Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to crafted HTML page
-
ExploitPage renders in Chrome Accessibility component
-
ExecutionTrigger memory corruption (CWE-119)
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code in renderer sandbox
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a victim using Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 to load attacker-controlled HTML that exercises the browser's Accessibility feature path - reflected in UI:R, the user must navigate to or open the crafted page. No authentication is required (PR:N). The key LIMITING factor is sandbox containment: the description explicitly states code executes 'inside the sandbox,' so a standalone exploit does not reach the host OS or other processes (S:U) and would need to be chained with a separate sandbox-escape vulnerability for full system compromise. Patched builds (156.0.8078.47 and later) are not affected. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely high-priority patching item for any organization running Chrome, though the real-world risk sits a notch below worst-case full-host RCE. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring only that a victim visit a crafted HTML page - the classic drive-by browser exploitation model. A critical limiting signal is in the description itself: code execution is 'inside the sandbox' (consistent with S:U, scope unchanged), meaning a successful exploit yields control of the renderer process but NOT the host unless chained with a separate sandbox-escape bug. Exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score, and no POC in the provided data, so this is not confirmed as actively exploited and should not be treated as a zero-day. However, memory-corruption bugs in Chrome's Accessibility subsystem are historically high-value targets, and Chromium rating this 'Critical' internally signals strong exploitability. Net: prioritize because of ubiquitous deployment and low attack complexity, but calibrate urgency down from an actively-exploited KEV item since no exploitation or POC evidence is present. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing malicious HTML that triggers a memory-corruption bug in Chrome's Accessibility component, then lures a victim to visit it (phishing link, malvertising, or watering-hole). When the page renders, the attacker gains arbitrary code execution within the Chrome renderer sandbox. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and with AV:N/AC:L/UI:R the only barrier is getting the victim to load the page. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026
Memory corruption in Google Chrome's Accessibility implementation before version 156.0.8078.47 lets remote attackers execute arbitrary code at Chrome's sandbox privilege level by convincing a victim to open a crafted HTML page. Unauthenticated attackers can trigger the flaw through normal browsing, and because code execution is confined to the renderer sandbox, achieving host-level compromise requires chaining a separate sandbox-escape vulnerability. Google rates this Critical (Chromium severity) with a CVSS of 8.8; a vendor patch is available and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Google Chrome 156.0.8078.47 or later - vendor-released patch: 156.0.8078.47, documented in the Chrome Releases stable-channel advisory (https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html) and tracked as https://issues.chromium.org/issues/570093145. Prioritize the update on endpoints that browse untrusted or internet-facing content, and verify version compliance programmatically rather than relying on users to restart browsers. Where immediate rollout is impossible, interim controls should target the attack vector: restrict exposure to untrusted HTML through URL filtering and email/web gateway inspection of HTML attachments, and use enterprise policy to keep Chrome on the managed update channel. Note the trade-off that disabling Chrome's accessibility features (via --disable-renderer-accessibility or the accessibility-related enterprise policies) reduces exposure to this specific code path but degrades or breaks assistive-technology support for users who depend on it, so it is suitable only as a short-lived measure on high-risk segmented hosts. Because the vulnerability only yields code execution inside the sandbox, hardening against sandbox escape - keeping site isolation enabled, minimizing exposed native services, and maintaining OS-level patches - limits post-exploitation impact; disabling site isolation to improve compatibility would directly undermine that containment and should not be considered.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is classified as CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and sits in Chrome's Accessibility subsystem, the layer that exposes DOM and UI structure to assistive technologies and to platform accessibility APIs. Crafted HTML reaches this code path when Chrome builds or updates the accessibility tree, and malformed input drives an out-of-bounds memory access that corrupts renderer memory. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H describes a remote, low-complexity attack with no authentication requirement that nonetheless needs user interaction (the victim must load attacker-controlled HTML). Scope is Unchanged, which aligns with the advisory wording that code execution occurs 'inside the sandbox' - the compromised renderer remains subject to Chrome's site-isolation and sandbox boundaries, so full host compromise requires a second, separate sandbox-escape bug. Google classified this as Chromium security severity Critical.
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remote crafted page with no auth (AV:N/PR:N) and user must visit it (UI:R); code runs within the renderer sandbox so scope is unchanged (S:U) with high renderer-level C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Memory corruption in Accessibility in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome versions prior to 156.0.8078.47 carry a high-severity browser flaw that could allow malicious web content to run code within Chrome's protective sandbox, affecting employees who browse the internet. Given Chrome's broad deployment, leadership should treat version compliance as an urgent operational priority; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and host-level compromise would require an additional exploit chain.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-105619
GHSA-2jq2-hg39-chq7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB