Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed RDP listener on 3389
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted RDP protocol message
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in RDP parser
  4. Execution
    Receive leaked adjacent memory in response
  5. Impact
    Harvest sensitive data for follow-on attack

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the RDP service (default TCP/UDP port 3389) on an unpatched Windows host; per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) no authentication and no user interaction are needed against a listening RDP endpoint. The practical limiting factor is exposure: RDP must be enabled and reachable by the attacker, so hosts where RDP is disabled, firewalled to trusted networks, or fronted by a VPN/RD Gateway are not directly exploitable. Impact is limited to information disclosure (C:H, I:N, A:N) - a single successful read leaks memory contents but does not by itself grant code execution or modify the system.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, score 7.5) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated read with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability effect - consistent with a memory-disclosure bug rather than code execution. Real-world signals temper this: EPSS is only 0.89% (55th percentile), CISA SSVC scores Exploitation as 'none', Automatable as 'no', and Technical Impact as 'partial'. These lower-tier signals align well with an info-leak that yields partial data rather than full compromise, so this is a moderate-priority patch rather than an emergency. The main aggravating factor is exposure surface: RDP is frequently internet-facing, and information leaked from RDP memory (session tokens, credentials, key material) could feed follow-on attacks, so internet-exposed RDP endpoints should be prioritized above internal ones. No conflicting data was identified; the CVSS network vector is consistent with the description's 'over a network' wording.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach an exposed RDP listener (port 3389) sends a crafted RDP protocol message that triggers the out-of-bounds read, causing the service to return adjacent memory contents in its response. Because no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), the attacker can repeatedly probe to harvest leaked memory that may contain credentials, session data, or pointers useful for chaining further attacks. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026

Information disclosure in Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to read out-of-bounds memory over the network, potentially leaking sensitive process data from affected systems. The flaw (CWE-125) affects a broad range of Windows client and server releases from Windows Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025, and is patched by Microsoft. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none with a low EPSS probability (0.89%).

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-58539 via Windows Update or WSUS; Vendor-released patch fixed builds by SKU are listed in the Microsoft advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539 (e.g. Windows 11 24H2/25H2 build 10.0.26100.8875, Server 2025 build 10.0.26100.33158, Server 2012 build 6.2.9200.26226). Where patching cannot be immediate, reduce exposure by restricting RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) to trusted networks, placing it behind a VPN or Remote Desktop Gateway, and enabling Network Level Authentication so that unauthenticated pre-auth parsing is not reachable by arbitrary internet hosts - note NLA does not fully eliminate pre-authentication protocol handling but narrows the attack surface, and blocking 3389 at the perimeter will break any legitimate direct RDP access that relies on it. Prioritize internet-facing RDP servers first.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2525
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2525
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 18 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) implementation within Windows, the service handling remote graphical sessions typically exposed on TCP/UDP 3389. The root cause is CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read): the RDP code parses attacker-influenced network input and reads beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer, returning adjacent heap or stack memory to the attacker. The vendor CPE and EUVD data enumerate the affected component across the Windows RDP stack in both client (Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 24H2/25H2/26H1) and server SKUs (Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, 2025, including Server Core installations). Note the supplied CPE strings use the 'a:' (application) prefix rather than 'o:' (operating system) for these Windows versions, which is atypical but does not change the affected surface.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Unauthenticated network-reachable RDP parsing with no user interaction gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; a memory-disclosure OOB read yields C:H with I:N/A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Severity Changed
Jul 16, 2026 - 20:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Jul 16, 2026 - 20:37 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM) 7.5 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Jul 14, 2026 - 17:10 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5
CVE Published
Jul 14, 2026 - 17:10 nvd
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionNVD

Out-of-bounds read in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) contains an information disclosure vulnerability affecting Windows Server 2012 through 2025 and Windows 11 systems, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to leak sensitive process data via out-of-bounds memory reads. The vulnerability's broad version coverage exposes the majority of enterprise Windows infrastructure to this attack surface. While current exploitation activity is minimal, a vendor patch is available and should be deployed promptly to eliminate the memory disclosure risk.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 45% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
RDP ships in all Windows client and server editions, widely deployed
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy