Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLegitimate admin generates Recovery Kit response file
-
DeliveryResponse file stored or transmitted insecurely
-
ExploitAttacker obtains file copy via share or insider access
-
ExecutionReads Azure Key Vault client secret in cleartext
-
PersistAuthenticates to Azure Key Vault with extracted secret
-
ImpactExfiltrates or abuses vault-protected secrets
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires three concurrent conditions: (1) Devolutions Server must be running an affected version (below 2026.1.23 in the 2026.1.x branch or below 2026.2.12 in the 2026.2.x branch) with an Azure Key Vault client secret configured in its integration settings; (2) a legitimate user (UI:R per CVSS) must have initiated Recovery Kit response file generation - the vulnerability is triggered at generation time, not at runtime; (3) the attacker must obtain read access to the generated response file, whether through insider access, a compromised host with file share access, insecure backup storage, or accidental distribution. The 'exclude sensitive data' option being selected is explicitly stated as insufficient to prevent exposure - this is notable because administrators who believe they opted out of sensitive data inclusion are the most likely to mishandle the output file. Exploitation is bounded by file access: it cannot be triggered remotely over the network and does not affect Devolutions Server instances that have not configured the Azure Key Vault integration. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.3 (Low) base score reflects a local attack vector (AV:L), no privileges required on the Devolutions Server itself (PR:N), and mandatory user interaction (UI:R) - all of which constrain exploitability. EPSS data was not included in the provided intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from that signal. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit code has been identified, placing this firmly in the 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' category. The CVSS PR:N metric warrants careful interpretation: an attacker needs no Devolutions Server privileges, but does require physical or logical access to the generated response file - a non-trivial prerequisite that is not captured by the raw vector. The critical risk amplifier here is credential exposure: a single extracted Azure Key Vault client secret can unlock access to all secrets stored in the associated vault, making the downstream confidentiality and integrity impact on Azure infrastructure disproportionately high relative to the base score. Real-world prioritization should be elevated for any organization using Devolutions Server's Azure Key Vault integration, particularly if response files are stored in shared directories, transmitted over email, or backed up without encryption. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An administrator on an affected Devolutions Server instance generates a Recovery Kit response file and, trusting the 'exclude sensitive data' option, stores it in a shared internal network location for disaster recovery purposes. An insider threat or an attacker who has compromised a low-privileged workstation with access to that share opens the file in a text editor and reads the Azure Key Vault client secret in cleartext. The attacker then authenticates directly to Azure Key Vault using the extracted secret and exfiltrates all secrets stored within the vault. No public exploit code has been identified; the attack requires only file read access and no specialized tooling. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 15, 2026
Devolutions Server 2026.1.22.0 and 2026.2.11.0 exposes Azure Key Vault client secrets in cleartext within Recovery Kit response files, defeating an explicit 'exclude sensitive data' option that administrators rely on. Any party who obtains a copy of the generated response file can trivially read the credential without any decryption or tooling. No public exploit code exists and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV; however, because successful exploitation yields a reusable cloud credential, the downstream blast radius in Azure environments substantially exceeds what the 3.3 CVSS base score suggests. A vendor-released patch is available.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Devolutions Server to version 2026.1.23 or later (for 2026.1.x deployments) or to version 2026.2.12 or later (for 2026.2.x deployments), as documented in the vendor advisory at https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0024/. For organizations that cannot patch immediately, restrict filesystem permissions on Recovery Kit response files to only the generating administrator account and ensure the files are not stored in shared network locations or transmitted unencrypted. Critically, any organization that has generated a Recovery Kit response file using an affected version should treat the Azure Key Vault client secret as compromised: rotate the secret in the Azure portal immediately and audit Azure Key Vault access logs for unauthorized API calls. Note that rotating the Azure Key Vault client secret requires updating the Devolutions Server configuration with the new credential before resuming normal operations. Do not regenerate Recovery Kit files on unpatched versions as a workaround - the flaw is in the generation code path itself.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Devolutions Server is an enterprise Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform that centralizes credential and secrets management. Its Recovery Kit feature generates response files intended for disaster recovery scenarios and exposes an option to exclude sensitive data from those exports. The root cause is CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor): the code path responsible for sanitizing the output file when the exclusion option is selected fails to strip the Azure Key Vault client secret, writing it to disk in cleartext. The Azure Key Vault integration references both Microsoft (Azure) and HashiCorp tagging in the intelligence data, indicating the affected surface spans cloud key management configurations. Affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, covering all Server builds below 2026.2.12 in the 2026.2.x branch and below 2026.1.23 in the 2026.1.x branch per EUVD-2026-44365.
Know when Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Local file access is the attack vector; PR:N reflects the attacker needing no Devolutions Server privileges, only file access; C:L because a single Azure credential is exposed with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (DEVOLUTIONS).
CVSS VectorVendor: DEVOLUTIONS
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Insertion of sensitive information into a file in the Recovery Kit response file generation feature in Devolutions Server 2026.1.22.0, 2026.2.11.0 allows an attacker with access to the generated response file to obtain the Azure Key Vault client secret in cleartext, even when the option to exclude sensitive data is selected.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Traccar Traccar Server version 4.0 and earlier contains a CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injectio
Account takeover in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 lets a low-privileged organization member steal any oth
Full user impersonation in the Laci Synchroni sync server (backend prior to 1.2.3) lets an attacker take over any accoun
Provider service users in Bitwarden Server Cloud can hijack arbitrary organizations via unauthorized API endpoint access
NoMachine Server is affected by Integer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack compl
NoMachine Server is affected by Buffer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack comple
Authentication bypass in Bitwarden Server versions prior to 2026.4.1 allows authenticated users with SCIM management pri
JetAudio jetCast Server 2.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Log Directory configuration fiel
Credential-holding attackers can completely bypass TOTP two-factor authentication on Sync-in Server versions prior to 2.
A broken authentication vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server software v17, v18, v19 R7, and earlier allows attackers to sen
An information disclosure vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server Application v17, v18, v19 R7 and earlier allows attackers to
Privilege escalation in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.5.0 lets an authenticated organization member holding a
EUVD-2026-44365
GHSA-wv55-rmpm-fhq6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB