Termix
CVE-2026-42454
CRITICAL
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Termix as low-priv user
-
DeliverySelect or reference a managed server
-
ExploitSend Docker endpoint request with malicious containerId
-
ExecutionShell metacharacters break out of docker command
-
Persistssh2 exec runs payload on remote host
-
ImpactArbitrary code execution on managed server
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires (1) an authenticated Termix account (CVSS PR:L - any valid low-privileged user, not necessarily admin), and (2) that the target host is registered as a managed server the account can reach through Termix. The concrete trigger is any Docker container-management endpoint that accepts the containerId path parameter or WebSocket message field on a version prior to 2.1.0; the attacker sets containerId to a value containing shell metacharacters. Limiting factors: valid credentials are needed (no unauthenticated path), the deployment must actually use Termix's Docker management feature against at least one managed server, and the affected version must be < 2.1.0. No admin role, no user interaction, and no non-default configuration beyond having managed servers are required. |
| Impact | The signals are mixed. CVSS 3.1 is 9.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H): network-reachable, low-complexity, only low privileges needed, no user interaction, and a scope change reflecting that code executes on downstream managed servers - a severe technical outcome (SSVC Technical Impact: total). Against that, exploitation-likelihood signals are low: EPSS is 0.07% (22nd percentile), SSVC records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and there is no public exploit identified. The PR:L requirement means an attacker must first hold a valid Termix account, and Termix is a niche product, so real-world mass exploitation is unlikely despite the near-maximal CVSS. This is a genuine priority for anyone actually running Termix (trivial for any authenticated user to weaponize) but not a broad internet-wide emergency. Note SSVC Automatable:no conflicts somewhat with AC:L/PR:L - injection itself is trivial, so 'automatable' likely reflects the need for prior authentication rather than exploit difficulty. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged but authenticated Termix user opens a Docker container view (or sends a WebSocket message) and supplies a container ID such as |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 24, 2026
Remote code execution in Termix (self-hosted web-based server management platform) before version 2.1.0 lets an authenticated user run arbitrary OS commands on any managed remote server. The Docker container-management endpoints pass the attacker-controlled containerId (from the URL path and WebSocket messages) straight into shell commands run over SSH via ssh2.Client.exec() with no sanitization, so a crafted container ID achieves full command injection. Rated CVSS 9.9 with no public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS is very low (0.07%) and it is not on CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Termix 2.1.0 or later (release-2.1.0-tag), which adds input sanitization/validation for container identifiers; download the platform build from https://github.com/Termix-SSH/Termix/releases/tag/release-2.1.0-tag and review advisory GHSA-c2g2-hqgq-6w9v. If immediate patching is not possible, treat every Termix account as capable of RCE on managed hosts: restrict Termix access to a minimal set of fully trusted operators, place the web UI behind a VPN or IP allowlist to shrink the authenticated-attacker pool, disable or block use of the Docker container-management feature/endpoints if unused, and reduce the privileges of the SSH credentials Termix uses on managed servers so a successful injection lands with least privilege rather than root. These controls limit blast radius but do not remove the injection, so upgrading remains the only real fix.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Termix orchestrates remote servers by opening SSH sessions (node.js ssh2 library) and invoking Docker CLI commands on those hosts. The flaw is a classic CWE-78 OS Command Injection: the containerId value is string-interpolated directly into the shell command string handed to ssh2.Client.exec(), which spawns a shell on the remote host. Because the remote side runs the composed string through a shell rather than executing an argv array, shell metacharacters (;, |, $(), backticks, &&) in the container ID break out of the intended docker command and execute attacker-supplied commands. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:termix-ssh:termix:*:* identifies all versions prior to the 2.1.0 fix as affected.
Know when Termix gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable endpoint, trivial injection (AC:L), any authenticated user (PR:L), no interaction; code runs on downstream managed hosts (S:C) giving full C/I/A on those systems.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
DescriptionCVE.org
Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. Prior to version 2.1.0, all Docker container management endpoints in Termix interpolate the containerId URL path parameter and WebSocket message field directly into shell commands executed via ssh2.Client.exec() on remote managed servers without any sanitization or validation. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands by crafting a malicious container ID, achieving Remote Code Execution on any managed server. This issue has been patched in version 2.1.0.
Executive ViewAI
Termix server management platform versions prior to 2.1.0 allow any authenticated user to execute arbitrary operating system commands on all managed infrastructure by exploiting unsanitized Docker container-management endpoints (CVSS 9.9). This creates a critical vulnerability to insider threats and account compromise, potentially enabling infrastructure-wide control through a single malicious or breached privileged user.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict Termix administrative console access using strong authentication and least-privilege principles; disable container-management API endpoints if operationally unnecessary; implement real-time alerting on container-management endpoint access and SSH command execution from Termix instances; segment Termix infrastructure from production systems; audit and strengthen privileged user credentials and access controls; monitor for anomalous shell command patterns in managed server SSH logs.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Unauthenticated attackers can retrieve stored SSH host credentials - including addresses, usernames, and passwords - fro
Stored XSS in Termix File Manager (versions 1.7.0-1.9.0) allows attackers with SSH server access to execute arbitrary Ja
Remote command execution in Termix web-based server management platform (versions prior to 2.3.2) allows any authenticat
OS command injection in Termix (self-hosted web SSH/tunneling platform) before 2.3.2 lets an authenticated user who can
OS command injection in Termix web-based server management platform prior to version 2.3.2 allows remote unauthenticated
Cross-user SSH credential disclosure in Termix, a self-hosted web server-management platform, allows an authenticated lo
Broken authorization in Termix (self-hosted web-based SSH/server management platform) before 2.6.1 lets any authenticate
Command injection in Termix 2.4.1 through 2.5.0 lets an authenticated administrator execute arbitrary operating-system c
Cross-tenant remote code execution in Termix (web-based SSH/file management platform) prior to version 2.3.2 allows an a
Command injection in Termix server management platform before version 2.3.2 allows authenticated users to execute arbitr
Remote command injection in Termix, a web-based SSH server management platform, allows any authenticated user with file-
Unauthorized data exposure in Termix prior to 2.3.2 allows a low-privileged authenticated user to exfiltrate password-re
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB