Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain low-privileged local foothold
-
DeliveryPlant symbolic link or junction
-
ExploitTrigger privileged RRAS file operation
-
ExecutionService follows link to protected path
-
PersistRedirect write to attacker-controlled target
-
ImpactExecute code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Symlink resolution safety
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local, authenticated access to a host where the Routing and Remote Access Service is present and reachable by the attacker's context - the CVSS vector AV:L/PR:L confirms the attacker must already hold a low-privilege account or code-execution foothold on the machine, so this is not remotely exploitable on its own. The attacker must be able to create filesystem links (symlinks/junctions/hard links) in a location the RRAS privileged operation will resolve, and must be able to trigger that operation. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: no network vector, no path from an unauthenticated attacker, dependence on the RRAS service being installed/running (common on VPN/routing servers, not on all endpoints), and the current absence of public exploit code (EPSS 0.28%, SSVC exploitation none, not automatable, not in KEV). It is most relevant on multi-user, terminal-server, and Server Core deployments where untrusted low-privilege users share the machine. |
| Impact | The signals are internally consistent and point to a moderate, patch-on-schedule priority rather than an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H yields 7.8 (High): exploitation is local (AV:L) and requires an existing low-privilege foothold (PR:L), but no user interaction, with total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - matching SSVC's 'Technical Impact: total'. Countering the high severity, EPSS is only 0.28% (20th percentile), SSVC lists 'Exploitation: none' and 'Automatable: no', KEV does not list it, and no public POC is identified - so real-world weaponization risk is currently low. The main caveat is that link-following EoPs in Windows are a well-trodden research area and frequently become reliable local exploits after patch diffing; the low EPSS reflects current absence of public code, not inherent difficulty. Net: prioritize for standard monthly patching, escalating for multi-user, terminal-server, and shared-workstation hosts where local low-privilege attackers are realistic. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A standard (non-admin) user or a low-privileged process that has already landed on a Windows host that runs RRAS plants a symbolic link or NTFS junction in a location the service will access, then triggers the privileged RRAS file operation so it follows the link into a protected path. By redirecting that write, the attacker overwrites or creates a file executed with SYSTEM privileges, escalating from limited user to full control of the machine. No public POC is identified at time of analysis, and the local-only vector with total technical impact makes this a classic post-compromise privilege-escalation step. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Jul 20, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) lets an already-authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L) abuse a symbolic-link/junction resolution flaw (CWE-59) to redirect a privileged file operation and gain SYSTEM-level control on affected Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012-2025 hosts. Microsoft has released patches; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not in CISA KEV, with a low EPSS of 0.28% (20th percentile). SSVC rates technical impact as total but marks exploitation as none and not automatable, consistent with a hands-on local escalation rather than a mass-exploitable remote bug.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an already-authenticated low-privileged user to abuse a link-following (symlink/junction) flaw to gain higher privileges on the host. The bug affects a broad range of client and server SKUs from Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 and Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H1, and Microsoft has shipped a fix. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-49791 via the standard monthly cumulative update, referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791 - Vendor-released patch: install at least the fixed build for your OS (for example 10.0.19045.7548 for Windows 10 22H2, 10.0.26100.8875 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.20348.5386 for Windows Server 2022, or 10.0.26100.33158 for Windows Server 2025). Because exploitation requires the RRAS service, hosts that do not need routing/VPN/dial-up should disable and stop the Routing and Remote Access service (services.msc / Stop-Service RemoteAccess), which removes the attack surface entirely with the trade-off of losing any RRAS-provided VPN, NAT, or routing on that machine. Where the service must run and patching is delayed, reduce the population of local low-privilege users on the affected host (e.g., on servers restrict interactive/console logon rights) since exploitation depends on an existing local foothold; this does not fix the flaw and only shrinks the attacker pool. Prioritize multi-user and Server Core systems and confirm the build number after patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 18 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
RRAS is the Windows service that provides routing, dial-up/VPN remote access, and NAT functionality, running with high privilege as part of the OS networking stack. The root cause is CWE-59, improper link resolution before file access ('link following'): the service accesses a file by path without safely validating that the path has not been redirected through a symbolic link, junction, or hard link controlled by a lower-privileged user. When a privileged process follows such an attacker-planted link, it can be tricked into writing to, creating, or overwriting a file the attacker could not otherwise touch, converting the service's privileges into arbitrary file operations. The CPE data confirms the affected components are Microsoft OS builds spanning Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (24H2, 25H2, 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations.
Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local attacker with an existing low-privilege account (AV:L/PR:L) abuses link following without user interaction to reach SYSTEM, yielding full C/I/A impact within an unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-49791 affects Windows RRAS (Routing and Remote Access Service) across Windows 10, 11, and Server versions, enabling local privilege escalation to SYSTEM-level control for any user with an existing account on affected systems. Microsoft has released patches; exploitation risk is low given the local-access requirement and absence of public exploit code, making this a manageable risk for typical enterprise environments.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Windows Server 2012
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit
EUVD-2026-43806
GHSA-6v4x-m393-5vg2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB