Skip to main content

Desktop Window Manager CVE-2026-69974

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99127 MEDIUM
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-2jvx-vp83-rww7
4.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Craft process interacting with DWM
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in dwm
  4. Execution
    Leak adjacent memory contents
  5. Impact
    Harvest sensitive data for follow-on attack

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an attacker to already have local, authenticated access to the Windows host with at least low-level user privileges (PR:L) and the ability to run code that interacts with the Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe). The HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) indicates a meaningful limiting factor - the out-of-bounds read likely depends on winning a race condition or on specific memory/runtime state that the attacker cannot deterministically control, so exploitation is not reliable on every attempt. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no non-default configuration is required, but the mandatory local foothold plus high complexity substantially limit realistic risk. Impact is confined to information disclosure (C:H, I:N, A:N) with no integrity or availability effect. Affected builds span Windows 10 (1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2), and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 below the fixed build numbers listed in EUVD.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority vulnerability despite its HIGH confidentiality impact rating. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 4.7 MEDIUM) requires local access, high attack complexity, and existing low-level privileges (PR:L), which already constrains exploitation to an authenticated local user. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces this low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably scripted at scale, consistent with AC:H), and Technical Impact=partial (an out-of-bounds read discloses memory contents but does not grant full control). No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is NOT in the CISA KEV catalog and no POC was reported. All signals are consistent and point the same direction - a local, high-complexity information-disclosure bug useful mainly as a secondary primitive (e.g., defeating ASLR or leaking sensitive memory) rather than a standalone priority. The only mild tension is the C:H (HIGH confidentiality) rating against Technical Impact=partial, which reflects that while leaked data can be sensitive, the attacker needs local foothold and favorable timing to obtain it.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged local user already present on a Windows machine runs a crafted process that interacts with the Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) component to trigger an out-of-bounds read, leaking adjacent process memory. Because attack complexity is HIGH, the attacker likely must win a race or satisfy specific runtime conditions to reliably read useful data, and may use the leaked memory (e.g., addresses or secrets) to strengthen a separate privilege-escalation chain. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Information disclosure in the Windows Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) allows a locally authenticated attacker holding only low-level user privileges to read memory beyond an intended buffer inside the compositor process, potentially exposing data belonging to the DWM session. Exploitation is not straightforward: it requires an existing local foothold and the high attack complexity indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) means success likely depends on winning a race or hitting a specific memory state that the attacker cannot reliably control. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' (Automatable: no), and the issue is confined to confidentiality impact (C:H/I:N/A:N); Microsoft has released fixes for all affected Windows branches, making this a low-priority local information-disclosure flaw that is best addressed through routine patch cycles.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for each affected branch - the vendor-released patch fixes, per Microsoft's update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69974), are build 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019 (including Server Core), 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.19044.7807-class servicing for the 22H2 branch as listed by EUVD, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025 and Server Core, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, and 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already be running code locally with at least low privileges and to interact with dwm.exe under high-complexity conditions, priority should go to eliminating that foothold: enforce application allowlisting (WDAC/AppLocker) and least-privilege accounts so untrusted binaries cannot execute in an interactive session, restrict interactive logon and RDP access to trusted users only (trade-off: reduced administrative flexibility and possible help-desk friction), and harden browsers and document handlers that commonly deliver the initial local code execution. Disabling or replacing the Desktop Window Manager is not a viable workaround - dwm.exe is integral to the Windows desktop and session composition, and disabling it would break the graphical session or force Basic/legacy rendering modes with significant usability and compatibility costs; monitoring for anomalous dwm.exe memory-access behavior is likewise limited in value, so timely patching of all affected builds remains the primary and most reliable control.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) is the Windows compositing window manager introduced with Vista and still central to Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2016+. It renders all top-level windows into off-screen surfaces and composites them, communicating with client processes through the DWM API, window messages and shared surface buffers. The root cause is CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read), meaning a length, index or surface descriptor derived from data the attacker can influence is used without adequate bounds validation, so the process reads past the end of an allocated buffer. Per the authoritative assessment, the AC:H rating reflects a meaningful limiting factor - most plausibly a race condition or dependence on attacker-uncontrollable memory/runtime layout - so the read is not deterministic on every attempt. Because DWM runs in the user's session and handles surface data for multiple windows, the HIGH confidentiality rating is plausible, but there is no integrity or availability impact (I:N/A:N), no user interaction (UI:N) and no non-default configuration prerequisite; the only hard prerequisite is a local, authenticated foothold with at least low privileges (PR:L). Affected builds span Windows 10 1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, and Windows Server 2019, 2022 and 2025 (including Server Core installations), with EUVD tracking this as EUVD-2026-99127 and CISA SSVC assigning Technical Impact: partial.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 4.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.7 MEDIUM

Local DWM interaction by an authenticated low-privileged user gives AV:L/PR:L; the race/timing dependency of the OOB read gives AC:H; only memory disclosure, so C:H and I:N/A:N.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.7

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core Windows graphics component present on all modern Windows client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

24
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +24
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy