Skip to main content

FortiSandbox CVE-2026-106170

| EUVDEUVD-2026-98969 MEDIUM
Uncaught Exception (CWE-248)
2026-10-13 fortinet GHSA-x4f3-h3vj-mqpr
4.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: fortinet
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with privileged FortiSandbox credentials
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted HTTP request triggering uncaught exception
  3. Impact
    Persistent denial of GUI and CLI access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Exception handling completeness
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold HIGH privileges on the FortiSandbox appliance (PR:H) - a valid privileged/administrative account on the management interface - and to send a specially crafted HTTP request to that interface. No end-user interaction is needed (UI:N) and the request is reachable over the network (AV:N). The key limiting factors are the mandatory privileged authentication, which confines realistic abuse to insiders or post-compromise credential misuse, and the impact being limited to availability (persistent loss of GUI and CLI management access) with no data exposure or modification. Affected deployments are FortiSandbox 5.2.0-5.2.1, 5.0.0-5.0.6, and all 4.4 versions.

Impact

This is a genuine but modest-priority issue, not a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 4.9 Medium) tells a consistent story: the attack is network-reachable and low-complexity, but requires HIGH privileges (PR:H) - meaning the attacker must already be an authenticated administrative/privileged user of the FortiSandbox. The only impact is availability (A:H); there is no confidentiality or integrity loss (C:N/I:N). No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was supplied in the input, so there is no signal of active or probable exploitation. Because exploitation is gated behind existing privileged access, the real-world risk is largely an insider or post-compromise (privilege-abuse) scenario rather than opportunistic mass exploitation - the high privilege requirement is the dominant mitigating factor. One cross-source conflict worth flagging: the input Tags list 'Information Disclosure', which contradicts the CVSS impact metrics (C:N, A:H) and the description (persistent denial of GUI/CLI access). This is a denial-of-service/availability bug, not information disclosure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A privileged (authenticated) user of a FortiSandbox appliance - or an attacker who has already obtained privileged credentials - sends a crafted HTTP request to the management interface that triggers an uncaught exception (CWE-248). The resulting unhandled error persistently disables the administrative GUI and CLI, blocking legitimate operators from managing the device until manual recovery. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Persistent denial of management access in Fortinet FortiSandbox stems from an uncaught exception (CWE-248) triggered by crafted HTTP requests sent to the appliance's GUI/CLI management interface; FortiSandbox 5.2.0 through 5.2.1, 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, and all 4.4 versions are affected. Exploitation is not unauthenticated - the CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) shows a privileged account on the management interface is required, so realistic abuse is confined to insiders or misuse of already-compromised administrative credentials, and the resulting impact is limited to availability (persistent loss of GUI and CLI access) with no data exposure or modification. There is no confirmed active exploitation and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is a modest-priority availability concern rather than an emergency, with remediation guidance published in Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-176.

RemediationAI

The provided input does not include an exact fixed version, so vendor patch status is not independently confirmed here; consult Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-176 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-176) for the precise upgrade target for each branch and apply the listed firmware release - upgrading is the only definitive fix for an uncaught-exception defect of this kind. Until the upgrade is completed, the effective compensating control is exposure reduction on the management plane: the vulnerability requires a privileged authenticated account and a crafted HTTP request to the GUI/CLI, so restricting management access to a dedicated, isolated management VLAN and to a small set of trusted administrative source addresses (via management-access ACLs or an authenticating reverse proxy that drops malformed requests) removes most reachable attack surface, at the trade-off of losing convenient remote administration and requiring jump-host access. For internet-facing management interfaces, terminating or firewalling GUI/CLI access entirely is strongly advisable; note that this can break legitimate remote administration and automation. Because persistent denial requires a privileged account, also reduce standing administrative accounts to the minimum, enforce multifactor authentication, and rotate administrative credentials to limit insider or post-compromise abuse; be aware that credential hygiene does not mitigate a malicious insider. Finally, enable management-plane logging and alerting on repeated malformed or anomalous HTTP requests to the GUI/CLI so that an attempt is detected before it escalates, and understand that an appliance reboot or management-daemon restart only restores availability temporarily - an attacker who retains privileged access can re-trigger the condition. Reviewing the advisory for any vendor-documented workaround, such as temporarily disabling a specific management feature, is recommended where global access restrictions are not operationally feasible.

Affected VersionsENISA

FortiSandbox 5.0.0 ≤5.0.6
FortiSandbox 5.2.0 ≤5.2.1
FortiSandbox 4.4.0 ≤4.4.10

Affected Packages

euvd fortisandbox no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-248 (Uncaught Exception) is an error-handling weakness class in which an unexpected input drives the software past its exception-handling logic, causing abnormal termination rather than a graceful error response. Here the affected component is the FortiSandbox management plane - the web GUI and CLI services exposed on the appliance's management interface - and the trigger is a specially crafted HTTP request that the management service fails to handle. Because the failure is described as persistent, the management daemon likely does not self-recover cleanly after the exception, leaving GUI and CLI inaccessible until operator intervention (for example a service restart or appliance reboot), which is consistent with the A:H availability impact in the assessed vector. The affected firmware lines map to the broad CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, matching the Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-176 covering 5.2.0-5.2.1, 5.0.0-5.0.6, and all 4.4 releases. Note that the input tag set labels this finding 'Information Disclosure'; that label is not supported by the assessed CVSS vector or the vulnerability description, both of which indicate availability-only impact, so the tag should be treated as an artifact rather than an indication of confidentiality loss.

Know when Fortisandbox gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY 4.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 4.9 MEDIUM

Network-reachable management interface (AV:N) with no special complexity (AC:L) but requires an existing privileged account (PR:H); impact is availability-only (A:H), no C/I loss.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).

CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Oct 13, 2026 - 18:22 NVD
4.8 (MEDIUM) 4.9 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 17:37 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.9

DescriptionCVE.org

An Uncaught Exception vulnerability [CWE-248] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0 through 5.2.1, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4 all versions may allow a privileged attacker to deny access to the GUI and CLI persistently via crafted HTTP requests.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 81% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized Fortinet malware-analysis appliance, limited to larger enterprise deployments
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

29
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +24
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5
CVE-2026-39808 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth

CVE-2026-25089 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 09

Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attac

CVE-2026-39813 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve

CVE-2025-53949 HIGH
8.8 Dec 09

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege credentials to execute

CVE-2026-26084 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 08

Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS varia

CVE-2026-26083 CRITICAL
9.8 May 12

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows una

CVE-2025-52436 HIGH
8.8 Feb 10

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerabi

CVE-2024-31491 HIGH
8.8 May 14

A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandb

CVE-2024-21756 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2024-21755 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2021-26096 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenti

CVE-2021-26097 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy