Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to attacker-controlled page
-
DeliveryServe crafted HTML content
-
ExploitTrigger memory corruption in PolicyContainer
-
ExecutionEscape browser sandbox
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a victim using a vulnerable Google Chrome desktop build (any version prior to 156.0.8078.47) to actively load an attacker-controlled HTML page that triggers the memory-corruption flaw in the PolicyContainer component - the CVSS UI:R metric confirms this user-interaction requirement, which is the primary limiting factor. No authentication or special Chrome configuration is indicated (PR:N, default rendering path), and no non-default feature toggle is named in the description. The practical limiter is that the attacker must drive the target to malicious web content and, per the description, the bug only 'potentially' achieves code execution outside the sandbox, implying exploitation may not be fully reliable; the Chromium 'Medium' internal severity reinforces that weaponization is non-trivial. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and should be weighed carefully. The NVD CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.6 (Critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, indicating a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw requiring only that a victim load a crafted HTML page, with a scope change reflecting the claimed sandbox escape. However, Google/Chromium explicitly rated this issue 'Medium' severity, a notable divergence from the 9.6 NVD score - this gap is common for Chromium bugs where the practical exploitability (e.g., requiring chaining or being hard to weaponize) is lower than the theoretical impact, and it should temper prioritization rather than being treated as a pure Critical. No EPSS score, SSVC decision data, KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV). Net assessment: a genuinely serious client-side RCE/sandbox-escape class issue in an ubiquitous product that warrants prompt patching, but the Chromium 'Medium' rating and absence of exploitation signals suggest this is not a fire-drill emergency compared to a KEV-listed browser 0-day. The CVSS-vs-Chromium-severity conflict should be flagged to stakeholders. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing specially crafted HTML that triggers memory corruption in Chrome's PolicyContainer component when rendered. A victim running a vulnerable Chrome build (prior to 156.0.8078.47) visits the page, and the memory corruption is leveraged to execute arbitrary code outside the browser sandbox. No public exploit code was identified in the provided intelligence, so real-world weaponization difficulty is unknown. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026
Memory corruption in Google Chrome's PolicyContainer component affects desktop builds prior to 156.0.8078.47 and can allow a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the browser sandbox when a victim loads a crafted HTML page. Exploitation requires the target to actively visit attacker-controlled content (CVSS UI:R, PR:N), and while the vector scores 9.6 because the scope change pushes confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to High, Chromium's own 'Medium' severity rating and the description's 'potentially' indicate weaponization is non-trivial. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Google Chrome 156.0.8078.47 or later - the fix ships in the Stable Channel update documented at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html (Chromium issue https://issues.chromium.org/issues/531182364). End users should use Chrome menu > Help > About Chrome to force the update and relaunch; enterprises should push the corresponding MSI/PKG packages through their software deployment tooling and verify the reported version, and can enforce timely updates via Chrome Browser Cloud Management auto-update policies. Because this is a memory-safety bug in default code with no documented feature toggle, there is no clean configuration workaround; the practical compensating controls are to block or quarantine browsing by out-of-date Chrome builds (version-aware conditional access or a proxy that rejects user agents below 156.0.8078.47), and to route high-risk or untrusted web content through remote browser isolation so a crafted page renders away from the endpoint - both carry the trade-off of added latency, breakage of some sites, and ongoing maintenance overhead, and neither substitutes for patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Chromium's PolicyContainer is the document-scoped structure that carries security-relevant policy state (such as Content Security Policy and referrer policy) and is partly maintained in the privileged browser process, with that state serialized and passed across the renderer-to-browser IPC boundary. CWE-119 (improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer) in this code path means an out-of-bounds read or write on PolicyContainer data, which is why the resulting impact is classified with S:C rather than a contained renderer compromise: corruption of a structure consumed by the browser process can yield code execution at browser privilege, i.e., outside the renderer sandbox. The entry point is ordinary web content - a crafted HTML page that drives the vulnerable PolicyContainer handling - and no non-default Chrome setting or feature flag is named, so the default rendering path is exposed once the victim is lured to the page.
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Crafted HTML is network-delivered (AV:N) and requires the victim to open a page (UI:R); no auth (PR:N); escaping the sandbox to the host is a scope change (S:C) with full code execution (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Memory corruption in PolicyContainer in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome desktop deployments below version 156.0.8078.47 carry a critical memory-corruption flaw in the PolicyContainer component that can let attacker-supplied web content break out of the browser sandbox and run code with the user's privileges. Any employee who browses the open web on an unpatched Chrome build is a potential entry point, making this a workstation-level risk that could serve as a foothold for broader intrusion. Leadership should care because the affected population is essentially the entire workforce and the fix is a routine browser update.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-105597
GHSA-mxph-hpxw-xqrc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB