Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker deploys malicious Telnet server
  2. Delivery
    Victim enables Telnet Client feature (or it is pre-enabled)
  3. Exploit
    Social engineering lures victim to connect
  4. Execution
    Victim initiates Telnet session to attacker server
  5. Persist
    Server sends crafted response triggering OOB read
  6. Impact
    Client process memory partially disclosed

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target system has the Windows Telnet Client optional feature installed and enabled - this feature is NOT installed by default on modern Windows 10/11 or Windows Server systems and must be explicitly activated by an administrator or user. Additionally, the victim must actively initiate a Telnet connection (TCP port 23) to an attacker-controlled server; the attacker cannot reach the client without this user-driven action (UI:R in CVSS). The CVSS PR:N indicates no authentication to the target system is required from the attacker's perspective - they simply need to host the malicious Telnet server endpoint. Limiting factors: Telnet Client must be explicitly enabled (non-default), user must voluntarily connect to the malicious endpoint, exploitation is not automatable per CISA SSVC, and the OOB read yields only low confidentiality and low availability impact with no integrity consequence.

Impact

Multiple risk signals converge on a low-to-moderate real-world priority. The CVSS base score of 5.4 (Medium) is driven by the network attack vector and zero privilege requirement, but UI:R and the low impact ratings correctly constrain the score. EPSS at 0.05% (16th percentile) indicates near-zero observed exploitation probability across the threat intelligence community. CISA SSVC concurs: Exploitation is rated 'none', Automatable is 'no' (user interaction blocks mass scanning), and Technical Impact is 'partial'. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV. No POC is publicly identified at time of analysis. The primary risk is targeted social engineering - an attacker convincing a user to Telnet to a malicious server - rather than opportunistic mass exploitation. The Telnet Client is an optional Windows feature not installed by default on modern systems, further limiting the realistic attack surface. The CVSS Availability impact of A:L may reflect the potential for the OOB read to crash the client process, but this is non-persistent. Overall, this is a low-priority patching item for most organizations unless Telnet Client is actively used in operational workflows.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker operates a malicious Telnet server and socially engineers a Windows user - for example, via a phishing email referencing a legacy system - into connecting using the Windows Telnet Client. Upon connection, the server transmits a specially crafted response sequence that triggers the out-of-bounds read in the client's protocol parser, potentially leaking a small region of the client process's memory and causing the Telnet session to become unstable or terminate. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the requirement for active user initiation prevents automated mass exploitation.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in the Windows Telnet Client exposes memory contents and minor availability degradation to network-based attackers who control a Telnet server endpoint. Affected systems span Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (22H3 through 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, all requiring user interaction to initiate a Telnet session against a malicious server. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV); EPSS stands at 0.05% (16th percentile), reinforcing that real-world exploitation risk is low despite the broad platform footprint.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the Microsoft security update corresponding to your Windows version via Windows Update or WSUS; exact fixed builds are documented in the EUVD-2026-29631 and MSRC entries (e.g., Windows 11 22H3/23H2 fixed at 10.0.22631.7079, Windows 10 22H2 fixed at 10.0.19045.7291, Windows Server 2025 fixed at 10.0.26100.32860 - see full version map above). The MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35423 provides the authoritative patch mapping. As a compensating control where patching is not immediately possible, disable the Windows Telnet Client optional feature via 'Turn Windows features on or off' or via DISM ('dism /online /Disable-Feature /FeatureName:TelnetClient'); this eliminates the attack surface entirely but will break any workflows depending on the Telnet Client. Additionally, restrict outbound TCP/23 at the network perimeter to prevent users from initiating Telnet sessions to external or untrusted hosts. Note that Telnet transmits credentials in cleartext regardless of this CVE, so disabling or replacing it with SSH is the recommended long-term posture.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8755
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26079
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9140
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9140
Windows 11 version 22H3 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7079
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23181
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32860
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23181
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8755
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7291
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7079
Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) 10.0.25398.0 <10.0.25398.2330
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8755
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2113
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7291
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26079
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9140
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8457
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5139
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8457
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32860

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9140
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.8755
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7291
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7291
euvd windows_11_version_22h3 fix: 10.0.22631.7079
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7079
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8457
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8457
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2113
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26079
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23181
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23181
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26079
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9140
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9140
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8755
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8755
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5139
euvd windows_server_2022_23h2_edition_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.25398.2330
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32860
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32860

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 21 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerable component is the Windows Telnet Client, an optional feature (historically telnet.exe) present across a wide range of Windows releases as identified by CPE strings spanning cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_10_version_1607 through cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:windows_server_2012. The root cause is CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read): the Telnet protocol parser reads beyond the allocated buffer boundary when processing server-supplied data, enabling disclosure of adjacent memory and potential minor application instability. The CWE-125 class is distinct from a write primitive; it does not directly enable code execution under typical exploitation conditions. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L is consistent with a client-side flaw triggered when a user connects to a crafted server over the network, with no integrity impact and only limited confidentiality and availability consequences.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Network vector confirmed by Telnet protocol; UI:R required as user must initiate connection; no integrity impact from read-only OOB; A:L reflects potential client crash.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Telnet Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
optional Windows feature, disabled by default on modern systems
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy