Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privileged AEM account
-
DeliverySubmit request with attacker-controlled URL
-
ExploitServer issues unauthorized internal request (SSRF)
-
ExecutionReach internal endpoint / escalate
-
PersistExecute code in current user context
-
ImpactHijack victim account or session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess a low-privileged authenticated session on the AEM instance (CVSS PR:L), and the attacker must be able to reach an AEM function that builds a server-side request from attacker-influenced input (the SSRF sink). No user interaction is required (UI:N) and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the mandatory authenticated foothold means fully anonymous internet exploitation is not indicated by the vector, and the value of the SSRF depends on what internal targets are reachable from the AEM host - deployments with strict egress filtering and no sensitive internal HTTP endpoints materially constrain the escalation to code execution. |
| Impact | The signals point to a genuine high priority but not an emergency. CVSS 3.1 is 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N): network-reachable, low attack complexity, no user interaction, scope changed, and high confidentiality/integrity impact - the PR:L means some authenticated foothold is required, which modestly tempers the raw score. No EPSS score was provided, so real-world exploitation probability cannot be quantified from this data. There is no CISA KEV entry and no POC referenced, so this is not confirmed as actively exploited - the severity is theoretical-but-serious rather than proven in-the-wild. One tension to verify: Adobe describes the impact as 'arbitrary code execution' yet the CVSS vector sets A:N (no availability impact) and S:C with C:H/I:H, which is consistent with an SSRF-driven account/session takeover and data-plane RCE rather than a host-crashing memory-corruption RCE - treat the 'RCE' label as escalation-via-SSRF in the current user's context, not unauthenticated root. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds a low-privileged AEM account (or has phished/obtained such credentials) submits a crafted request whose URL parameter is controlled, causing the AEM server to make an unauthorized server-side request to an internal endpoint. By targeting internal services reachable only from the AEM host, the attacker escalates the SSRF into code execution in the current user's context and takes over the victim's account or session - no user interaction is required. No public exploit code is referenced, so this reflects the low-complexity attack path implied by the CVSS vector rather than a published PoC. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Server-Side Request Forgery in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5 LTS, and 6.5) lets a low-privileged, authenticated attacker coerce the server into issuing crafted requests that can escalate to arbitrary code execution in the current user's context and hijack the victim's account or session. The scope-changed CVSS 9.6 rating reflects that the SSRF pivots beyond the vulnerable component itself. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV listing; risk is driven by CVSS severity and Adobe's confirmation via advisory APSB26-74 rather than observed exploitation.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fixes described in Adobe Security Bulletin APSB26-74 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html); the exact fixed build/service-pack number was not in the provided data, so confirm the target version directly from that bulletin - AEM as a Cloud Service customers should ensure they are on the current release, and 6.5 / 6.5 LTS operators should apply the corresponding service pack or cumulative fix pack. Because exploitation requires a low-privileged authenticated foothold, compensating controls until patching include tightening AEM author/publish access so only trusted, provisioned users hold accounts, and restricting network egress from AEM instances (deny outbound access to internal management ranges and cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254) to blunt the SSRF pivot - with the trade-off that egress filtering can break legitimate integrations (external DAM, replication, third-party services) and must be allow-listed carefully. Front AEM with a WAF/dispatcher rule set that constrains request parameters carrying URLs, noting this is defense-in-depth and not a substitute for the vendor fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): AEM accepts attacker-influenced input used to build an outbound request without adequately validating the destination, allowing the server to be steered toward attacker-chosen internal or external targets. AEM is a Java/OSGi (Apache Sling / Felix) enterprise content management platform, so an SSRF primitive is especially dangerous because it can reach internal management endpoints, cloud metadata services, or internal HTTP-invokable components - which per Adobe's description can escalate into code execution in the current user's context. The affected CPEs are cpe:2.3:a:adobe:adobe_experience_manager_as_a_cloud_service, cpe:2.3:a:adobe:adobe_experience_manager_6.5_lts, and cpe:2.3:a:adobe:adobe_experience_manager_6.5, spanning both the cloud service and the on-premises/AMS 6.5 lineage.
Know when Adobe Experience Manager As A Cloud Service gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network-reachable SSRF needing a low-privileged authenticated foothold (PR:L), no user interaction, scope changed to internal targets with high confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to issue unauthorized server-side requests, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) versions including Cloud Service, 6.5 LTS, and 6.5 contain a critical server-side request forgery vulnerability (CVSS 9.6) that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code and hijack victim accounts. Organizations relying on AEM for content management face operational disruption and potential exposure of sensitive customer data or administrative accounts. The lack of an available patch increases urgency for immediate compensating controls to reduce attack surface.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Network isolation-restrict AEM instance access to authenticated internal users only via firewall rules; (2) Access control-apply least-privilege principles to AEM user roles and restrict administrative permissions; (3) Audit logging-enable detailed logs for all authentication and administrative activity; (4) Web Application Firewall-configure rules to detect and alert on suspicious outbound requests indicative of SSRF exploitation; (5) User training-brief administrators on phishing and account compromise risks that could enable authenticated attacker access.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Sensitive file disclosure and potential account takeover in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5, and 6
Arbitrary file system read in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5 LTS, and 6.5) lets remote unauthenti
Missing authentication in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM as a Cloud Service, 6.5, and 6.5 LTS) lets a remote unauthentica
Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows a low-privileged authenticated attacker to inject persist
Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager enables a low-privileged authenticated attacker to inject persis
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject and execute
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows an authenticated attacker to manipulate client-side DO
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows authenticated network-accessible attackers to inject a
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows a low-privileged authenticated attacker to inject and
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows an authenticated attacker to inject and execute malici
DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting in Adobe Experience Manager allows a low-privileged network attacker to execute malicious
EUVD-2026-44387
GHSA-mqxm-pgxg-3pr2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB