Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious Chrome extension
-
ExploitSocially engineer victim into installing
-
ExecutionInject code to spoof UI elements
-
ImpactDeceive user via fake interface
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to install a specifically crafted malicious Chrome extension, delivered through social engineering - this is not exploitable against a default, clean Chrome install without that user action. The limiting factors are therefore substantial: mandatory user interaction (UI:R), the need to convince the user to add an untrusted extension (bypassing Chrome Web Store vetting or using sideloading/developer mode), and a client version prior to 155.0.8059.39. There is no server-side or drive-by path; the attack surface is confined to the extensions subsystem and depends on the user actively adding attacker-controlled code. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely LOW-to-MODERATE real-world priority despite Chrome's ubiquity. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L, base 5.4, vendor-rated Medium) describes a network-reachable but user-interaction-dependent issue with only Low confidentiality and Low availability impact and NO integrity impact (I:N) - inconsistent with the 'RCE' tag applied in the input, which overstates the flaw (this is UI spoofing, not arbitrary code execution on the host). Exploitation requires the victim to be socially engineered into installing a crafted malicious extension, which is a significant practical barrier. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The signals are internally consistent (low severity, high interaction requirement, no exploitation evidence) and point to a low-urgency patch-on-normal-cycle item rather than an emergency, notwithstanding the enormous install base of Chrome. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker publishes or distributes a crafted Chrome extension and uses social engineering (phishing, fake tooling, deceptive listing) to convince a user to install it. Once installed, the extension abuses the code-injection weakness to spoof browser UI elements, potentially tricking the victim into trusting fraudulent prompts or disclosing information. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the attack cannot proceed without the user installing the extension (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026
Code injection in the Extensions subsystem of Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 lets a remote attacker spoof browser UI elements once a victim has been socially engineered into installing a crafted extension. Exploitation is gated behind mandatory user interaction (UI:R) and the deliberate addition of attacker-controlled extension code, so exposure is limited to users who sideload or approve an untrusted extension rather than to any default, clean Chrome install; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Google has shipped a fix in the Chrome 155.0.8059.39 stable channel release, and the issue is rated Medium at 5.4 with only low confidentiality and low availability impact.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Chrome 155.0.8059.39 or later, distributed through the standard stable channel update described in the Chrome Releases blog (https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html, mirrored at http://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html). Verify the installed build via chrome://version and, in managed fleets, force the update through Chrome Browser Cloud Management or the relevant platform policy so endpoints do not wait on the lazy auto-update cadence. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, the highest-value compensating control is tightening the install surface: enforce ExtensionSettings or ExtensionInstallBlocklist/ExtensionInstallAllowlist so only vetted extensions can be added (trade-off: blocks legitimate unvetted or internal-only extensions until they are added to the allowlist), and disable sideloading and developer mode via ExtensionInstallSources and DeveloperToolsAvailability (trade-off: breaks internal extension development and debugging workflows). Re-educating users against approving extension install prompts or permissions requests from unsolicited sources directly addresses the social-engineering delivery vector, since the attacker cannot reach a clean browser without that consent; note that none of these controls remove the underlying code-injection flaw, so the 155.0.8059.39 upgrade remains the only complete fix. Advisory cross-references: NVD https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-106416, Chromium tracker https://issues.chromium.org/issues/514072462.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw lives in Chrome's extensions subsystem, which is a privileged, permission-scoped runtime: installed extensions ship a manifest that declares host permissions and can register content scripts, service workers, and chrome.* API access, with some extension surfaces able to render over browser chrome and modify what the user sees (CWE-94, code injection). The root-cause class indicates attacker-supplied input reaching a code-execution sink inside that extension context, allowing spoofed UI elements rather than a memory-corruption exploit or a sandbox escape. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* reflects that the entire pre-fix version range across Chrome's supported desktop platforms is treated as affected. Because delivery depends on the user actively installing a specifically crafted extension - bypassing Chrome Web Store vetting through sideloading/developer mode or deceptive install prompts - the real attack surface is the extension supply chain and user trust model, not a drive-by or server-side path. The assessed vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L) matches that threat model: unauthenticated in the network sense but fully dependent on victim interaction, with bounded impact confined to the user's own browsing session. Tracking references are Chromium issue 514072462, EUVD-2026-93714, and NVD entry CVE-2026-106416.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
User must install a crafted extension so UI:R; no auth needed for delivery so PR:N; impact is UI spoofing with limited confidentiality/availability and no integrity, so C:L/I:N/A:L.
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Code injection in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
EUVD-2026-93714
GHSA-29r8-vmwj-r6fh
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB