Skip to main content

SonicWall Email Security CVE-2026-66150

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56947 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-08-11 sonicwall GHSA-q28x-3mgc-vv69
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: sonicwall
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain restricted CLI credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to Email Security appliance CLI via SSH
  3. Exploit
    Issue crafted SNMP CLI command with injected OS payload
  4. Execution
    Appliance passes unsanitized input to OS command handler
  5. Persist
    Injected commands execute as root
  6. Impact
    Full appliance OS compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concrete prerequisites: (1) the attacker must hold valid credentials granting access to the SonicWall Email Security restricted CLI - confirmed by the CVSS PR:L designation, meaning standard (non-administrative) CLI credentials suffice; (2) the SNMP functionality must be accessible or invokable from within the restricted CLI session, which is the default configuration for this appliance class. The CVSS AV:L confirms that the attack vector is local - the CLI must be reachable, typically via SSH to the management interface. Exploitation is not automatable per SSVC, as it requires an interactive CLI session. The primary limiting factors are: the need for valid CLI credentials (no unauthenticated path exists per the CVSS vector), local/CLI reachability of the management interface (not a direct internet-facing remote attack), and the requirement for manual interaction. No special OS configuration or feature toggle beyond default appliance setup is indicated as required.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects a local, low-complexity attack requiring only restricted CLI credentials - not administrative rights - with no user interaction. This is consistent with the SSVC classification: Exploitation: none (no active exploitation confirmed), Automatable: no (requires a manual interactive CLI session), Technical Impact: total (full root-level compromise). The combination of low attack complexity and total impact means that any organization granting CLI access to non-administrative or shared service accounts faces material risk. EPSS data was not provided in the intelligence feed, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. There is no CISA KEV listing and no known public POC at time of analysis, which moderates urgency relative to the CVSS score alone. However, the straightforward nature of command injection - once CLI access exists - means the practical barrier to exploitation is low for any attacker who already holds restricted CLI credentials. The absence of network-level exploitability (AV:L) is the primary limiting factor for mass exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained valid restricted CLI credentials - via phishing, credential reuse, or insider access - authenticates to the SonicWall Email Security appliance over SSH. They issue a crafted SNMP-related CLI command with injected shell metacharacters (e.g., backticks or semicolons) in an argument field. The appliance passes the unsanitized input directly to an OS command, executing the injected payload as root and granting the attacker full control of the appliance operating system. No public POC is known at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

OS command injection via the SNMP-handling code path in SonicWall Email Security 10.0.35.8405 and earlier grants a low-privileged, authenticated CLI user root-level code execution on the underlying appliance OS. The restricted CLI fails to sanitize user-supplied input before passing it to SNMP-related system commands, enabling full host compromise. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the total technical impact (full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss) makes this a high priority for any deployment where CLI access is shared or weakly controlled.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-released patch per SonicWall advisory SNWLID-2026-0012 at https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2026-0012, upgrading beyond the affected boundary of version 10.0.35.8405. Until patching is complete, restrict CLI access to the smallest possible set of explicitly trusted, individually identified administrators - eliminating shared or service-account CLI credentials removes the most realistic attack path. Placing the management interface (SSH/console) on a dedicated, isolated management VLAN or OOB network prevents lateral-movement scenarios where a compromised internal host could be used to reach the CLI. Disabling SNMP-related CLI commands entirely, if operationally feasible, would remove the vulnerable code path without requiring an immediate upgrade, though this may impact monitoring capabilities and should be evaluated against operational requirements.

Affected VersionsENISA

Email Security 10.0.35.8405 and earlier versions

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SonicWall Email Security (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:sonicwall:email_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a dedicated email security appliance that exposes a restricted management CLI, likely over SSH. The vulnerable code path involves SNMP-related CLI commands: user-supplied arguments are passed to OS-level SNMP utilities or configuration handlers without adequate input sanitization. CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code) describes the root cause - the application constructs executable code or OS command strings from untrusted input, allowing an attacker to break out of the intended restricted command set and inject arbitrary shell instructions. Because the SNMP subsystem on appliances commonly runs with elevated privileges, injected commands execute as root rather than within a sandboxed user context.

Know when Email Security gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (sonicwall) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local vector because exploitation requires CLI session access; PR:L because restricted (non-admin) CLI credentials suffice; full C/I/A because root-level code execution is achieved.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (sonicwall).

CVSS VectorVendor: sonicwall

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') Vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security appliance allows an authenticated attacker with access to the SonicWall Email Security restricted CLI can inject arbitrary OS commands that execute as root via SNMP.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

SonicWall Email Security versions 10.0.35.8405 and earlier are vulnerable to OS command injection that allows low-privileged CLI users to escalate to root access and completely compromise the appliance. This vulnerability exposes organizations using affected versions to email system compromise, data theft, and service disruption, particularly where CLI access is shared across team members or credentials lack robust controls. The absence of a security patch makes urgent mitigation through version migration or strict access controls critical to organizational security.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: restrict CLI access to essential administrators only, implement comprehensive audit logging and real-time alerting for all CLI sessions and command execution, enforce multi-factor authentication for CLI access, segment network access to limit who can reach the CLI interface, and monitor system logs for command injection attempts or anomalous SNMP operations. These controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the vulnerability-prioritize planning for immediate upgrade to an unaffected version.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise email security appliance, significant but non-universal deployment
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2021-44228 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 10

Apache Log4j2 contains a critical JNDI injection vulnerability known as 'Log4Shell' that allows unauthenticated remote c

CVE-2021-20021 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 09

A vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x allows an attacker to create an administrative account

CVE-2021-20023 MEDIUM
4.9 Apr 20

SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to read an

CVE-2021-45105 MEDIUM
5.9 Dec 18

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursio

CVE-2021-20022 HIGH
7.2 Apr 09

SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to upload a

CVE-2018-3639 MEDIUM POC
5.5 May 22

Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addres

CVE-2021-3450 HIGH
7.4 Mar 25

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain.

CVE-2023-2080 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 15

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Forcepoint Cloud S

CVE-2022-1700 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 12

Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference ('XXE') vulnerability in the Policy Engine of Forcepoint Data Loss

CVE-2019-6140 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 09

A configuration issue has been discovered in Forcepoint Email Security 8.4.x and 8.5.x: the product is left in a vulnera

CVE-2026-66149 HIGH
7.8 Aug 11

OS command injection in SonicWall Email Security (versions 10.0.35.8405 and earlier) allows an authenticated restricted

CVE-2024-2166 MEDIUM
6.1 Sep 04

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Forcepoint Email S

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy