Skip to main content

Google Chrome CVE-2026-113299

| EUVDEUVD-2026-105716 HIGH
Buffer Overflow (CWE-119)
2026-10-20 chrome-cve-admin@google.com GHSA-2jx6-gm48-xxmq
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: google
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to crafted HTML page
  2. Delivery
    Deliver malformed content to WebProtect
  3. Exploit
    Trigger memory corruption (CWE-119)
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary code within renderer sandbox
  5. Impact
    Access in-sandbox browser data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to open attacker-controlled HTML content in a vulnerable Chrome build (prior to 156.0.8078.47) - reflected in CVSS UI:R, so user interaction (visiting/rendering a page) is mandatory and there is no server-side or zero-click vector. Per PR:N the attacker is unauthenticated and needs no account or prior access. The decisive LIMITING factor is that code execution is contained within the Chrome renderer sandbox: full host compromise is NOT achievable from this flaw alone and would require chaining an additional sandbox-escape vulnerability. No special non-default browser configuration is indicated as required.

Impact

Signals conflict sharply and must be weighed carefully. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) depicts a high-severity, network-reachable, no-privilege flaw needing only that a victim open a crafted HTML page - the classic drive-by browser profile. However, Google's own Chromium rating is explicitly 'Low', and the description qualifies the outcome as code execution 'inside the sandbox', meaning the attacker gains execution only within Chrome's renderer sandbox rather than full host compromise. That containment is why the vendor downgrades real-world impact despite the memory-corruption primitive (CWE-119), and it is the single most important nuance here: a sandbox-confined RCE typically requires a second sandbox-escape bug to be dangerous, so the 8.8 overstates standalone risk. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The CVE is NOT on CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so this is not a confirmed in-the-wild threat. Net assessment: patch-worthy and genuinely remote/unauthenticated, but closer to a medium real-world priority than its 8.8 suggests - a 'high-CVSS, vendor-rated-low' case driven almost entirely by sandbox containment. Verify impact scope with the Chrome release notes before escalating.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker hosts a malicious web page (or injects malicious content into an ad or compromised site) that triggers the WebProtect memory-corruption bug when a victim's Chrome browser renders it. Successful exploitation yields arbitrary code execution confined to the renderer sandbox, which on its own exposes in-process browser data but requires a separate sandbox-escape to reach the host OS. No public exploit code is referenced at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026

Memory corruption in Google Chrome's WebProtect component (versions prior to 156.0.8078.47) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker who convinces a victim to render a crafted HTML page potentially execute arbitrary code inside the renderer sandbox. Exploitation requires user interaction per CVSS UI:R, and the flaw alone does not permit host compromise - escaping the sandbox would require chaining a separate vulnerability. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified in the provided intelligence, and Google rates the Chromium security severity as Low despite the 8.8 CVSS base score.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Google Chrome to version 156.0.8078.47 or later, which is the vendor-released fix documented in the Chrome stable-channel advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html. Use Chrome's built-in auto-update or the organization's software distribution tooling, then fully restart the browser and verify the installed version via chrome://version; enterprise administrators should enforce update policies so managed endpoints cannot remain on builds below 156.0.8078.47. Until the update is deployed, restrict browsing of untrusted HTML content and keep the Chrome sandbox and site isolation enabled - disabling either would increase the impact of a successful renderer compromise and is not a safe workaround. These compensating controls reduce exposure but do not fix the memory-corruption flaw itself.

Affected VersionsENISA

Chrome 156.0.8078.47 <156.0.8078.47

Affected Packages

euvd chrome fix: 156.0.8078.47

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This is a CWE-119 improper-restriction-of-operations-within-the-bounds-of-a-memory-buffer issue in Chrome's WebProtect component, a browser subsystem that processes web content. A memory-safety error triggered while rendering a crafted HTML page can corrupt memory in the renderer process; because the renderer is sandboxed, the immediate impact is arbitrary code execution within that restricted process rather than on the host operating system. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity attack that requires the victim to visit or render attacker-controlled content, with no authentication or prior access needed, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact if code execution is achieved inside the sandbox. The Chromium severity rating of Low is consistent with the sandbox containment and the likely need for a separate sandbox-escape chain to reach the host; no CPE strings were supplied in the input, and EUVD identifies Chrome 156.0.8078.47 as the fixed version boundary.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (google) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Remote crafted page needs no privileges (PR:N) but requires the victim to load it (UI:R); memory corruption yields high C/I/A, though execution stays sandbox-confined so scope is unchanged (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (google).

CVSS VectorVendor: google

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 20, 2026 - 23:23 NVD
8.8 (HIGH)
Patch available
Oct 20, 2026 - 23:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 20, 2026 - 22:19 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Memory corruption in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Google Chrome versions prior to 156.0.8078.47 contain a memory-corruption flaw in the WebProtect component that could allow code execution inside the browser's renderer sandbox when a user renders a crafted HTML page. The business exposure is concentrated in endpoint browser use rather than direct host takeover, since escaping the sandbox would require chaining a separate vulnerability, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Leadership should prioritize broad Chrome update hygiene because of the product's widespread deployment and the potential for user-driven compromise to disrupt productivity and endpoint integrity.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 58% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Google Chrome is the dominant desktop browser worldwide
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy