Skip to main content

Juniper Junos OS CVE-2026-102029

| EUVDEUVD-2026-101354 HIGH
NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-fw7m-qhrv-4q2p
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Hold configured MSDP peering or PIM adjacency
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted MSDP/PIM message hitting AS-path expansion policy
  3. Execution
    Trigger NULL pointer dereference in rpd
  4. Impact
    Crash routing daemon causing denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Null pointer safety, defensive checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The affected device must be running Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved with MSDP or PIM configured AND a routing policy that uses AS-path expansion - this is a non-default multicast configuration, not a stock setup. The attacker must either already be a configured MSDP peer of the target (an admin-established trust relationship) or be an adjacent PIM sender able to send PIM messages to the device. Although the CVSS vector is PR:N (unauthenticated), these positional and configuration prerequisites are the real limiting factors: devices without multicast/MSDP/PIM, or without AS-path-expansion policies, are not exploitable, and the attacker cannot reach the condition from an arbitrary internet position without the requisite peering/adjacency. Impact is limited to denial of service (routing daemon crash); there is no data exposure or code execution.

Impact

This is an availability-only denial-of-service flaw (CWE-476 NULL pointer dereference in rpd) rated CVSS 4.0 base 8.7 by Juniper, with the vector confirming network reach, low complexity, and no privileges or user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N), and impact limited entirely to availability (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H, with a minor subsequent-system availability effect SA:L reflecting that an rpd crash degrades routing for dependent systems). The headline score is driven purely by the VA:H availability hit - there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure and no code execution. Several key exploitation signals are MISSING from the input: no EPSS probability was provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Critically, the raw CVSS PR:N overstates real-world accessibility: the description requires the attacker to be an already-configured MSDP peer (a deliberate, admin-established trust relationship) or an adjacent PIM sender, AND the target must be running a non-default MSDP or PIM policy that uses AS-path expansion. These conditions sharply narrow the realistic attack surface to multicast-enabled deployments with a specific policy configuration and a semi-trusted network position, so this is a high-CVSS issue whose true priority is moderate-to-high only for operators running affected multicast configurations, and low for the majority of Junos deployments that do not. Verify your MSDP/PIM configuration against the Juniper advisory to determine applicability.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has been configured as an MSDP peer on an affected Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved device (or who is an adjacent PIM sender on a connected segment) sends a crafted MSDP or PIM message that is processed by a policy using AS-path expansion. The malformed input causes rpd to dereference a NULL pointer and crash, disrupting routing on the device until the daemon recovers. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires the specific multicast policy configuration to be present.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

A NULL pointer dereference in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved crashes the daemon and causes a denial of service when a routing policy that uses AS-path expansion is evaluated against MSDP or PIM data. Exploitation is constrained by non-default configuration: the device must have MSDP or PIM enabled together with an AS-path-expansion policy, and the attacker must either already be a configured MSDP peer or be an adjacent PIM sender able to inject PIM messages. Juniper rates the 4.0 base score at 8.7 with network reach, low complexity, and PR:N per the vector, but the real limiting factors are positional (established peering or adjacency) and configuration-specific rather than arbitrary-internet reachable; impact is availability only, with no data exposure, integrity loss, or code execution, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the fixed Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved release specified for your platform in Juniper advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187); the advisory is the authoritative source for exact patched version numbers and is required because the supplied CPE data does not identify a fix version. Patch availability is per vendor advisory. If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, remove or simplify the AS-path-expansion clause from the routing policies applied to MSDP or PIM paths - this directly avoids the dereference but costs the path-filtering or route-manipulation behavior the policy provided, so review policy intent before deleting it. Where MSDP is not operationally required, disable it entirely, which removes the peer-triggered attack path at the cost of multicast source discovery across domains. Additionally, restrict MSDP peering to the minimum set of trusted peers via authentication and peer filters and tighten PIM neighbor filtering so only expected adjacent senders can reach rpd; note that because the attacker must be a configured peer or an adjacent sender, this reduces but cannot fully eliminate risk for any peering relationship you still need. Monitor for rpd process restarts and routing churn as an indicator of exploitation attempts, and remember that the impact is a denial of service only - no data disclosure or code execution - so containment priority should reflect availability, not confidentiality, risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-476 NULL pointer dereference inside rpd, the Junos routing protocol daemon that hosts routing policy evaluation along with multicast protocols such as MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol) and PIM. MSDP peers exchange source-active messages, and PIM senders supply multicast protocol traffic; when a routing policy applied to those paths performs AS-path expansion, the daemon dereferences an attribute it expects to be present but that is absent or unset for the MSDP/PIM-derived route, triggering a crash. Juniper's CPE strings (cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved) both use wildcarded version ranges, so the authoritative version matrix sits in advisory JSA112187 rather than in the CPE data. The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) agrees with the vendor's 4.0 vector on reachability, complexity, and lack of required privileges or user interaction, but frames the entire impact as availability loss; the vendor's minor SA:L reflects that an rpd crash also degrades routing for systems dependent on the affected device. That an rpd process restart is required to restore service, briefly destabilizing routing convergence, is consistent with both vectors.

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable DoS triggerable by a configured peer/adjacent sender with no target privileges (PR:N) and no interaction; impact is availability-only (A:H), with confidentiality and integrity unaffected.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:49 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated configured MSDP peer or adjacent PIM sender to cause a denial of service via an MSDP or PIM policy that uses AS-path expansion.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A denial-of-service vulnerability in Juniper's Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved routing protocol daemon (rpd) can crash the routing process on affected devices, potentially degrading or interrupting network availability for organizations that depend on those platforms in their core, edge, or service-provider-facing infrastructure. Exposure is limited to devices running a non-default combination of MSDP or PIM together with an AS-path-expansion routing policy, and attackers must already hold an established MSDP peering or be an adjacent PIM sender, so most general-purpose enterprise deployments are unlikely to be reachable. Impact is confined to availability - there is no data exposure, integrity loss, or code execution - but no vendor patch is currently available and no public exploit code has been identified at this time, making configuration hygiene and monitoring the primary defenses until a fix ships.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations are configuration- and monitoring-based. Disable MSDP or PIM on devices where these protocols are not operationally required; where they are required, restrict accepted MSDP peers and PIM neighbors to explicitly trusted addresses using ACLs or firewall filters. Remove or restructure AS-path-expansion policies from any routing policy evaluated against MSDP or PIM data, since the daemon crash is triggered when such a policy is evaluated against that input. Monitor rpd for unexpected restarts or crashes and alert on them, and engage Juniper support to confirm whether vendor-supplied workarounds or a fixed release are available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise and carrier-grade Juniper routing platform
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A null pointer dereference occurs when a program attempts to access memory through a pointer that has been set to NULL (address 0x0).

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy