Skip to main content

Simcenter Nastran CVE-2026-59086

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56120 HIGH
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-08-11 siemens GHSA-v69q-r268-rv35
7.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: siemens
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local access or influence job script input
  2. Delivery
    Craft oversized string argument for vulnerable Nastran binary
  3. Exploit
    User or pipeline invokes binary with crafted argument
  4. Execution
    Stack buffer overflow overwrites return address
  5. Persist
    Redirect execution to attacker-controlled code
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as invoking user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the ability to control or influence string arguments passed to one or more Simcenter Nastran application binaries at the time of execution - achievable through direct local shell access, through a shared automated workflow that processes external job or configuration files, or by convincing a local user to invoke a binary with attacker-supplied arguments. The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:L confirms the attacker must have local execution context on the host; network-only access does not satisfy the attack conditions. UI:P (passive user interaction) indicates a user or process must actually invoke the binary. AC:H limits reliable exploitation: successful code execution likely requires knowledge of the target system's memory layout to overcome stack canaries and ASLR. No elevated privileges are required to invoke the binary itself (PR:N), but physical or authenticated remote shell access to the host is a hard prerequisite. Default installations where Nastran is run only by trusted analysts on isolated engineering workstations present minimal exploitation surface.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.3 with a local attack vector (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), and required user interaction (UI:P) collectively constrain real-world exploitability well below what the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact ratings might initially suggest. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, and this vulnerability does not appear in the CISA KEV catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation campaign. The absence of known public proof-of-concept code further reduces immediate exploitation urgency. Even a mid-sized industrial engineering IT team in zabrze operating Simcenter Nastran within automated batch-processing pipelines should treat this as a meaningful priority if external parties can influence command-line arguments supplied to the application - but for isolated, analyst-operated workstations the practical attack surface remains narrow. The AC:H rating suggests reliable exploitation requires precise understanding of the target's memory layout to defeat modern mitigations such as ASLR and stack canaries, raising the bar beyond opportunistic exploitation. The primary threat model is a malicious or compromised CAE job script, configuration file, or workflow integration that passes attacker-controlled strings to the vulnerable binary.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A threat actor with local host access, or one able to inject a malicious job script into an automated simulation pipeline, crafts an oversized string argument targeting the fixed stack buffer in a Simcenter Nastran binary. When a user or scheduled task invokes the binary with the crafted input, the stack is overwritten and control flow is redirected, achieving code execution as the invoking user. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but CWE-121 exploitation techniques are well-documented and the barrier is primarily the AC:H complexity of defeating memory-layout randomization on the specific host.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Aug 11, 2026

Stack-based code execution in Simcenter Nastran allows an attacker who can supply maliciously crafted string arguments to an affected application binary to overflow a stack buffer and execute arbitrary code within the running process context. All versions of Siemens' finite-element analysis solver prior to V2606 are affected, as confirmed by Siemens ProductCERT advisory SSA-069220. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is absent from the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog at time of analysis.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Aug 11, 2026 - 13:12 CVSS 7.8

Stack-based buffer overflow in Siemens Simcenter Nastran (all versions prior to V2606) enables arbitrary code execution in the context of the affected process when a victim invokes a Nastran application binary with a specially crafted string argument. The local attack vector and required user interaction (CVSS AV:L/UI:R) place this squarely in file-based or argument-delivery attack scenarios common to CAE/FEA engineering workflows. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis; Siemens has released a patched version and published advisory SSA-069220.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade Simcenter Nastran to version V2606 or later per Siemens ProductCERT advisory SSA-069220 at https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-069220.html. Until patching is feasible, organizations should strictly control what arguments are passed to Simcenter Nastran binaries by ensuring that command-line inputs are never sourced from untrusted external data, user-submitted job files, or unvalidated scripts - wrapping affected binaries with an input-validation layer or argument allowlist would reduce the attack surface without disabling core solver functionality. Running Simcenter Nastran under a dedicated low-privilege service account and isolating its execution environment through OS-level sandboxing or containerization would limit the blast radius of any successful exploitation, since code execution is confined to the invoking process context. Restricting file system and network access for the process using mandatory access control frameworks (e.g., SELinux or AppArmor) adds a compensating layer pending patch deployment.

Affected VersionsENISA

Simcenter Nastran 0 <V2606

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Simcenter Nastran (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:siemens:simcenter_nastran:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is Siemens' commercial finite-element analysis solver widely used in structural, thermal, and fluid simulations across aerospace, automotive, and industrial engineering sectors. The root cause is CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow): one or more application binaries fail to validate the length of a user-supplied string before copying it into a fixed-size stack buffer during argument parsing. Because stack buffers are adjacent to saved return addresses and frame pointers, an oversized input can overwrite control-flow data and redirect execution to attacker-controlled code. The CVSS 4.0 local attack vector (AV:L) and passive user interaction (UI:P) indicate the vulnerable code path is reached only when a user or automated process invokes the affected binary with crafted command-line arguments, not via a network-reachable interface.

Know when Simcenter Nastran gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (siemens) PRIMARY 7.3 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local attack vector with required user invocation and high complexity to reliably control execution; no privilege escalation and no scope change beyond the process context.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (siemens).

CVSS VectorVendor: siemens

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Aug 11, 2026 - 13:37 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
Aug 11, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH) 7.3 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 12:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2606). The affected applications contain a stack overflow vulnerability while parsing specially strings as argument for one of the application binaries. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Simcenter Nastran, a critical engineering analysis tool used by design and manufacturing teams, is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when processing maliciously crafted input files-a high-severity flaw affecting all versions prior to V2606. Compromise could allow attackers to gain control of engineering workstations and potentially access sensitive CAD designs, simulation data, and intellectual property. Organizations must immediately upgrade to V2606 or restrict this software's usage pending deployment.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized Siemens FEA solver, niche aerospace and industrial engineering use
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CISA VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy