Skip to main content

Arista EOS CVE-2026-73443

| EUVDEUVD-2026-80996 MEDIUM
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay (CWE-294)
2026-09-16 Arista GHSA-vq3p-3r98-j8w8
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: Arista
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain access to VRRP layer-2 segment
  2. Delivery
    Capture authenticated VRRPv2 advertisement
  3. Exploit
    Wait for or induce master failure
  4. Execution
    Replay stale advertisement indefinitely
  5. Impact
    Block backup failover, deny gateway service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Replay attack prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires the affected device to be running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP-AH authentication explicitly configured (a non-default hardening option) - the flaw does not exist without this feature enabled. The attacker must be unauthenticated but positioned within the same layer-2 network segment on which VRRP operates (AV:A adjacency), limiting exploitation to insiders, compromised local hosts, or attackers with VLAN/physical access. Impact is denial-of-service only: replayed advertisements suppress backup-router failover, denying gateway reachability; there is no confidentiality or integrity impact and no code execution.

Impact

This is a genuine but low-severity availability issue, and the vendor CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VA:L) is a fair characterization. The single most important limiting signal is the ADJACENT attack vector: the attacker must already have a foothold on the same layer-2 segment where VRRP is running, which sharply narrows the realistic attacker population to insiders, compromised hosts, or an attacker with physical/VLAN access. Confidentiality and integrity impacts are both None - this is purely a denial-of-service (VA:L) affecting hosts that rely on the virtual gateway. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept were provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; the flaw's value to an attacker is limited to disrupting gateway failover rather than gaining access. CWE-294 (capture-replay) is accurate - the root cause is that VRRPv2 IP-AH authentication lacks anti-replay protection, so captured advertisements remain valid indefinitely. Net: this is a legitimate low-to-moderate risk driven by the adjacency requirement and DoS-only impact, not a high-priority remotely-exploitable vulnerability, and it is further gated by a non-default authentication configuration.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on the same broadcast domain as the VRRP routers (e.g. via a compromised host or rogue port on the VLAN) passively captures a valid IP-AH-authenticated VRRPv2 advertisement from the master router. When the master fails, the attacker replays the captured advertisement to keep asserting stale master state, preventing the backup from taking over and denying gateway service to downstream hosts. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, but the technique requires only standard packet capture and replay tooling.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Denial of service in Arista EOS affects devices that have VRRPv2 with IP Authentication Header (IP-AH) authentication explicitly configured - a non-default hardening option, so exposure is limited to networks that opted into it. An unauthenticated attacker positioned on the same layer-2 segment as the VRRP group can passively capture a legitimate authenticated VRRP advertisement and replay it indefinitely, keeping a stale master state alive and preventing a backup router from taking over the virtual gateway; hosts relying on that gateway address then lose connectivity. Impact is availability-only (no confidentiality or integrity loss, no code execution), the assessed severity is low (CVSS 3.1 5.3, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/A:L), and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires layer-2 adjacency, which generally implies an insider, a compromised local host, or VLAN/physical access.

RemediationAI

Patch availability was not confirmed in the supplied data - the authoritative source is Arista Security Advisory 0157 (https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24713-security-advisory-0157), which should be consulted for the exact EOS releases that resolve the replay behaviour; per the precision rules above, no specific fix version is asserted here. Until a fixed release is installed, the most direct mitigation is to stop relying on VRRPv2 IP-AH: either remove AH authentication from the VRRPv2 group or migrate the group to VRRPv3, which does not support AH and is therefore not affected by this replay path - the trade-off is that plaintext VRRPv2 type-1 authentication is trivially forgeable and VRRPv3 has no cryptographic authentication at all, so any VRRP remains injectable by an on-segment attacker; the protocol's TTL=255 and IP protocol 112 sanity checks only raise the bar slightly. Because the attack surface is strictly layer-2 adjacency, the most reliable compensating control is segmentation and port-level hardening: prune VRRP VLANs away from user access ports, enforce port security / MAC limiting and DHCP snooping on access ports, and restrict which ports can carry the VRRP VLAN so that only trusted switch-to-switch links see advertisement traffic. These measures reduce but do not eliminate insider or compromised-host risk, and they add operational overhead in environments with unmanaged or daisy-chained switches. Monitoring for duplicate or repeated VRRP advertisement sequence/content across a group and alerting on unexpected ARP/MAC movement toward the virtual MAC can give early warning of replay. If neither patching nor migration is feasible, treating the virtual gateway as best-effort and providing alternate gateway redundancy (for example a second default gateway distributed via DHCP or an FHRP-free static route path) limits the blast radius of a successful suppression of failover.

Affected VersionsENISA

EOS 4.35.0 ≤4.35.5M
EOS 4.34.0 ≤4.34.7M
EOS 4.36.0 ≤4.36.1F
EOS 4.33.0 ≤4.33.9M

Affected Packages

euvd eos no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) elects a master router that owns a shared virtual IP/MAC, with backups taking over when advertisements stop. VRRPv2 (RFC 3768, obsoleted by VRRPv3 in RFC 5798) optionally supports authentication using IP Authentication Header (AH, RFC 4302) in addition to a deprecated plaintext type-1 password. The design weakness here is CWE-294, Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay: VRRPv2's AH-based authentication validates message integrity and origin but the protocol usage does not enforce a monotonic anti-replay sequence window tied to the VRRP state machine, so a replayed, still-valid authenticated advertisement is accepted as current. This is a protocol-level flaw rather than a memory-safety or injection bug - there is no code execution, no authentication bypass on the management plane, and no data disclosure. The affected CPE, cpe:2.3:a:arista_networks:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is version-agnostic in the supplied data, indicating the behaviour is a property of EOS's VRRPv2 IP-AH implementation across releases rather than a regression in a single build. Note that VRRPv3 dropped AH support, so the vulnerable configuration is specifically VRRPv2 plus IP-AH.

Know when Eos gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Arista) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Adjacent L2 access required (AV:A) and no auth needed to replay captured packets (PR:N); impact is limited gateway DoS only (A:L), with no confidentiality or integrity effect.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Arista).

CVSS VectorVendor: Arista

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Sep 16, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
4.7 (MEDIUM) 5.3 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

On affected platforms running Arista EOS with VRRPv2 IP-AH authentication configured, an unauthenticated attacker within the same layer 2 network segment on which VRRP is running can capture a legitimate authenticated VRRP advertisement and replay it indefinitely. Replayed advertisements can be used to advertise stale VRRP state, for example to prevent a backup router from taking over the virtual gateway after the original master has gone down, resulting in a denial of service for hosts using the virtual gateway address.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Arista EOS common in data-center/enterprise networking but not ubiquitous like Cisco
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

More in Eos

View all
CVE-2014-6271 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 24

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which

CVE-2014-7169 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 25

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of

CVE-2017-14491 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 04

Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execut

CVE-2024-6387 HIGH POC
8.1 Jul 01

Remote code execution in OpenSSH's sshd server (regression of CVE-2006-5051) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2026-7473 MEDIUM POC
6.9 Jun 05

Tunnel decapsulation logic in Arista EOS fails to verify the encapsulation protocol type, allowing any tunneled packet d

CVE-2026-73447 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Sep 16

Command injection in Arista EOS-based products lets an authenticated user of the gRPC Network Security Interface (gNSI)

CVE-2015-5165 CRITICAL
9.3 Aug 12

The C+ mode offload emulation in the RTL8139 network card device model in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.5.x and earlier, allows

CVE-2023-24509 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 13

On affected modular platforms running Arista EOS equipped with both redundant supervisor modules and having the redundan

CVE-2015-3209 HIGH
7.5 Jun 15

Heap-based buffer overflow in the PCNET controller in QEMU allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending

CVE-2015-8236 CRITICAL
10.0 Nov 19

Arista EOS before 4.11.12, 4.12 before 4.12.11, 4.13 before 4.13.14M, 4.14 before 4.14.5FX.5, and 4.15 before 4.15.0FX1.

CVE-2023-3646 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 29

On affected platforms running Arista EOS with mirroring to multiple destinations configured, an internal system error ma

CVE-2023-24511 HIGH POC
7.5 Apr 12

On affected platforms running Arista EOS with SNMP configured, a specially crafted packet can cause a memory leak in the

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy