Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach charging controller over network
-
DeliveryCraft malicious basemodule firmware image
-
ExploitAppend valid CRC32 checksum
-
ExecutionSubmit to unauthenticated update interface
-
PersistDevice flashes unsigned image
-
ImpactFull system compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The exploitable condition is the basemodule firmware update process itself, which accepts an image validated only by a CRC32 checksum with no cryptographic signature check - an attacker needs network reachability to that update interface and the ability to compute a valid CRC32 (trivial). Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), no authentication, no user interaction and no special configuration are required against default deployments. The primary limiting factor is exposure of the firmware-update/management interface: exploitation requires reaching that endpoint over the network, so devices isolated on segmented OT networks are far harder to reach, and the target must be running affected firmware in the 1.0.0-1.9.0 range. |
| Impact | All signals point to genuine high priority. The vendor CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.3 (critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N and high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact to the vulnerable system, indicating remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity exploitation against default configurations with no user interaction. The outcome - arbitrary firmware execution - is the maximal technical impact for an embedded device. No EPSS score was provided and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation yet; likewise no public POC was supplied, so this should not be treated as weaponized. The residual limiting factor is network reachability: exploitation requires the attacker to reach the device's firmware-update interface, which in well-segmented OT/charging networks may not be exposed to the public internet. Net: a real, patch-now issue whose realistic exposure depends heavily on network segmentation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network access to a CHARX SEC charging controller crafts a malicious basemodule firmware image, appends a correctly computed CRC32 checksum, and submits it through the firmware-update interface without needing any credentials. The device accepts and flashes the image, giving the attacker persistent, full control of the controller. No public POC has been identified, but the low attack complexity makes independent exploit development straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 30, 2026
Unauthenticated firmware implantation in Phoenix Contact CHARX SEC-3000/3050/3100/3150 EV charging controllers allows a remote attacker to push a modified firmware image to the basemodule because the update routine only checks a CRC32 checksum and performs no cryptographic signature verification (CWE-347). A successful upload yields full system compromise of the controller. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the flaw is network-reachable with no authentication and a vendor patch (v1.9.1) is available.
RemediationAI
Upgrade the basemodule firmware to version 1.9.1 or later, which is the vendor-released patch that closes the CRC32-only update path; the fix is documented in CERT@VDE advisory VDE-2026-008 (https://www.certvde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2026-008/). Until every affected CHARX SEC-3000/3050/3100/3150 unit is on 1.9.1, restrict network access to the controllers by placing them on an isolated OT/charging VLAN and blocking reachability of the firmware-update and management interface from untrusted networks and the internet (trade-off: this may complicate legitimate remote maintenance and OTA updates, which must then be performed from a controlled jump host). Additionally, monitor for and alert on unexpected firmware-upload attempts and logically restrict who can reach the update endpoint. These are compensating controls only - they reduce reachability but do not restore signature validation, so patching remains mandatory.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 4 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected devices are CHARX SEC series AC electric-vehicle charging controllers, the embedded control units that manage charging sessions and communication in EV charging stations. The vulnerability lies in the basemodule firmware update process, which uses CRC32 - an error-detection checksum, not a security primitive - as its only integrity gate. CRC32 provides no protection against intentional tampering because an attacker can freely recompute a valid checksum for any modified image. The root cause maps to CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature): the update path lacks a signed-firmware trust chain (e.g. an asymmetric signature validated against a vendor public key held on-device), so any well-formed image with a correct CRC32 is accepted and executed.
Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Remote unauthenticated firmware upload with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); accepting an unsigned image yields full device takeover, so C/I/A all High.
Primary rating from Vendor (cert).
CVSS VectorVendor: cert
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
The firmware update process for the basemodule of the charging controller only validates the CRC32 checksum without cryptographic signature verification. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to install a modified firmware, resulting in full system compromise.
Zero Day Initiative Advisories
Executive ViewAI
A critical vulnerability in Phoenix Contact CHARX EV charging controllers (models 3000/3050/3100/3150) permits unauthenticated remote firmware replacement, exposing charging infrastructure to full operational compromise. Organizations deploying these systems risk service outages and potential safety incidents. The attack requires no authentication and can be executed from the network, making this a high-urgency priority for EV charging operators and fleet managers.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Jwt Attack
View allWhy is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update
Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke
Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,
Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
Security feature bypass in Microsoft .NET (shipped via Visual Studio 2022 17.12/17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.7) lets
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT
Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a
A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti
A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27
A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work
EUVD-2026-51039
GHSA-fvfc-m52v-j2p2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB