Skip to main content

Junos OS CVE-2026-101961

| EUVDEUVD-2026-101312 HIGH
NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-7pv9-8xc6-p3w9
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Establish or abuse eBGP peering with target
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted BGP update packet
  3. Execution
    Hit nexthop-ECMP matcher NULL deref in rpd
  4. Impact
    Routing daemon crashes, routing DoS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Null pointer safety, defensive checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Two concrete preconditions gate exploitation: (1) a nexthop-ecmp qualifier must be attached to a BGP import policy - a non-default routing-policy configuration that must be explicitly deployed; and (2) the attacker must be a configured eBGP peer of the target, i.e. an established external BGP neighbor relationship must already exist. Limiting factors: devices without the nexthop-ecmp import-policy configuration are not exploitable regardless of version, and the attacker cannot be an arbitrary unauthenticated Internet host - they must sit in an accepted BGP peering session. Only affected Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved versions listed in EUVD are vulnerable; upgrading to the fixed service releases removes the exposure. Impact is limited to routing-daemon availability (DoS); there is no confidentiality or integrity effect.

Impact

Multiple signals must be weighed carefully here. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L, 8.7 High) presents this as a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated availability attack. However, the PR:N/AT:N framing overstates real-world reachability: the description makes clear the attacker must be an already-configured eBGP peer (a trust/peering relationship, not an anonymous Internet attacker) AND the target must have a nexthop-ecmp qualifier attached to a BGP import policy - a non-default configuration. These two preconditions materially narrow the exploitable population and argue for an attack-requirement/complexity penalty the vendor vector omits. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, POC, or SSVC decision data was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Net assessment: this is a genuine availability threat to service-provider and enterprise edge routers running the specific ECMP matcher configuration - a crashed rpd disrupts routing - but it is not an indiscriminate, spray-and-pray issue. It is a priority for operators who both run affected Junos/Junos Evolved versions and use nexthop-ecmp import policies with external BGP peers; for everyone else the real-world risk is considerably lower than the 8.7 implies. Impact is availability-only (VC:N/VI:N), so there is no data exposure or code execution.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who controls or has compromised a device in an eBGP peering relationship with a vulnerable Junos/Junos OS Evolved router sends a specifically crafted BGP packet. Because the target has a nexthop-ecmp qualifier bound to a BGP import policy, processing the packet triggers a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) in the routing daemon (rpd), crashing it and causing a routing denial of service. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires the attacker to already be an accepted BGP neighbor.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

A specific BGP packet sent by an existing eBGP peer can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the routing-policy nexthop-ECMP matcher of Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, killing the routing daemon and causing a denial of service (CVSS 4.0 base 8.7; independent assessment scores it AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/A:H with no confidentiality or integrity impact). Exploitation is gated by two preconditions: the device must have a nexthop-ecmp qualifier attached to a BGP import policy - an explicitly deployed, non-default routing-policy configuration - and the sender must already be a configured eBGP peer, so an arbitrary unauthenticated Internet host cannot reach the flaw; the CVSS vectors carry PR:N, but reachability still requires an established BGP peering session. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and vendor fixes are available per Juniper advisory JSA112187.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to the fixed service release for the deployed train: Junos OS 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, or 26.2R1-S2; and for Junos OS Evolved 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, or 26.2R1-S2-EVO, as documented in the vendor advisory https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187 (mirrored as EUVD-2026-101312). If immediate upgrade is not possible, the most direct compensating control is to remove the nexthop-ecmp qualifier from any BGP import policy so the vulnerable matcher is never invoked - the trade-off is loss of ECMP-aware route-import selection, so plan an equivalent policy (for example an explicit next-hop or community match) before removing it. Because exploitation also requires an established eBGP session, tightening which peers are accepted (prefix/AS filters, MD5/TCP-AO where operationally viable, and limiting eBGP sessions to trusted neighbors) reduces exposure but does not eliminate it for legitimate peers; there is no configuration knob that fixes the underlying dereference, so patching remains the only complete remedy. No vendor-released patch is missing here - Juniper lists fixes for every affected train - and no public exploit code had surfaced at time of analysis, so prioritization should follow normal change-management windows for routing-daemon availability bugs rather than emergency response.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-476 NULL pointer dereference inside Junos' routing-policy engine, specifically the code path that evaluates the nexthop-ECMP qualifier against routes learned via BGP. In Junos, an import policy can match on nexthop-ecmp to select routes whose next hop resolves through an ECMP group; when such a qualifier is attached to a BGP import policy, a particular BGP UPDATE received from a peer leads the matcher to dereference a pointer that was never populated, crashing the routing daemon (rpd) and interrupting routing services. CPE data confirms both affected platforms: junos_os and junos_os_evolved, the latter being the Linux-based, FreeBSD-independent Junos variant that maintains its own release train and therefore its own fix versions. Because the defect is triggered during inbound route processing rather than in protocol parsing of the peering session itself, the impact is confined to availability of the routing control plane (VA:H in the CVSS 4.0 vector, with SA:L for subsequent-system impact); there is no memory corruption, information disclosure, or configuration integrity effect.

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Reachable over an eBGP session (AV:N, PR:N) but gated by a non-default nexthop-ecmp import policy, so AC:H; impact is rpd crash only, hence A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:19 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the routing-policy nexthop-ECMP matcher of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a configured eBGP peer to cause a routing-daemon denial of service via a specific BGP packet received while a nexthop-ecmp qualifier is attached to a BGP import policy.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved can lose their routing control plane when a crafted BGP update arrives from an already-established eBGP peer while a non-default nexthop-ECMP routing policy is configured, causing the routing daemon to crash and the device to stop forwarding traffic correctly. Only organizations that have deployed that specific routing-policy qualifier on BGP-speaking Juniper routers are exposed, and the sender must already be a trusted, configured peering partner rather than an arbitrary Internet host. Leadership should care because the practical outcome is an availability outage on network infrastructure, and the population at risk can be precisely enumerated from existing router configurations rather than assumed fleet-wide.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Juniper Junos widely deployed in enterprise and service-provider routing infrastructure
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A null pointer dereference occurs when a program attempts to access memory through a pointer that has been set to NULL (address 0x0).

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy