Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain low-privileged local foothold
-
DeliveryCraft process interacting with DWM
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds read in dwm
-
ExecutionLeak adjacent memory contents
-
ImpactHarvest sensitive data for follow-on attack
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to already have local, authenticated access to the Windows host with at least low-level user privileges (PR:L) and the ability to run code that interacts with the Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe). The HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) indicates a meaningful limiting factor - the out-of-bounds read likely depends on winning a race condition or on specific memory/runtime state that the attacker cannot deterministically control, so exploitation is not reliable on every attempt. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no non-default configuration is required, but the mandatory local foothold plus high complexity substantially limit realistic risk. Impact is confined to information disclosure (C:H, I:N, A:N) with no integrity or availability effect. Affected builds span Windows 10 (1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2), and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 below the fixed build numbers listed in EUVD. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority vulnerability despite its HIGH confidentiality impact rating. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 4.7 MEDIUM) requires local access, high attack complexity, and existing low-level privileges (PR:L), which already constrains exploitation to an authenticated local user. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces this low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably scripted at scale, consistent with AC:H), and Technical Impact=partial (an out-of-bounds read discloses memory contents but does not grant full control). No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is NOT in the CISA KEV catalog and no POC was reported. All signals are consistent and point the same direction - a local, high-complexity information-disclosure bug useful mainly as a secondary primitive (e.g., defeating ASLR or leaking sensitive memory) rather than a standalone priority. The only mild tension is the C:H (HIGH confidentiality) rating against Technical Impact=partial, which reflects that while leaked data can be sensitive, the attacker needs local foothold and favorable timing to obtain it. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged local user already present on a Windows machine runs a crafted process that interacts with the Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) component to trigger an out-of-bounds read, leaking adjacent process memory. Because attack complexity is HIGH, the attacker likely must win a race or satisfy specific runtime conditions to reliably read useful data, and may use the leaked memory (e.g., addresses or secrets) to strengthen a separate privilege-escalation chain. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Information disclosure in the Windows Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) allows a locally authenticated attacker holding only low-level user privileges to read memory beyond an intended buffer inside the compositor process, potentially exposing data belonging to the DWM session. Exploitation is not straightforward: it requires an existing local foothold and the high attack complexity indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) means success likely depends on winning a race or hitting a specific memory state that the attacker cannot reliably control. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' (Automatable: no), and the issue is confined to confidentiality impact (C:H/I:N/A:N); Microsoft has released fixes for all affected Windows branches, making this a low-priority local information-disclosure flaw that is best addressed through routine patch cycles.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for each affected branch - the vendor-released patch fixes, per Microsoft's update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69974), are build 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019 (including Server Core), 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.19044.7807-class servicing for the 22H2 branch as listed by EUVD, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025 and Server Core, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, and 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already be running code locally with at least low privileges and to interact with dwm.exe under high-complexity conditions, priority should go to eliminating that foothold: enforce application allowlisting (WDAC/AppLocker) and least-privilege accounts so untrusted binaries cannot execute in an interactive session, restrict interactive logon and RDP access to trusted users only (trade-off: reduced administrative flexibility and possible help-desk friction), and harden browsers and document handlers that commonly deliver the initial local code execution. Disabling or replacing the Desktop Window Manager is not a viable workaround - dwm.exe is integral to the Windows desktop and session composition, and disabling it would break the graphical session or force Basic/legacy rendering modes with significant usability and compatibility costs; monitoring for anomalous dwm.exe memory-access behavior is likewise limited in value, so timely patching of all affected builds remains the primary and most reliable control.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) is the Windows compositing window manager introduced with Vista and still central to Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2016+. It renders all top-level windows into off-screen surfaces and composites them, communicating with client processes through the DWM API, window messages and shared surface buffers. The root cause is CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read), meaning a length, index or surface descriptor derived from data the attacker can influence is used without adequate bounds validation, so the process reads past the end of an allocated buffer. Per the authoritative assessment, the AC:H rating reflects a meaningful limiting factor - most plausibly a race condition or dependence on attacker-uncontrollable memory/runtime layout - so the read is not deterministic on every attempt. Because DWM runs in the user's session and handles surface data for multiple windows, the HIGH confidentiality rating is plausible, but there is no integrity or availability impact (I:N/A:N), no user interaction (UI:N) and no non-default configuration prerequisite; the only hard prerequisite is a local, authenticated foothold with at least low privileges (PR:L). Affected builds span Windows 10 1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, and Windows Server 2019, 2022 and 2025 (including Server Core installations), with EUVD tracking this as EUVD-2026-99127 and CISA SSVC assigning Technical Impact: partial.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local DWM interaction by an authenticated low-privileged user gives AV:L/PR:L; the race/timing dependency of the OOB read gives AC:H; only memory disclosure, so C:H and I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds read in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99127
GHSA-2jvx-vp83-rww7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB