Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach router service interface over network
-
DeliverySend crafted request to vulnerable endpoint
-
ExploitInject code via unsanitized input (CWE-94)
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code on device
-
ImpactGain full control of router
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), no authentication, no user interaction, and no elevated privileges are required - remote code execution is achievable against the SK-WR6640X AX1800M firmware V1.0.3, consistent with the 'unauthorized RCE' disclosure. The practical limiting factor is network reachability to the vulnerable service: exploitation requires the attacker to reach the router's management or service interface, which on most home deployments is LAN-facing by default and only exposed to the internet if remote administration or a port-forward is enabled. The description does not name the specific vulnerable endpoint, protocol, or feature, so the precise reachable surface should be confirmed against the device configuration. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) rates this 9.8 Critical, describing trivially-reachable, unauthenticated, network-based remote code execution with total impact on the device - the worst-case profile on paper. However, the exploitation-probability signals are modest: EPSS is only 0.24% (14th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and there is no confirmation of active exploitation. A public technical disclosure exists (PRISMI-Team 'unauthorized-rce.md' writeup), which raises the practical likelihood of working exploit code circulating, but a PoC is a distinct signal from in-the-wild use. The key tension: a maximal CVSS paired with low EPSS and no KEV typically means the flaw is genuinely dangerous per-device but has limited mass-exploitation evidence so far - consistent with a niche consumer router rather than an internet-scale target. Net: treat as a high priority for anyone operating this specific Skyworth model (unauthenticated RCE is not deferrable), but it is not yet a confirmed widespread-exploitation emergency. Note also the CPE is a placeholder ('cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a'), so automated affected-product matching is unreliable - verify applicability against the exact model/firmware. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to the router's management/service interface sends crafted input to a vulnerable endpoint that fails to sanitize attacker-controlled data (CWE-94 code injection), causing arbitrary code to execute on the device without authentication or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N). A public technical writeup describing unauthorized RCE exists, lowering the effort required to reproduce the attack; successful exploitation yields full control of the router, enabling traffic interception, pivoting into the LAN, or botnet enrollment. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects the SKYWORTH SK-WR6640X (AX1800M) Wi-Fi 6 dual-band fiber router running firmware V1.0.3, allowing a network-reachable attacker to run arbitrary code with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact (CVSS 9.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). Because the name of the vulnerable endpoint, protocol or feature is not disclosed, the practical limiting factor is reachability rather than credentials: on typical home deployments the affected service is LAN-facing, and only internet-facing management, a port-forward, or an exposed management interface would place it within reach of a remote attacker. Assessment signals are mixed - a maximum-severity score and a public disclosure write-up from the PRISMI-Team coexist with a low EPSS of 0.24% (14th percentile), no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) status, and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis: the references contain no fixed firmware version, no vendor security advisory with an update path, and the CVE originates from a third-party disclosure, so owners should contact SKYWORTH through https://www.skyworthdigital.com/ or their ISP to request a fixed firmware build and monitor the PRISMI-Team disclosure at https://github.com/PRISMI-Team/VulnDisclos/blob/main/Routers/Skyworth/unauthorized-rce.md and the NVD entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78802 for updates. Until firmware is released, apply compensating controls targeted at the reachability prerequisite: disable WAN-side remote administration and any cloud/TR-069-style remote management, and disable UPnP so the device cannot auto-create port-forwards (trade-off: some ISP auto-provisioning and remote support features stop working), then verify from an external network that the management interface is not reachable on 80/443/8080 or vendor-specific ports (trade-off: none, this is purely verification). Segment the router from other network assets and restrict who can reach its LAN management address, since the disclosed flaw is described as unauthorized, i.e. requiring no credentials - restricting access to the management UI therefore removes the attacker's foothold rather than merely slowing them down. Because the vulnerable endpoint is not named, blanket-hardening the web interface is advisable, including changing default administrative credentials and disabling unused services; none of these controls are a substitute for a firmware fix, since the root cause is CWE-94 code injection inside the firmware itself.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'), meaning attacker-supplied input is assembled into code - on embedded router firmware typically a shell command built with system(), popen() or a configuration helper invoked from a management CGI, diagnostic, or update handler - and then executed by the device with root-level privileges. The impact vector is a classic pre-authentication network RCE on a consumer/ISP CPE device: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with high C/I/A. Detection support is weak from structured data alone: the supplied CPE string is a placeholder (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a) and the ENISA EUVD record (EUVD-2026-98887) lists the affected version as 'n/a n/a', so the only reliable version identifier is the vendor's stated firmware V1.0.3 for the SK-WR6640X AX1800M. The description and references do not name the vulnerable service or parameter, so analysts should treat the precise attack surface (LAN management interface versus WAN-exposed administration) as unconfirmed and validate it against the device configuration.
Know when Skyworth gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Disclosure describes unauthenticated remote RCE with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); code execution on the device yields full C/I/A impact with no cross-component scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
An issue in SKYWORTH DIGITAL CO.,LTD SK-WR6640X Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Band Fiber Router (AX1800M) V1.0.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
An issue in the directory /system/bin/blkid of Skyworth v3.0 allows attackers to perform a directory traversal via mount
Penguin Aurora TV Box 41502 is a high-end network HD set-top box produced by Tencent Video and Skyworth Digital. Rated c
EUVD-2026-98887
GHSA-wg49-7523-vxv3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB