Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Attacker deploys or compromises rpcbind endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Lures admin to query endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Admin runs `rpcinfo -s <malicious-host>`
  4. Install
    Client sends RPCBPROC_DUMP RPC request
  5. C2
    Malicious reply delivers oversized version data
  6. Execute
    Stack buffer overflows in rpcbdump()
  7. Impact
    rpcinfo client process crashes

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concurrent conditions: (1) the attacker must control or have compromised a remote rpcbind endpoint capable of returning a crafted RPCBPROC_DUMP reply with version-number data that exceeds the fixed stack buffer in rpcbdump(); and (2) a user or administrator on the victim system must actively run rpcinfo -s <attacker-endpoint> - the vulnerability is not triggered by passive network exposure or inbound connections to the victim. The rpcinfo -s short-mode flag is the specific code path that invokes the vulnerable rpcbdump() function; other rpcinfo modes are not implicated. The impact is strictly limited to the rpcinfo client process crash; neither the host rpcbind daemon, the kernel, nor any other process is affected (S:U). Exploitation is further limited to RHEL 8/9/10 and OpenShift Container Platform 4 systems with the unpatched rpcbind package installed.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5 (Medium) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H accurately captures the threat model: the attack is network-reachable but requires active user interaction (UI:R), and the only impact is availability loss (A:H) of the rpcinfo client process itself, not the host or any daemon. Scope is Unchanged (S:U), confirming that even a successful overflow does not escape the rpcinfo process. EPSS data was not provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified; however, the manual trigger requirement (an admin must deliberately run rpcinfo -s against an attacker-controlled endpoint) significantly constrains real-world exploitability. No KEV listing and no POC are reported, which is consistent with the narrow exploitation window. The net assessment is a low-priority, real but bounded issue: administrators who use rpcinfo for diagnostics against untrusted or internet-facing RPC endpoints are at risk, whereas environments where rpcinfo is only run against internal, trusted infrastructure face negligible exposure. CVSS does not penalize for the implausibility of an admin targeting a malicious server, so the real-world risk is somewhat lower than the CVSS score implies.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker deploys a rogue rpcbind service on an internet-accessible host (or compromises an existing one) and configures it to return a RPCBPROC_DUMP response containing an abnormally large number of version entries. An administrator troubleshooting RPC connectivity issues runs rpcinfo -s <attacker-host>, causing rpcinfo to call rpcbdump() in short mode, overflow the fixed stack buffer with the attacker-supplied version data, and crash. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at the time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 21, 2026

Stack-based buffer overflow in rpcbind's rpcinfo client utility crashes the rpcinfo process when a user or administrator runs rpcinfo -s against a malicious or compromised rpcbind endpoint. The flaw is in the rpcbdump() short-mode function, which writes version number data from a remote RPCBPROC_DUMP reply into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds validation. Affected deployments span Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, 9, and 10 as well as OpenShift Container Platform 4; no public exploit has been identified and this vulnerability does not appear in the CISA KEV catalog, placing real-world urgency in the medium tier despite the network-accessible attack vector.

RemediationAI

Apply the Red Hat-issued rpcbind package update addressing CVE-2026-16461 via dnf update rpcbind on affected RHEL 8, 9, and 10 systems; monitor the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-16461 for the specific fixed package version, which was not independently confirmed in the available data. For OpenShift Container Platform 4, follow the OCP-specific errata linked from the same advisory. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict use of rpcinfo -s to queries against known-trusted, internally managed rpcbind endpoints only - avoid running it against any external, cloud-hosted, or third-party RPC servers. Because the flaw only affects the rpcinfo client and not the rpcbind daemon itself, no firewall changes or daemon restarts are required for hosts that are acting as rpcbind servers. The trade-off of restricting rpcinfo usage is reduced diagnostic capability for RPC service enumeration across untrusted network segments, which is a reasonable operational trade-off given the low exploitability in controlled environments.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

rpcbind is the ONC RPC port-mapping service present on most Linux distributions, used by NFS, NIS, and other RPC-based services to map program numbers to network ports. The rpcinfo utility is a diagnostic client that queries rpcbind endpoints; its -s flag invokes short-mode output via the rpcbdump() function, which issues a RPCBPROC_DUMP RPC call and iterates over the returned program/version list. CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow) identifies the root cause: version numbers from the server response are written sequentially into a statically allocated stack buffer without checking whether the incoming data exceeds its bounds. Because the buffer resides on the stack, overflow can corrupt the return address or saved frame pointers, resulting in a crash (denial of service) of the rpcinfo client process. Affected CPEs confirm the flaw in cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8, rhel_9, rhel_10, and openshift_container_platform_4. No heap or kernel-mode code paths are implicated; the scope of impact is restricted to the userspace rpcinfo client process.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network vector because the malicious server is remote; PR:N because no victim-side privileges are required; UI:R because an admin must actively run rpcinfo -s; A:H for client crash; C and I are N as no data exfiltration or modification occurs.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A stack-based buffer overflow was found in rpcbind's rpcinfo utility. In rpcbdump() short mode (used by rpcinfo -s), version numbers from a remote RPCBPROC_DUMP reply are written into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking. A user or administrator who runs rpcinfo -s against a malicious or compromised rpcbind endpoint could experience a crash or denial of service of the rpcinfo client.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 86% exploitable
Prevalence
High
rpcbind ships by default on most RHEL and RHEL-derivative enterprise Linux deployments
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
High

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_openshift_container_platform_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SLES15-SP5-CHOST-BYOS-SAP-CCloud Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS-Aliyun Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS-Azure Affected
SLES15-SP6-CHOST-BYOS-EC2 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy