Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local account
-
DeliveryPlant malicious symlink/junction in backup path
-
ExploitTrigger Windows Backup Engine operation
-
ExecutionEngine follows link to protected file
-
ImpactDisclose sensitive file contents
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Symlink resolution safety
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have valid low-privileged local access (PR:L) to the Windows host and the ability to create or control filesystem links (symbolic links or NTFS junctions) within a path processed by the Windows Backup Engine; the attacker then relies on a backup or restore operation resolving that link to a protected target. LIMITING FACTORS: it is not remotely exploitable (AV:L), cannot be triggered without authentication, requires the Windows Backup Engine component to be invoked, and affects only unpatched builds below the fixed versions listed in EUVD (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 10 22H2 below 10.0.19044.7807). Impact is confined to information disclosure - no integrity or availability effect. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, low-priority local information-disclosure flaw rather than a widespread emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, score 5.5) consistently indicates a LOCAL attack requiring pre-existing low-level authenticated access (PR:L) with no user interaction, yielding high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be mass-scripted at scale), Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. All signals agree and are mutually consistent - the local vector, required privileges, and SSVC 'none/no/partial' ratings all point to a low-real-risk issue despite the HIGH confidentiality sub-score. The main caveat is that 'authorized attacker' in the description aligns with PR:L but the exact privilege level and which files/data can be disclosed are not detailed by the input; verify specific impact scope with Microsoft's MSRC advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local, already-authenticated user on a Windows host abuses the Windows Backup Engine's improper handling of symbolic links or junctions so that a backup/restore operation follows an attacker-controlled link and reads a file the user should not be able to access, disclosing its contents. No public proof-of-concept exploit is identified, and the low attack complexity means a knowledgeable local user could trigger it reliably, but it cannot be performed remotely or without valid credentials. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local information disclosure in the Windows Backup Engine allows an attacker who already holds valid low-privileged local access to a Windows host to create a symbolic link or NTFS junction in a filesystem path processed by the backup engine, so that a subsequent backup or restore operation resolves the link and discloses the contents of a protected target file the attacker could not normally read. The flaw is rated 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), reflecting that it is not remotely reachable, requires authentication and local logon, needs the Windows Backup Engine component to actually be invoked, and yields confidentiality impact only - with no integrity or availability effect - on unpatched Windows 10 21H2/22H2 and Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1 and 26H2 builds below the fixed version levels recorded in EUVD. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis: CISA SSVC records exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', and no KEV listing or POC reference appears in the supplied intelligence. A vendor-released patch is available, making this a moderate, low-priority local information-disclosure flaw rather than a widespread emergency.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch: the fix versions recorded for this CVE are Windows 11 24H2 build 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 build 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H2 build 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 11 26H1 build 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 23H2 build 10.0.22631.7652, and Windows 10 21H2/22H2 build 10.0.19044.7807, all delivered through the Microsoft Security Response Center update guide for CVE-2026-62687 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62687) and tracked as EUVD-2026-99839. Where immediate patching is not possible, the highest-value compensating controls follow directly from the CWE-59 root cause: restrict who can create symbolic links by ensuring the SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege is not granted to unprivileged accounts and by disabling Windows Developer Mode, which otherwise lets non-administrators create symbolic links (trade-off: Developer Mode is required by some developer tooling and disabling it breaks those workflows; directory junctions can still be created without that privilege, so this is only partial); tighten NTFS write permissions and auditing on backup staging, catalog and target directories so untrusted users cannot plant links in paths the Backup Engine will traverse (trade-off: may conflict with existing backup job configurations); avoid running backup or restore jobs that traverse user-writable directories with an elevated service identity; and limit local interactive logon and code execution on backup servers to reduce the PR:L surface this attack depends on. Because exploitation requires local authenticated access and the Backup Engine to be invoked, monitoring for unexpected reparse points in backup paths and for backup-engine file-read failures or anomalies provides useful detection in the interim. No public exploit code is known, exploitation is assessed as 'none' in SSVC, and the vulnerability is not remotely exploitable, so emergency out-of-band patching is not warranted - standard monthly servicing is sufficient.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 7 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-59, improper link resolution before file access ('link following'), in the Windows Backup Engine. Windows filesystem reparse points - NTFS symbolic links and directory junctions - are resolved transparently by the I/O manager when a process opens a path, so any program that walks a path and opens files without validating the resolved target can be redirected to an arbitrary location. The Backup Engine is the privileged component that enumerates and reads user- and system-supplied paths and can run in a context with broader read access than the interactive user, so if a low-privileged user can pre-place or race a link inside a directory the engine processes, an elevated read of a protected file can be redirected back to the attacker (for example through the resulting backup artifact or error/verbatim path handling). No CPE strings were supplied with this record; product scoping therefore comes from the EUVD affected-version ranges, which cover Windows 10 21H2, Windows 10 22H2, Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1 and 26H2 builds below the listed fixed builds. The assessed vector AV:L/PR:L/UI:N confirms the attacker must already have local low-privileged code execution or an interactive session and that no user interaction or network vector is involved; impact is bounded to confidentiality (C:H/I:N/A:N), consistent with the SSVC technical-impact rating of 'partial' and exploitation status of 'none'.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local link-following abuse by an already-authenticated low-privileged user gives AV:L and PR:L; disclosure-only impact sets C:H with I:N/A:N and no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Backup Engine allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99839
GHSA-99cv-qr86-89xq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB