Skip to main content

Windows Storage Spaces CVE-2026-70238

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99612 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-c232-j64q-qf36
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Invoke Storage Spaces Controller interface
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory to run code as SYSTEM
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already possess authenticated low-privileged local access to the Windows host (PR:L, AV:L); it cannot be triggered remotely or over a network. Exploitation targets the Storage Spaces Controller component, which is present by default across affected Windows client and server editions, so no special non-default feature toggle is indicated by the description. The principal limiting factor is the local-access prerequisite: the attacker needs an existing foothold or valid local credentials, which confines this to post-compromise privilege escalation rather than initial access. Affected builds are below the patched versions enumerated in EUVD (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 < 10.0.26100.9711, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.33650); patched hosts are not exploitable.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-priority vulnerability. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 (High) derives from a fully local attack vector (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), and low privileges required (PR:L) with no user interaction, yielding total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) of the host upon successful exploitation. These signals are internally consistent - an authorized local user escalating to SYSTEM. Critically, the risk-reduction signals point away from urgency: there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, and CISA's SSVC framework explicitly rates Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (consistent with a local-only, non-wormable EoP), while rating Technical Impact as 'total' (consistent with the C:H/I:H/A:H vector). No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood could not be weighed. The practical takeaway: because exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated local access, this is a privilege-escalation building block used after initial compromise rather than an initial-access or remotely-wormable threat. It should be patched on standard cadence (prioritized on shared/multi-user and high-value hosts) rather than treated as a drop-everything emergency, absent any evidence of active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged authenticated access to a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, stolen credentials, or a prior foothold) runs a crafted program that triggers the heap-based buffer overflow in the Storage Spaces Controller to corrupt kernel/service memory and elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction is required, but local access is a prerequisite. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code was identified at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Storage Spaces Controller lets an authenticated low-privileged user corrupt kernel heap memory and gain execution at SYSTEM level, because the component fails to bounds-check attacker-influenced data (CVSS 7.8, CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The affected surface is the Storage Spaces Controller present by default across Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012/2012 R2/2016/2019/2022/2025, including Server Core installations; patched builds (for example Windows 11 24H2 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33650) are not exploitable. Exploitation is confined to a post-compromise scenario requiring an existing local foothold or valid low-privileged credentials, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' and automatable exploitation as 'no', and the independent assessment rates this as credible but not emergency-priority.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update that corresponds to your build, which is available per the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70238 (Vendor-released patch; fixed build thresholds per EUVD include 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 respectively). Because the flaw requires an authenticated local attacker (PR:L, AV:L), the highest-value compensating control is reducing who can obtain a local foothold and what privilege they hold: enforce least privilege so no unnecessary accounts have interactive logon or administrative rights on affected hosts, tier administrative credentials so a compromised standard user cannot move laterally, and restrict interactive/RDP logon to Storage Spaces and server-management hosts to trusted operators. There is no practical configuration toggle to disable the vulnerable controller on hosts that actually use storage pools, and doing so would break pool and virtual-disk management; on hosts that do not use Storage Spaces, disabling or not installing the feature where the platform permits reduces exposed surface but has the side effect of removing storage virtualization functionality and is not a substitute for patching. Detection should focus on post-exploitation behaviour - unexpected SYSTEM-level child processes spawned from storage or management services, unusual kernel-pool corruption indicators, and anomalous use of storage-management APIs by low-privileged accounts - and patching should be prioritised on multi-user servers and VDI hosts where authenticated local access is broadly available. No vendor workaround supersedes installing the cumulative update, and the update should be applied through Windows Update, WSUS, or the Microsoft Update Catalog as appropriate for the environment.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Storage Spaces Controller, the kernel-mode storage-virtualization component that manages storage pools and virtual disks. Classic heap overflow conditions arise when a length, count or index derived from user-mode input is used to write into a kernel pool allocation without adequate bounds validation, causing out-of-bounds writes into adjacent pool memory; in kernel context this yields memory corruption that an attacker with the ability to reach the vulnerable code path can shape into controlled execution with kernel (SYSTEM) privileges. The CWE-122 classification combined with the CVSS vector's Scope:Unchanged and High confidentiality/integrity/availability impacts indicates that the overflow does not cross a security boundary beyond the local machine but can fully compromise the host's confidentiality, integrity and availability once triggered. No CPE strings were supplied in the source data; affected identification instead comes from EUVD version ranges, covering Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 in both full and Server Core SKUs. Because Storage Spaces Controller ships by default in these editions, the vulnerable code path is broadly present even on hosts that do not actively use storage pools, and the practical attack prerequisite is local authenticated access rather than any remote or network-facing exposure.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local EoP by an authorized user (AV:L, PR:L), no interaction, with heap overflow yielding SYSTEM-level total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H), scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage Spaces Controller allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation in the Windows Storage Spaces Controller affects default installations across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core. An authenticated low-privileged local user can exploit this flaw to gain SYSTEM-level control, turning a limited session into full administrative compromise on the host. The assessment notes no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available, so leadership should prioritize targeted patching and least-privilege controls rather than emergency response.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows component spanning Windows 10/11 and Server 2012-2025
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy