Skip to main content

Reyrolle 7SR5 CVE-2026-62654

| EUVDEUVD-2026-72668 HIGH
Download of Code Without Integrity Check (CWE-494)
2026-09-08 siemens GHSA-gq4w-8jx8-2hcg
7.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: siemens
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Gain physical access to relay panel
  2. Delivery
    Power-cycle relay while entering boot key sequence
  3. Exploit
    Relay enters unsigned maintenance mode
  4. Install
    Relay contacts attacker-controlled network server
  5. C2
    Server delivers unsigned malicious code
  6. Execute
    Relay executes arbitrary code without verification
  7. Impact
    Full device compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Code integrity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concrete prerequisites: (1) physical access to the Reyrolle 7SR5 hardware sufficient to enter a specific key sequence during device power-on/boot - this is the primary controlling constraint confirmed by CVSS 4.0 AV:P; and (2) a network server reachable by the relay at boot time to serve the malicious code, which an on-site attacker can trivially supply via a laptop connected to the maintenance port or LAN. No authentication credentials are required once physically present. Exploitation is limited by: physical-access controls on substation relay panels, the need to cause a device reboot (which may be detectable in SCADA/DCS event logs), and the requirement to have a server reachable on the relay's network. Remote-only network exploitation is not possible - AV:P is confirmed by both the CVSS 4.0 vector and the description's explicit 'physical key sequence during device boot' prerequisite.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.0 with AV:P accurately reflects that physical presence at the relay is the controlling constraint - all confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are rated High once that barrier is cleared, making compromise total. In practice, OT substation environments do not always enforce tight physical access controls: maintenance windows, third-party contractors, and supply-chain service visits all represent plausible physical-access vectors. The impact extends beyond the relay itself in critical-infrastructure terms because protection relays that operate incorrectly can cause uncontrolled fault clearance or deliberate tripping of feeders. Even a mid-sized municipal utility operator in gniezno should treat this as a priority patch given that Siemens has confirmed the vulnerability and released a fix. No EPSS score was provided and the vulnerability is not in the CISA KEV catalog, suggesting no observed opportunistic exploitation; however, targeted threat actors focused on OT infrastructure (ICS-capable APTs) represent the realistic adversary profile here. The server-side code delivery step adds one additional requirement - a reachable network server - but an attacker controlling the physical environment can trivially satisfy this with a laptop on the maintenance LAN.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with physical access to an unpatched Reyrolle 7SR5 - for example, a malicious contractor during a scheduled maintenance visit - powers off the relay and re-applies power while entering the documented key sequence to trigger maintenance mode. The attacker has pre-positioned a laptop running a trivial HTTP/TFTP server on the relay's maintenance VLAN. The relay downloads a maliciously crafted firmware image or executable from that server, executes it without any integrity check, and the attacker achieves persistent, arbitrary code execution on the protection relay, enabling deliberate misoperation or denial-of-protection-functions.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Sep 08, 2026

Unsigned code execution on Siemens Reyrolle 7SR5 protection relays (all firmware versions before V2.70) is possible when an attacker with physical access triggers a special maintenance boot mode via a hardware key sequence. In this mode the relay unconditionally downloads and executes code from a network server with no cryptographic signature or integrity verification, fully satisfying CWE-494. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog; risk is bounded by the physical-access prerequisite but is severe once that barrier is crossed in OT substation environments.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Sep 08, 2026 - 09:08 CVSS 6.8

Physical-access code execution against Siemens Reyrolle 7SR5 protection relays (all versions below V2.70) allows an attacker who can interact with the device during boot to trigger a maintenance mode via a physical key sequence, causing the relay to fetch and execute unsigned program code from an attacker-controlled network server without any authenticity or integrity verification. The full C:H/I:H/A:H impact reflects complete device compromise, including the ability to manipulate protection functions or disable the relay. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; Siemens has released a fix in V2.70 per advisory SSA-142885.

RemediationAI

Upgrade affected Reyrolle 7SR5 relays to firmware V2.70 or later, which is the vendor-released fix per Siemens advisory SSA-142885 (https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-142885.html). Where immediate patching is not possible during maintenance windows, apply the following compensating controls: restrict physical access to relay panels using locked cabinets and access-controlled substations, logging all entry with audit trails (this directly removes the AV:P prerequisite for untrusted parties); configure network segmentation so the relay's maintenance-mode network server address resolves only to an authorized internal host, preventing an attacker's substitute server from responding even if maintenance mode is triggered; and monitor for anomalous boot-time network connections from relay IP addresses to detect unauthorized maintenance-mode activation. Note that network segmentation alone is insufficient without physical access control, since an attacker can bring their own server.

Affected VersionsENISA

Reyrolle 7SR5 0 <V2.70

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Siemens Reyrolle 7SR5 is a feeder protection relay deployed in electrical substations and distribution networks for overcurrent, earth-fault, and differential protection functions in OT/ICS environments. The affected component is a special maintenance boot mode, activated via a physical key sequence at power-on, that fetches executable code from a configurable network server. CWE-494 (Download of Code Without Integrity Check) is the root cause: the device performs no cryptographic signature verification, hash comparison, or authenticity check on the retrieved binary before loading and executing it. The CVSS 4.0 vector confirms physical access (AV:P) as the attack vector, ruling out remote-only network exploitation. CPE cpe:2.3:a:siemens:reyrolle_7sr5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all versions before the V2.70 fix.

Know when Reyrolle 7Sr5 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (siemens) PRIMARY 7.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.8 MEDIUM

Physical key sequence at boot requires on-site presence (AV:P); no credentials or privileges needed once present; full device compromise with no scope change.

3.1 AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (siemens).

CVSS VectorVendor: siemens

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Sep 08, 2026 - 09:35 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
Severity Changed
Sep 08, 2026 - 09:22 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Sep 08, 2026 - 09:22 NVD
6.8 (MEDIUM) 7.0 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in Reyrolle 7SR5 (All versions < V2.70). A special maintenance mode can be activated via a physical key sequence during device boot, in which the device downloads and executes program code from a network server without verifying its authenticity or integrity. This could allow an attacker with physical access to the device to upload and execute arbitrary, unsigned code.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Siemens Reyrolle 7SR5 protection relays in deployed substations allow arbitrary code execution through a maintenance boot mode accessible with physical hardware key controls. While no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, successful exploitation would enable attackers to disable or manipulate protective functions, creating direct threat to grid stability and infrastructure reliability for affected utilities.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Enforce multi-factor physical access with two-person authorization for cabinet entry; disable or isolate network connectivity to relay management interfaces where operationally feasible; monitor and alert on maintenance mode activation attempts; maintain cryptographic firmware baselines for early detection of unauthorized modifications; implement strict change control for all firmware updates; consider temporary relocation of critical protection functions to redundant relays while maintaining defensive posture.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized protection relay for electrical substations only
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CISA VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA Vulnrichment, CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy