Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to crafted HTML page
-
ExploitTrigger improper DevTools state validation
-
ExecutionCorrupt execution state
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code within sandbox
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Unusual condition handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to load attacker-controlled content (crafted HTML page) in Chrome versions prior to 155.0.8059.39, triggering the vulnerable DevTools state-validation path (UI:R). No authentication is required (PR:N) and the attack is network-delivered (AV:N). Critical limiting factors: (1) mandatory user interaction (visiting/opening the malicious page), which prevents automated or wormable exploitation and is why SSVC marks Automatable=no; (2) resulting code execution is confined to the renderer sandbox (S:U), so full host compromise would require an additional sandbox-escape primitive not described here; (3) only unpatched Chrome builds below 155.0.8059.39 are affected, and auto-update rapidly reduces the exposed population. |
| Impact | Signals are moderately consistent and point to a serious-but-not-emergency browser flaw. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated issue that requires user interaction (visiting a crafted HTML page). CISA's SSVC framing aligns and tempers urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (user interaction breaks mass/automated exploitation), Technical Impact=total. The CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No EPSS score was provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. One important nuance the raw 8.8 obscures: the description states code executes 'inside the sandbox,' i.e. this is sandboxed code execution via DevTools state confusion, not a confirmed full sandbox escape - absent a chained renderer/sandbox-escape bug, real-world impact is contained to the compromised renderer process. Net: a legitimate High-severity patch-now item for a ubiquitous product, but not a drop-everything 0-day given no exploitation evidence, required user interaction, and sandbox containment. Verify whether any companion sandbox-escape CVE shipped in the same Chrome 155.0.8059.39 release before downgrading priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing crafted content that abuses an improper state-validation flaw in Chrome's DevTools, then lures a victim into visiting it. When the page loads and the vulnerable DevTools code path is triggered, the attacker achieves arbitrary code execution within the renderer sandbox. No public exploit code is referenced, and the attack depends on the victim opening the malicious page (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Arbitrary code execution confined to the renderer sandbox in Google Chrome builds prior to 155.0.8059.39, reachable when a user opens a crafted HTML page that drives the DevTools state-validation path into an inconsistent state. The flaw is network-delivered and requires no authentication (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N), but exploitation is gated by mandatory user interaction (UI:R), which is why CISA's SSVC decision framework rates it as not automatable. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis; Google rates the Chromium severity as High and has shipped a fixed build, so the practical exposure is limited to unpatched clients that have not yet received the auto-update.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Google Chrome to 155.0.8059.39 or later; this is a vendor-released patch and the primary and sufficient fix, since the vulnerable code path is corrected rather than merely gated. Practically, enable and verify Chrome's auto-update mechanism, then confirm the running build via chrome://version on managed endpoints, and use enterprise policy or your software-deployment tooling to force the update on fleets that pin versions, because the exposed population is defined solely by builds below 155.0.8059.39. Full details and the fixed-build listing are in the Chrome stable channel advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html, with the technical ticket at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/566404364. Where patching cannot be completed immediately, note that the attack requires the user to load attacker-controlled HTML, so blocking untrusted/suspicious pages via web filtering or aggressive anti-phishing controls reduces, but does not eliminate, exposure, and disabling DevTools outright via the DeveloperToolsAvailability enterprise policy removes this particular state-validation surface at the cost of breaking developer workflows and front-end debugging for the affected user base. Because exploitation is confined to the renderer sandbox (S:U), the Chrome sandbox and OS-level exploit mitigations remain effective compensating controls against full host compromise in the interim, though they do not prevent the initial code execution inside the sandbox.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-754 (Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions): Chrome's DevTools component fails to validate an expected internal state before acting on it, so an attacker-influenced page can push the DevTools code path into a state the implementation never anticipated, resulting in memory-safety-relevant behavior that the vendor characterizes as potential arbitrary code execution. The affected component is DevTools rather than the page renderer or the network stack, but the exploitation surface is still a crafted HTML page served over the network (AV:N) that the victim must load (UI:R), which fits the assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H vector with no privileges required. Because the CVSS scope is Unchanged, the resulting code execution is bounded by the Chrome renderer sandbox; achieving host compromise would require an additional, separate sandbox-escape primitive that is not part of this CVE. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and the EUVD record (EUVD-2026-93841) both scope the issue to Chrome releases below 155.0.8059.39.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Crafted web page is network-delivered with no privileges (AV:N/PR:N) but requires the victim to visit it (UI:R); sandboxed code execution keeps scope unchanged (S:U) yet yields full renderer compromise (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Improper state validation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome builds prior to 155.0.8059.39 contain a high-severity code-execution flaw confined to the browser's renderer sandbox, affecting unpatched endpoints across the workforce when a user opens a crafted webpage. Although the issue is network-delivered and unauthenticated, exploitation requires user interaction, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so leadership should focus on ensuring all Chrome clients receive the vendor patch to reduce avoidable exposure.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
EUVD-2026-93841
GHSA-m8p2-8mpp-wqqr
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB