Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as maintainer-role user
-
DeliveryTarget project with package protection rules
-
ExploitIssue metadata removal request
-
ExecutionAuthorization check fails to enforce higher-role requirement
-
ImpactProtected package registry metadata deleted
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated user holding maintainer-role permissions (PR:H) on a project or group that has GitLab package protection rules configured to restrict certain package registry metadata removal to higher roles (e.g., owner). The flaw only manifests 'under certain conditions' per the vendor, meaning package protection rules must be in active use and a maintainer must attempt the restricted metadata-removal action. Limiting factors: the attacker must already possess a trusted maintainer account (no anonymous or low-role access), the impact is confined to integrity of package registry metadata (no data disclosure or service disruption), and instances that do not use package protection rules are not exposed. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals that are present all agree on that. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 2.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) reflects a network-reachable but high-privilege flaw: exploitation requires an already-authenticated user holding maintainer-role permissions (PR:H), and the only impact is a low integrity hit (I:L) - removal of certain package registry metadata - with no confidentiality (C:N) or availability (A:N) consequence. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code in the provided intelligence, so there is no evidence of exploitation probability or active abuse; the status is best described as no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The underlying weakness is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), consistent with the description's 'improper authorization checks.' No signals conflict here - every available indicator points the same direction: a legitimately-trusted insider (maintainer) can bypass package protection rules that are supposed to reserve certain metadata actions for higher roles. Note that the provided 'Authentication Bypass' tag is imprecise - this is an authorization/privilege-boundary flaw within authenticated sessions, not an authentication bypass. Real-world priority is low: patch in the normal maintenance cycle rather than as an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An organization configures GitLab package protection rules so that only owners (or higher roles) may remove specific package registry metadata. A user who holds only maintainer-role permissions on the affected project or group leverages the broken authorization check to delete that protected metadata anyway, overriding the intended role restriction. No public proof-of-concept is identified, and exploitation requires the attacker to already possess a valid maintainer account. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
An authenticated user holding maintainer-role permissions on GitLab CE/EE can remove certain package registry metadata that package protection rules are supposed to reserve for higher-privileged roles, due to improper authorization checks in the package registry. The issue affects all versions from 17.6 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2, and manifests only on instances where package protection rules are actually configured; the assessed impact is integrity-only (CVSS 3.1 base score 2.7), with no confidentiality or availability loss, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Vendor-released patches are available in GitLab 19.2.8, 19.3.5, and 19.4.2.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the vendor-released patched versions: GitLab 19.2.8 (for the 19.2 line), 19.3.5 (for the 19.3 line), or 19.4.2 (for the 19.4 line), per the patch-release advisory at https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-2-released/ and tracking item https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/work_items/631531. Because the flaw requires an authenticated maintainer account, the most effective compensating control if immediate patching is not possible is to audit and, where feasible, downgrade maintainer-role membership on projects and groups that rely on package protection rules - accepting the operational cost that developers who legitimately need maintainer functions such as package publishing and registry administration will lose them until the upgrade is applied. Additionally, review package protection rule configurations to confirm they are still in force and check package registry metadata for unauthorized deletions that could have occurred while the bug was unpatched; instances that do not use package protection rules are not exposed and can be scheduled for a routine upgrade rather than an emergency one. No public exploit code has been identified, so this is a scheduled-maintenance priority rather than an emergency response.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a classic broken access control problem, classified as CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), inside the GitLab package registry. GitLab's package protection rules are an access-control layer that lets project owners declare which roles may perform destructive or metadata-altering operations against packages in a registry; the code path responsible for removing package registry metadata failed to enforce the role threshold defined by those rules, so a maintainer-level actor could perform an action the configuration reserved for owners or other higher roles. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N confirms this is a network-reachable, low-complexity, no-user-interaction flaw that requires high privileges (PR:H) and yields only limited integrity impact within the same security scope. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is a version-agnostic match, so the authoritative version boundaries come from the vendor description and the GitLab patch-release advisory rather than from CPE version ranges.
Know when Gitlab gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Requires an authenticated maintainer-role account so PR:H; attack is over the web API (AV:N) with no user interaction, and the only impact is limited metadata removal (I:L, C:N, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (GitLab).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitLab
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.6 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user with maintainer-role permissions to remove certain package registry metadata that package protection rules restrict to higher roles, due to improper authorization checks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in GitLab CE/EE Authorization and Access Control Flaws
View all 24An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 11.9. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.1 prior to 16.1.6, 16.2 prior to 16.2.9, 16.
When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab af
Unauthenticated arbitrary file read in GitLab CE/EE lets remote attackers retrieve files from the GitLab server via the
The SSH key upload feature (lib/gitlab_keys.rb) in gitlab-shell before 1.7.3, as used in GitLab 5.0 before 5.4.1 and 6.x
A vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 11.10 prior to 15.1.6, 15.2 to 15.2.4, 15.3 to 15.3.2 allows
Sensitive credential and configuration disclosure in GitLab Enterprise Edition allows an authenticated user with Duo Cha
The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4
Authenticated code execution on the GitLab server is possible in GitLab CE/EE 19.2 through 19.4.0, where an integer over
Authenticated users who can define or modify a CI/CD configuration can achieve remote code execution on GitLab CE/EE ser
Unauthenticated path traversal in the @zereight/mcp-gitlab Model Context Protocol server prior to version 2.1.27 allows
EUVD-2026-98209
GHSA-mqc6-5cm6-j5mh
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB