Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local standard-user session (interactive or RDP)
  2. Delivery
    Trigger crafted DWM rendering operation
  3. Exploit
    Cause out-of-bounds read in DWM Core Library
  4. Execution
    Receive leaked adjacent memory contents
  5. Impact
    Extract sensitive in-memory data (tokens, credentials)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must hold a valid local user account with at least standard (low-privileged) access - this is confirmed by the CVSS PR:L metric. Interactive local access or a Remote Desktop session to the target system is required (AV:L). No special DWM configuration or non-default feature enablement is required; DWM runs by default on all Windows graphical installations. Exploitation is strictly bounded to the local attack surface - remote unauthenticated exploitation is not possible. Defenders should note that Server Core installations appear in the CPE and EUVD scope; however, Server Core typically lacks the full graphical shell and DWM may not run in the same compositing mode - verify actual DWM presence before deprioritizing Server Core patching. The SSVC 'Automatable: no' rating indicates reliable mass exploitation is constrained, likely due to memory layout variability or timing sensitivity in triggering the out-of-bounds condition.

Impact

All available signals converge on a low operational priority despite the Medium CVSS score. The CVSS 5.5 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) correctly reflects a local-only, low-complexity information disclosure with no integrity or availability impact - a meaningful but bounded threat profile. EPSS at 0.31% (22nd percentile) is well below thresholds typically associated with exploitation in the wild. CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as 'none', automatable as 'no', and technical impact as 'partial', all consistent with a flaw that requires a local foothold to exploit and yields only memory read capability rather than code execution. The vulnerability does not appear in the CISA KEV catalog and no public exploit code is identified in the provided data. The primary residual risk is post-compromise lateral reconnaissance: an attacker who already has a standard user session on a multi-user system could harvest in-memory artifacts from the DWM process. The C:H metric reflects high confidentiality impact within the vulnerable system's scope but does not imply remote or unauthenticated exposure - defenders should not treat this as a perimeter-level priority.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A standard user account on a shared Windows terminal server or multi-user workstation executes a crafted application or triggers a specific DWM rendering sequence that causes the Core Library to read beyond an allocated buffer boundary. The returned out-of-bounds data may expose heap contents from adjacent DWM allocations, which an attacker can scan for authentication tokens, credential material, or other sensitive in-memory artifacts from other user sessions composited by DWM. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, so this scenario requires custom tooling to operationalize.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026

Out-of-bounds memory read in the Windows Desktop Window Manager (DWM) Core Library enables a locally authenticated, low-privileged user to disclose sensitive memory contents across a wide range of Windows client and server versions. The flaw is reachable by any standard user account without administrative rights, making it relevant in multi-user, shared workstation, and terminal services environments. No active exploitation is confirmed - CISA SSVC rates exploitation as 'none', EPSS sits at 0.31% (22nd percentile), and no KEV listing exists - but the broad affected surface spanning Windows 10 through Windows 11 and Server 2025 warrants timely patching.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch through Windows Update or the Microsoft Update Catalog. Per EUVD-confirmed fixed build versions, target builds are: 10.0.14393.9339 for Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016; 10.0.17763.9020 for Windows 10 1809, Server 2019, and Server 2019 Server Core; 10.0.19044.7548 for Windows 10 21H2; 10.0.19045.7548 for Windows 10 22H2; 10.0.20348.5386 for Server 2022; 10.0.26100.8875 for Windows 11 24H2 and 10.0.26100.33158 for Server 2025 and Server 2025 Server Core; 10.0.26200.8875 for Windows 11 25H2; and 10.0.28000.2269 for Windows 11 26H1. Full patch details are available at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict local logon rights (via Group Policy - 'Allow log on locally') to limit which accounts can reach the vulnerable DWM code path; note this is disruptive in shared desktop or terminal services environments. DWM cannot be selectively disabled on graphical Windows installations without removing the entire graphical shell, which is impractical on client systems.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 26 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) is the compositing window manager built into Windows since Vista, responsible for hardware-accelerated rendering of the graphical shell including transparency, window thumbnails, and Aero effects. It runs as a protected system process. CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) describes a condition where a program reads data beyond the allocated end of a buffer, potentially exposing adjacent heap or stack memory to the caller. In this case, the DWM Core Library performs a read operation without sufficient bounds validation, allowing a local user-mode trigger to cause the library to return data outside its intended memory region. CPE data confirms the affected scope spans cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_10_version_1607 through cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_server_2019, and EUVD data extends confirmed affected ranges to Windows Server 2022 and Windows Server 2025. The vulnerability is tagged as Buffer Overflow in addition to the canonical CWE-125 classification, suggesting the root cause may involve a miscalculated buffer length check in a DWM rendering or compositing code path.

Know when Windows Server 2016 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CIRCL (temporal) 4.8 MEDIUM
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local attack vector and PR:L confirmed by 'authorized attacker locally' description; C:H for memory disclosure; no integrity or availability impact per CWE-125 read-only nature.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows dominates global enterprise desktop and server deployments.
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy