beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer, which can corrupt heap metadata or adjacent objects and potentially lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the affected process. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hewlett_packard_enterprise:hpe_nonstop_posix_user_threads:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the product family with a wildcard version, so exact NonStop OS release mappings must be confirmed via HPE's advisory. Exploitation is local (AV:L), requires low privileges (PR:L), and needs no user interaction (UI:N); the attacker must be able to invoke pthread-related functionality with attacker-controlled input. The vendor vector scores C:L/I:L/A:H, while the independent assessment raises confidentiality and integrity to High (C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating the flaw may be more impactful than the vendor's base score suggests, though exploitation remains confined to the privilege context of the threading component rather than inherent full-system compromise.

Know when Hpe Nonstop Posix User Threads gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 6.6 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local access with low privileges and no interaction (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N); assessed C/I/A as High because stated arbitrary code execution implies full impact within the component context, diverging from vendor's C:L/I:L.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A heap buffer overflow in HPE NonStop Posix User Threads may allow arbitrary code execution.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
HPE NonStop is a niche fault-tolerant platform, limited to specialized enterprise deployments
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +33
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy