Skip to main content

Juniper Junos OS CVE-2026-101994

| EUVDEUVD-2026-101477 HIGH
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency (CWE-130)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-j27m-44x5-5m2c
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain ICCP peer position on inter-chassis link
  2. Delivery
    Impersonate configured MC-LAG peer
  3. Exploit
    Send malformed ICCP message with bad length
  4. Execution
    Trigger length mishandling in l2ald
  5. Impact
    Disclose heap memory or crash daemon (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Length parameter validation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that MC-LAG be configured and operational with ICCP (Inter-Chassis Control Protocol) between chassis, and that the attacker can control or impersonate a configured ICCP peer - meaning the attacker must already occupy or spoof a trusted position on the inter-chassis control link (AV:A, adjacent). This is not remotely exploitable from the internet against a default configuration: devices without MC-LAG/ICCP configured are not exposed. The principal limiting factors are the non-default MC-LAG deployment mode and the need for a trusted ICCP peer position; impact is limited to heap memory disclosure (C:L) and denial of service of the l2ald daemon (A:H), with no integrity impact.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H, base 7.1) describes an adjacent-network, low-complexity, unauthenticated attack with high availability impact and partial confidentiality (heap) disclosure. The 'unauthenticated' (PR:N) rating is technically accurate per the vector but materially softened by the exploitation prerequisite: the attacker must be able to control or impersonate a legitimately configured MC-LAG ICCP peer, which is an adjacent (AV:A) rather than remote-internet-facing position. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so by the precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Net assessment: a genuine but situational issue - high CVSS driven by A:H, but real-world exposure is gated by an uncommon privileged network position (ICCP peer on the inter-chassis control link) rather than broad remote reachability. Priority is elevated for operators running MC-LAG topologies and low for everyone else. No signals conflict; the main caveat is that PR:N overstates ease of access given the ICCP-peer prerequisite - the adjacency and peer-impersonation requirement is the true limiting factor.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on the inter-chassis control link who can impersonate or has compromised a configured MC-LAG ICCP peer sends a malformed ICCP message with an inconsistent length parameter to the target's l2ald daemon. The length mishandling causes the daemon to either leak adjacent process heap memory back to the attacker or crash, disrupting layer-2 MC-LAG operation. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Malformed ICCP messages sent to the l2ald daemon in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved can disclose process heap memory or crash the daemon, producing a denial-of-service condition. Only devices configured for MC-LAG with ICCP between chassis are exposed, and the attacker must already control or impersonate a configured ICCP peer, i.e. occupy or spoof a trusted position on the inter-chassis control link (CVSS 3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H, 7.1). Exploitation is not possible against a default configuration or from the general internet, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the fixed software releases identified in Juniper's advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187); the provided intelligence did not include an exact fix version, so consult that advisory for the release-specific remediation before scheduling upgrades. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure by treating the inter-chassis control link as a trust boundary: carry ICCP over a dedicated, point-to-point path that is not shared with user or untrusted networks, and apply ACLs or filtering so only the configured MC-LAG peer addresses can send ICCP traffic - understanding that this only mitigates an attacker who is not already positioned to spoof the peer, and adds operational complexity to MC-LAG changes. If MC-LAG is not actively required on the device, disabling MC-LAG (and therefore ICCP) removes the attack surface entirely, at the cost of losing multi-chassis link redundancy and its failover behavior. Note that a daemon-level crash produces a transient availability impact that should be monitored, and that any heap disclosure may require follow-up credential or configuration review. No vendor-released patch version was specified in the supplied data, and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-130 improper handling of length parameter inconsistency in the l2ald (Layer 2 address learning) daemon, which processes ICCP (Inter-Chassis Control Protocol) traffic used by MC-LAG (multi-chassis link aggregation) to synchronize state between peer chassis. When a length field in a received ICCP message is inconsistent with the actual message contents, the daemon's parsing logic mishandles the mismatch, allowing heap memory to be read out or the daemon process to be terminated. The affected components are Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved (CPE data lists both as wildcard-version entries, so the advisory at JSA112187 must be consulted for the precise affected and fixed release list). Per the assessed vector, the attack is adjacent-network (AV:A), low complexity (AC:L), and requires no privileges (PR:N), but is gated by two prerequisites that materially reduce exposure: MC-LAG/ICCP must be configured and operational, and the attacker must be able to control or impersonate a configured ICCP peer. Impact is bounded to partial confidentiality loss (heap disclosure) and high availability impact on the daemon; there is no integrity impact (S:U).

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

ICCP is an adjacent inter-chassis control-link protocol so AV:A; no daemon authentication defeats peer impersonation so PR:N; heap leak gives C:L and daemon crash gives A:H.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:30 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionCVE.org

An Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in the

l2ald

daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker who can control or impersonate a configured MC-LAG ICCP peer to disclose process heap memory or cause a denial of service via a malformed ICCP message.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved contain a high-severity flaw in the l2ald daemon that can crash the daemon or disclose process heap memory when malformed ICCP messages are processed on MC-LAG inter-chassis links. Only organizations running MC-LAG with ICCP between chassis are exposed, and an attacker must already control or impersonate a configured ICCP peer, so the risk is concentrated in core network and data center interconnect teams rather than general internet-facing services. Leadership should prioritize identifying affected MC-LAG fabrics and restricting inter-chassis control link access because a successful denial-of-service could disrupt high-availability network paths.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict inter-chassis control link access to authorized ICCP peers via ACLs or dedicated links, disable MC-LAG and ICCP on nonessential segments, enable l2ald logging and monitoring, and apply vendor workarounds when published.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 81% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Junos/Junos Evolved widely deployed in enterprise and carrier networks
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy