Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable kernel code path
  3. Exploit
    Read exposed kernel/system information
  4. Execution
    Harvest memory addresses defeating KASLR
  5. Impact
    Chain into local privilege escalation

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection System info exposure prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold valid low-privileged authenticated access and the ability to execute code locally on the affected Windows host (per AV:L/PR:L); it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated user, and no user interaction by a victim is needed (UI:N). The affected set covers default installations of all supported Windows 10/11 client builds and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 (including Server Core) below the patched build numbers listed in the EUVD advisory, so no non-default configuration is needed - only local foothold and an unpatched build. The principal limiting factor is the local-plus-authentication prerequisite, which confines risk to multi-user systems, shared/terminal servers, or hosts where an attacker has already gained initial access.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a genuine but moderate-priority local information-disclosure flaw rather than an urgent emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5 MEDIUM) describes a locally-exploitable issue requiring low-privilege authenticated access, with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. CISA's SSVC framework corroborates lower urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed activity), Automatable=no (cannot be mass-scripted at scale, consistent with the local vector and auth requirement), and Technical Impact=partial. This is NOT in the CISA KEV catalog and no public exploit has been identified, so there is no evidence of in-the-wild use. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so the quantitative exploitation-probability signal is missing; however, nothing in the other signals conflicts - all of them (local vector, required privileges, non-automatable, no exploitation observed) agree this is a lower-tier issue. The one genuinely serious element is C:H combined with the Windows Kernel component: the leaked data could be kernel memory/system information useful for defeating ASLR/KASLR and chaining into a local privilege-escalation exploit. Treat as a patch-in-normal-cycle item that rises in priority on multi-user or shared hosts, not a drop-everything issue.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (for example, a standard local user or a foothold from an earlier compromise) runs a crafted program that invokes the vulnerable kernel code path and reads back sensitive system information it should not be able to see. The disclosed kernel data (such as memory addresses) is then used to defeat kernel address randomization and improve the reliability of a separate local privilege-escalation exploit. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and because the vector is local with low complexity, exploitation is straightforward for anyone with code-execution access on the box.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local information disclosure in the Windows Kernel allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on the host to read sensitive system information that should be outside their control sphere. The flaw affects unpatched Windows 10 and Windows 11 client builds and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 (including Server Core installations) below the vendor-specified fixed build numbers, and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), meaning high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. Exploitation requires an existing local foothold and low-privileged credentials, cannot be triggered remotely or without authentication, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; a vendor-released patch is available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft cumulative security update that moves each affected platform to its fixed build - 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022) and 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025) - following the guidance at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70232. Prioritize shared and multi-user systems, Remote Desktop Session Hosts, jump boxes and terminal servers, since the AV:L/PR:L prerequisite means the realistic attack path is a low-privileged user on a host where someone else already has a session; on those systems, hardening interactive logon rights (removing unneeded accounts from Remote Desktop Users and local Administrators, and enforcing just-in-time or restricted admin access) reduces the pool of attackers who can reach the vulnerable code path, at the cost of some operational convenience for legitimate users. Because exploitation is local and requires an existing foothold, detection should focus on post-exploitation behavior rather than network signatures: monitor for unexpected kernel information-gathering via low-integrity processes, unusual access to system information APIs from non-privileged accounts, and anomalous privilege-transition activity. Application whitelisting or WDAC/AppLocker policies that block untrusted binaries from running in user context will not remove the flaw but do raise the cost of obtaining the local foothold the vulnerability depends on; note these controls require careful policy testing to avoid breaking legitimate line-of-business software. There is no network-side workaround or configuration toggle that eliminates this exposure - patching is the only complete fix, and delaying it leaves locally authenticated users able to read data above their intended privilege level.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-497, Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere, which in a kernel context means a kernel-mode component returns or exposes internal system data to a caller whose privilege level should not grant access to it - for example, leaking kernel memory contents, handle or object metadata, or privileged configuration data to a low-integrity process. The distinguishing characteristic here is the unauthorized control sphere rather than a memory-safety violation: the code path is reachable and functional, but the access check or redaction that should gate the information is inadequate or missing. The CVSS vector confirms this profile precisely: AV:L and PR:L mean the attacker must already be executing locally with low privileges, UI:N means no victim interaction is required, S:U indicates the impact stays within the same security authority, and the C:H with I:N/A:N combination shows a pure confidentiality leak with no ability to modify data or cause denial of service. CISA's SSVC assessment (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: partial) corroborates that this is not a wormable or opportunistically automatable condition and is gated behind an existing local presence on the target. The affected surface spans the shared Windows kernel binaries shipped across client and server SKUs, which is why the fix is delivered as a cumulative OS build update rather than a standalone component patch; ENISA tracks the issue as EUVD-2026-99877.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local authenticated attacker (AV:L, PR:L) reads sensitive kernel data with no complexity or interaction; only confidentiality is affected (C:H, I:N, A:N) within an unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 59% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Kernel ships in every supported Windows client and server edition
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy