Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed AD FS endpoint over network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted oversized request
  3. Exploit
    Overflow fixed-size stack buffer
  4. Execution
    Crash AD FS service
  5. Impact
    Federated authentication outage for dependent apps

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to a running AD FS service endpoint; the attacker needs no authentication, no privileges, and no user interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N/AC:L), so any host able to reach the AD FS or Web Application Proxy listener can attempt it against default configurations. The principal limiting factor is exposure and role deployment: only servers with the AD FS role installed and reachable are at risk, so environments that keep AD FS strictly internal or behind restrictive Web Application Proxy filtering substantially narrow the attack surface. The impact is limited to denial of service (A:H, C:N/I:N) - a service crash - not data theft or code execution.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) describes an attractive, low-friction DoS: reachable over the network, low attack complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction - but the impact is strictly availability, with no confidentiality or integrity loss. There is no EPSS score, KEV entry, or POC in the supplied data, so real-world exploitation pressure is presently unquantified; the signals we do have suggest a genuine but non-critical priority. The key mitigating factor is exposure: AD FS is normally deployed behind a Web Application Proxy and typically internet-facing only for federated login, so the blast radius depends heavily on whether the AD FS endpoint is externally reachable. This is a legitimate patch-soon item for identity infrastructure rather than an emergency, given the absence of code execution and of any evidence of active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with no credentials sends a crafted request to an internet-reachable AD FS endpoint, overflowing a fixed-size stack buffer and crashing the service. With AD FS down, users and applications relying on it for single sign-on can no longer authenticate, producing an outage across all federated services. No public proof-of-concept is identified at time of analysis, and low attack complexity means a working exploit, if developed, would be simple to fire repeatedly.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

Denial of service in Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to crash the service by triggering a stack-based buffer overflow over the network (CVSS 7.5, availability-only impact). Because AD FS brokers single sign-on and federated authentication, a successful attack can knock out login for every downstream application that relies on it. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-50695 as delivered through the monthly cumulative update for each affected Windows Server version; Patch available per vendor advisory (an exact fixed build number is not specified in the provided data, so obtain the precise KB from the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695). As compensating controls until patching completes, restrict network reachability to the AD FS and Web Application Proxy endpoints - limit the federation service to trusted networks, place it behind the Web Application Proxy rather than exposing the AD FS servers directly, and use firewall rules or extranet smart lockout/geo-filtering to reduce the pool of hosts that can reach the vulnerable listener; the trade-off is that overly aggressive filtering can break legitimate external federated logins, so scope rules to known partner and client ranges. Ensure AD FS server redundancy (farm nodes behind a load balancer) so a single crashed node does not eliminate authentication availability.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26226 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26226, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26226
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23291 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23291, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23291
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 32 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121), a memory-safety defect in which network-supplied data is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without adequate bounds checking, corrupting the stack. It resides in AD FS, the Windows role that provides claims-based federated identity and single sign-on (SAML/WS-Federation/OAuth) across organizational boundaries. The affected CPE and tag data enumerate the full Windows Server line that can host the AD FS role - Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 (including Server Core installations) - while the additional Windows 10/11 client CPEs reflect Microsoft's shared servicing-stack update packaging rather than the client OS itself running AD FS. While CWE-121 buffer overflows can sometimes yield code execution, the CVSS vector here scores only availability impact (C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating the practical outcome is a service crash rather than compromise.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 6.5 MEDIUM
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Remotely reachable AD FS listener needs no auth or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); a stack overflow crashes the service, so availability-only impact (A:H, C:N/I:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Stack-based buffer overflow in Active Directory Federation Services allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) contains a remote denial-of-service vulnerability that enables attackers to disable authentication infrastructure. Since AD FS manages single sign-on for downstream applications, an attack would prevent users across the organization from logging into critical systems. This directly impacts business continuity and employee productivity, making immediate patching essential.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 47% exploitable
Prevalence
High
AD FS is widely deployed enterprise identity infrastructure on Windows Server
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy