Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify reachable stunnel service port
  2. Delivery
    Craft protocol input generating >1024-byte log message
  3. Exploit
    s_vlog calls vsnprintf against fixed 1024-byte stack buffer
  4. Execution
    Out-of-bounds stack read triggered
  5. Impact
    stunnel process crashes (DoS) or null bytes corrupt log buffer

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Network access to a stunnel service port is the primary prerequisite - stunnel must be reachable by the attacker, which is its normal deployment posture as a network proxy. The vulnerability activates when an attacker can cause stunnel to generate an internal log message exceeding 1024 bytes via the s_vlog/vsnprintf code path; this is triggered by sufficiently crafted protocol inputs on any proxied connection, with no authentication required (CVSS PR:N). The corner-case integrity impact (null byte replacement of trailing newlines) additionally requires a specific stack memory layout at time of exploitation, making it non-deterministic and difficult to reliably reproduce. Exploitation is limited to scenarios where the stunnel process is reachable over the network; if stunnel is bound to localhost or behind strict firewall rules, remote attack surface is eliminated. RHEL 6 systems are end-of-life and unlikely to receive patches, increasing risk on legacy deployments.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L) scores 6.5 Medium, reflecting network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation with limited impact. The attack complexity is low - no special conditions beyond crafting sufficiently verbose protocol inputs - which is a meaningful escalation factor. However, the bounded impact (no confidentiality loss, limited integrity and availability) constrains real-world severity. EPSS data was not provided in the source intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from available signals. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept was identified, suggesting opportunistic or widespread automated exploitation is not currently occurring. The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the source data hints at possible stack memory exposure via the out-of-bounds read, but the CVSS C:N assignment indicates no confirmed attacker-accessible exfiltration path. The corner-case integrity impact (null byte injection) is unlikely to be reliably weaponized. Net assessment: this is a moderate-priority remediation - real, remotely triggerable, but not a critical emergency in the absence of active exploitation signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with network connectivity to a stunnel-protected service sends crafted protocol inputs designed to trigger verbose internal logging - for example, excessively long connection metadata, protocol banners, or error-inducing payloads - causing the s_vlog function to format a log message exceeding 1024 bytes. This triggers the out-of-bounds stack read, crashing the stunnel process and interrupting TLS tunneling for all clients routed through it. No public proof-of-concept is known at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity (AC:L, no auth) means the trigger condition is straightforward to discover through fuzzing.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 04, 2026

Stack-based out-of-bounds read in stunnel's s_vlog logging function allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the service by sending protocol inputs that generate log messages exceeding 1024 bytes via vsnprintf. The primary impact is service disruption (availability), with a limited integrity impact in corner cases where trailing newline characters in the stack buffer can be overwritten with null bytes. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

RemediationAI

Consult the Red Hat security advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70368 for vendor-released patched package versions; no specific fixed version number was confirmed in the available intelligence at time of analysis. Apply available RHEL errata updates for the stunnel package via standard package management (yum/dnf). As a compensating control, restrict network-level access to stunnel service ports using firewall rules or security groups to limit the attacker surface to trusted hosts only - this does not eliminate the vulnerability but reduces exposure. Additionally, reducing stunnel log verbosity (if configurable) to minimize the likelihood of generating log messages exceeding 1024 bytes may reduce exploitability in practice, though the trade-off is reduced diagnostic visibility. Monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2462029 for patch status updates.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

stunnel is a widely used open-source TLS tunneling proxy that wraps non-TLS protocols in SSL/TLS. The vulnerable code path is within the s_vlog internal logging function, which uses vsnprintf to format log messages into a fixed-size stack buffer (1024 bytes). CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) describes the root cause: when the formatted log message exceeds the buffer boundary, the read operation extends past the allocated stack region. This is distinct from a write overflow - the attacker cannot directly overwrite arbitrary memory for code execution, but can trigger an abnormal read that crashes the process or, in specific stack-layout conditions, cause trailing newline (\n) characters to be replaced with null bytes (\0), potentially corrupting log output integrity. The CPE strings confirm affected scope is stunnel as packaged and distributed within Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable, no authentication required per stunnel's role as a public proxy; impact bounded to limited integrity (null byte corner case) and availability (crash); no confirmed attacker-readable data exfiltration path.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

A stack-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the "s_vlog" function of stunnel, when handling oversized log messages via "vsnprintf". A remote attacker with network access to a stunnel service can send protocol inputs that trigger a log message longer than 1024 bytes, leading to an out-of-bounds stack read and a potential crash. In certain corner cases, the same vulnerability could be used to replace a series of trailing "\n" characters with "\0".

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used TLS proxy on Linux, common in enterprise and legacy deployments
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment MSRC Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy