Skip to main content

GNCC GP5 CVE-2026-36178

| EUVDEUVD-2026-34280 MEDIUM
Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer (CWE-212)
2026-06-04 mitre GHSA-r43m-59f7-vgfp
4.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY
4.6 MEDIUM
AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Generated
Jun 04, 2026 - 16:50 vuln.today
CVSS changed
Jun 04, 2026 - 16:22 NVD
4.6 (None) 4.6 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Jun 04, 2026 - 00:00 nvd
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The factory reset functionality in GNCC GP5 v7.1.76 fails to clear sensitive cryptographic material in the JFFS2 configuration partition, possibly allowing attackers to recover and obtain sensitive user data.

AnalysisAI

Factory reset in GNCC GP5 firmware v7.1.76 fails to purge cryptographic material from the JFFS2 configuration partition, leaving sensitive user data recoverable after a reset operation. An attacker with physical access to a reset device - such as a discarded, resold, or stolen unit - can read the raw flash storage and extract retained secrets. No public exploit identified at time of analysis as KEV-confirmed active exploitation, though a publicly available proof-of-concept exists per SSVC data and researcher publication.

Technical ContextAI

The GNCC GP5 is an IoT-class device (likely a GPS tracker or similar consumer/fleet device) running firmware v7.1.76. Its persistent storage uses JFFS2 (Journalling Flash File System 2), a log-structured filesystem common in embedded Linux systems built on NOR/NAND flash. JFFS2's journaling and wear-leveling mechanisms can retain stale data blocks even after logical deletion, and a factory reset that only clears filesystem-layer records without performing a full low-level erase of the flash partition will leave cryptographic key material readable at the raw block level. CWE-212 (Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer) captures this class of flaw: the device's reset routine does not securely sanitize the configuration partition before returning the device to a factory state, violating the expectation that a reset destroys prior-owner secrets. CPE data provided is non-specific (n/a), limiting automated product tracking.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - no fix version is referenced in any of the provided sources, and the vendor advisory pages (http://gncc.com, http://gp5.com) were listed without specific advisory content. Until a firmware update is confirmed, organizations should avoid reselling, donating, or disposing of GNCC GP5 devices without performing a manual low-level flash erase beyond the built-in factory reset function; this requires physical disassembly and use of a flash programmer tool, which may be impractical for end users but feasible for IT asset managers. As a compensating control, operators should treat any returned or decommissioned GP5 unit as potentially containing live credentials and rotate any secrets (API keys, VPN credentials, user account tokens) that were provisioned to the device. The researcher's disclosure at https://github.com/BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/blob/main/GNCC-GP5-T23/README.md and VulDB entry https://vuldb.com/vuln/368353 should be monitored for patch announcements. Trade-off: a manual flash erase may render the device unbootable if done incorrectly, and credential rotation requires knowing which secrets were loaded on each device.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

Share

CVE-2026-36178 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy