Skip to main content

EVBEE DC-80 CVE-2026-22097

| EUVDEUVD-2026-43331 CRITICAL
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-07-13 DIVD
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: DIVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach DC-80 firmware update interface
  2. Delivery
    Bypass or forge JWT authorization
  3. Exploit
    Upload unsigned malicious firmware
  4. Execution
    Device installs without signature check
  5. Persist
    Execute attacker code on charger
  6. Impact
    Pivot to connected charging systems

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the EVBEE DC-80 firmware update capability and the ability to submit a firmware image to it; the missing cryptographic signature validation means no valid vendor signing key is needed for the image to be accepted. The 'Jwt Attack' tag indicates the update interface is protected by JWT-based authorization, so exploitation in practice depends on either holding valid access to the update function or forging/bypassing that JWT - the official vector rates this PR:N, implying that authorization barrier is considered weak or bypassable, but this should be verified against the specific deployment. Exploitation is limited by whether the update/management interface is exposed beyond a trusted network: a DC-80 whose update endpoint is confined to an isolated management segment is not reachable by an unauthenticated internet attacker despite the network-vector rating.

Impact

The signals point to a genuinely high-priority issue. The DIVD-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H with subsequent-system SC:L/SI:L/SA:L, score 9.3) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact plus some spillover to connected systems. That said, the description qualifies exploitation as available to 'anyone with access to the firmware update capability,' which is in mild tension with PR:N - the PR:N rating appears to rely on the JWT-based authorization being weak or bypassable rather than the endpoint being wholly open, so defenders should verify whether the update interface is exposed and whether a JWT weakness truly removes the auth barrier. No EPSS score was provided, the CVE is not in CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active or automated exploitation yet; real-world risk is currently driven by the severity of impact rather than confirmed in-the-wild activity, and is bounded by how many DC-80 units expose the update interface to untrusted networks.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach the DC-80's network-exposed firmware update interface - potentially after abusing a JWT authorization weakness to gain access - uploads a crafted firmware image containing a malicious payload. Because the updater performs no signature verification, the device installs and runs the attacker's code, yielding full control of the charger and a foothold to affect connected charging or management systems. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, so an attacker would need to weaponize the flaw themselves.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 13, 2026

Arbitrary code execution in the EVBEE DC-80 EV charging station stems from a firmware update mechanism that ships without cryptographic signature validation (CWE-347), letting an attacker who reaches the update capability push a malicious firmware image and have it executed by the device. Reported by DIVD (advisory DIVD-2026-00001) with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and a 'Jwt Attack' angle noted in triage tags, the flaw grants full compromise of the charger. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed firmware version is identified in the provided data, so remediation should center on compensating controls until the vendor publishes signed firmware: place DC-80 chargers on an isolated management VLAN and block inbound access to the firmware update / management interface from untrusted networks and the internet, restricting it to a trusted administrative host or VPN (trade-off: legitimate remote firmware pushes must then originate from that controlled path). Because the 'Jwt Attack' tag implicates the authorization layer, rotate or invalidate any static or predictable JWT signing secrets and enforce short token lifetimes if configurable, and monitor the update endpoint for unexpected upload attempts. Track DIVD advisory DIVD-2026-00001 (https://csirt.divd.nl/DIVD-2026-00001/) for the official fix and, once available, upgrade to the vendor's signed-firmware release. Note that network isolation is the most reliable operator-side mitigation here, since the underlying missing-signature-check flaw cannot be closed without vendor firmware.

Affected VersionsENISA

DC-80 0 <1.5.1

Affected Packages

euvd dc_80 fix: 1.5.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the firmware update pathway of the EVBEE DC-80, a network-reachable DC electric-vehicle charging unit (CPE cpe:2.3:a:evbee:dc-80). The root cause is CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature): the updater accepts and installs firmware images without verifying an authenticity/integrity signature, so it cannot distinguish vendor-signed firmware from attacker-supplied files. Combined with the 'Jwt Attack' tag, this suggests the update endpoint's authorization is JWT-based and may be forgeable or bypassable, allowing an attacker to reach an interface that then trusts any uploaded binary. Because uploaded firmware runs with the device's own privileges after installation, an unsigned upload converts directly into arbitrary code execution on the embedded controller.

Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (DIVD) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L
vuln.today AI 10.0 CRITICAL

Network-reachable updater with no signature check and JWT-bypassable authorization gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N; unsigned firmware install yields full C:H/I:H/A:H, and code execution reaching connected charging systems supports S:C.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (DIVD).

CVSS VectorVendor: DIVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Jul 13, 2026 - 12:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Jul 13, 2026 - 09:10 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

The firmware update mechanism does not include cryptographic signature validation. This allows anyone with access to the firmware update capability to upload arbitrary files which can then lead to arbitrary code execution.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The EVBEE DC-80 EV charging station contains a critical vulnerability that allows attackers to install and execute malicious firmware, achieving complete device compromise; no public exploit code is currently identified, but the technical barrier to exploitation is low. Organizations operating these chargers face operational disruption, loss of charging service availability, and potential safety implications if devices are compromised.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: implement network segmentation isolating chargers from untrusted networks and restricting update access to controlled administrative channels only, disable remote update capabilities where operationally feasible, require multi-factor approval and manual authorization for all firmware updates, maintain comprehensive audit logging of all update attempts and access, and keep asset inventory current to enable rapid patch deployment upon vendor release.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 81% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche single-vendor DC EV charger model, limited deployment footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2013-3900 MEDIUM
5.5 Dec 11

Why is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update

CVE-2026-48558 CRITICAL POC
9.5 Jun 12

Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-5430 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Aug 06

Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,

CVE-2025-59718 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 09

Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2025-25291 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2025-25292 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2022-25898 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 01

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT

CVE-2026-107722 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 08

Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a

CVE-2024-42004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti

CVE-2024-41145 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27

CVE-2024-41138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work

CVE-2024-45409 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 10

The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), t

References

Advisories & patches

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy