Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to crafted HTML page
-
DeliveryTrigger memory corruption in PerformanceAPIs
-
ExploitCorrupt renderer heap state
-
ExecutionEscape Chrome renderer sandbox
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a victim running Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 to load attacker-controlled web content - specifically a crafted HTML page that exercises the PerformanceAPIs (the W3C Performance timing/measurement JavaScript interfaces) to trigger the CWE-119 memory corruption (UI:R, so the user must visit or be redirected to the page). No authentication or special privileges are needed (PR:N). Key limiting factors: the attack needs user interaction (navigation to the malicious page), affects only unpatched Chrome builds, and the claimed sandbox escape is qualified as 'potentially' and rated only 'Low' by Chromium, indicating reliable arbitrary code execution outside the sandbox may not be practically achievable; no non-default configuration is required. |
| Impact | The signals here conflict sharply and must be reconciled before prioritization. The input CVSS base score of 9.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated memory-corruption flaw that escapes the Chrome sandbox (S:C) with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - on paper a critical, high-priority issue. However, Google/Chromium's own assigned security severity is 'Low', and the description hedges with 'potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox.' This is a significant and explicit discrepancy: a genuine, reliable renderer-to-host sandbox escape is normally rated Critical/High by Chromium, so the 'Low' rating strongly implies the memory corruption is hard to reliably weaponize into a working sandbox escape (e.g., limited control over the corruption, mitigations in place, or impact confined in practice) - verify with the vendor advisory. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC indicator are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or public exploit code; exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Net assessment: despite the headline 9.6, the vendor's 'Low' severity, the 'potentially' qualifier, the required user interaction (UI:R), and the absence of KEV/EPSS/POC signals suggest this is a lower real-world priority than the CVSS number alone implies - a browser flaw to patch on the normal Chrome auto-update cadence rather than an emergency. Because Chrome is ubiquitous, patch rollout breadth still matters even if per-instance exploitation risk is modest. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing crafted content that triggers the PerformanceAPIs memory-corruption bug when a victim using a vulnerable Chrome build (prior to 156.0.8078.47) visits it. Successful exploitation could corrupt renderer memory and potentially chain to code execution outside the browser sandbox on the victim's host, though the vendor's 'Low' severity rating and 'potentially' wording suggest reliable sandbox escape is uncertain. No public exploit code is identified in the available data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026
Memory corruption in Google Chrome's PerformanceAPIs (all builds prior to 156.0.8078.47) allows remote attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox when a victim loads a crafted HTML page. The CVSS 3.1 vector scores 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H), but the signals conflict sharply: Google rates the Chromium severity as Low and qualifies the sandbox escape only as 'potentially' achievable, so reliable code execution beyond the browser sandbox may not be practical. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch (156.0.8078.47) is available.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade Google Chrome to 156.0.8078.47 or later and restart the browser so the new binary is loaded; verify the installed version via chrome://version. Enterprise administrators should force the update through their management console or Chrome policies (e.g., UpdateDefault/autoupdate) and confirm fleet compliance, since the fix ships through the standard stable channel described at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html. No practical way exists to disable the Performance APIs without breaking legitimate web applications, so compensating controls are limited: restrict high-risk users to trusted sites, enable Safe Browsing and site isolation, and consider remote browser isolation for users who routinely browse untrusted content - each adds latency or breaks sites that depend on Performance API timing. Because no public exploit was identified, the practical urgency is lower than the 9.6 base score suggests, but the update should still be applied promptly given the claimed sandbox-escape impact.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-119 improper-restriction-of-operations-within-a-memory-buffer error in Chrome's implementation of the W3C Performance APIs - the JavaScript timing and measurement interfaces (performance.now, PerformanceObserver, User Timing, Resource Timing) exposed to web content. Because these APIs are reachable from any rendered page, a crafted HTML document can drive the memory-corruption primitive without authentication (PR:N); exploitation requires the victim to navigate to or be redirected to attacker-controlled content (UI:R). The CVSS vector's scope change (S:C) reflects the claim that a compromised renderer could affect resources beyond its security scope, i.e., escape the sandbox - the reason for the high C/I/A impact ratings despite Chromium's own 'Low' severity rating. That rating mismatch is the central analytic tension: the base score assumes a full sandbox escape, while the vendor's assessment indicates the escape is only 'potentially' achievable and not demonstrated to be reliable.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remote crafted page with no auth (AV:N/PR:N) but requires the victim to visit it (UI:R); a successful sandbox escape changes scope (S:C) with full host impact; AC:L retained per input though vendor 'Low' rating hints real complexity may be higher.
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Memory corruption in PerformanceAPIs in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome installations below version 156.0.8078.47 carry a critical-rated memory-corruption flaw in PerformanceAPIs that could allow a crafted web page to undermine the browser sandbox and potentially execute code on the endpoint. The exposure is broad because Chrome is widely used across the workforce, but Google's lower internal severity rating, the uncertain nature of the sandbox escape, and the fact that no public exploit identified at time of analysis temper the immediate likelihood. Leadership should still prioritize rapid fleet remediation because a sandbox escape on employee endpoints could bypass layered defenses and increase incident scope if exploitation becomes practical.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
EUVD-2026-105694
GHSA-7x57-4h3r-prrg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB