Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain admin access to appliance web UI
-
DeliveryReach management interface on adjacent network
-
ExploitInject code into Alert artifact detail field
-
ExecutionWeb interface evaluates payload as code
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary commands on appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an account with full administrative privileges to the Trellix Network Security web management interface (PR:H) and network reachability to that management interface on an adjacent/management network (AV:A), not anonymous internet access. The specific abused feature is the Alert artifact details view in the web UI, where attacker-influenced artifact content is injected and executed (CWE-94). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker must already be a trusted admin (so this is a post-authentication privilege/trust-boundary escape, not initial access), exploitation is constrained to whoever can reach the management plane, and no user interaction by a victim is required (UI:N). There is a description-versus-vector discrepancy ('locally authenticated' vs AV:A adjacent) that defenders should resolve against the vendor advisory before scoping exposure. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and point to a real-but-gated risk rather than an emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N → 7.1 High) requires adjacent-network access and high privileges (PR:H = an authenticated admin), which substantially limits the population of capable attackers; vulnerable-system impact is full C/I/A (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) with no scope change (SC/SI/SA:N). The E:P maturity flag indicates proof-of-concept code is known to exist, but the vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV and there is no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation, so POC availability should not be conflated with active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be cited. Note a tension worth verifying: the description says 'locally authenticated' while the CVSS vector encodes AV:A (adjacent), suggesting exploitation over a management/adjacent network rather than strictly physical-local - confirm the intended access path with the vendor advisory. Because PR:H means the attacker already holds administrative control of a security appliance, the practical risk is admin-to-underlying-OS code execution (defense-evasion / persistence on the security stack) rather than initial compromise. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained or compromised an administrator account on a Trellix Network Security appliance - for example via reused credentials or a malicious insider on the management network - navigates to an Alert's artifact detail view and injects crafted content into an artifact field that the web interface evaluates as code. When that view is processed, the payload executes on the appliance, giving the attacker arbitrary command execution on a core security device. Proof-of-concept material is indicated by the CVSS E:P flag, but no public weaponized exploit or active exploitation is confirmed. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 26, 2026
Authenticated code injection (CWE-94) in Trellix Network Security appliances (NX, EX, FX, AX, and CMS/Central Management) lets a logged-in administrator run arbitrary commands by abusing how the web UI renders Alert artifact details. The flaw requires existing high-privilege admin access on an adjacent network rather than remote anonymous access, so it functions primarily as a privilege/trust-boundary escape rather than a mass-exploitable internet-facing bug. The CVSS 4.0 maturity flag (E:P) indicates proof-of-concept exploit material exists, but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and shows no confirmed active exploitation.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix described in Trellix Knowledge Base article 000015433 (https://support.trellix.com/s/article/000015433) - patch available per vendor advisory, though an exact fixed version is not specified in the provided data, so confirm the target build for each appliance type (NX/EX/FX/AX/CMS) directly from that advisory. Because exploitation requires an authenticated admin on an adjacent network, the highest-value compensating controls until patching are: restrict the appliance management/web-UI interface to a dedicated management VLAN or jump-host so it is not reachable from general user or production segments (trade-off: tightened admin workflows, possible need for VPN/bastion access); enforce least-privilege and reduce the number of full-admin accounts, since PR:H is the key prerequisite (trade-off: operational overhead delegating roles); and enable strong authentication (MFA, unique strong credentials, audit logging) on all admin accounts and monitor the Alert artifact-detail views and admin command activity for anomalies (trade-off: more alerting noise to triage). Do not disable Alert artifact inspection wholesale, as that would undermine the appliance's detection mission.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Trellix Network Security (the former FireEye Network Security line) comprises the NX inline/threat-prevention sensors, EX email security, FX file/content analysis, AX malware analysis, and the CMS/Central Management orchestration appliance, all administered through a shared web console (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:trellix:trellix_network_security_nx,_ex,_fx,_ax,_and_cms). The root cause is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection): data within the Alert artifact detail view - fields populated from captured/analyzed network or file artifacts - is incorporated into a code or command context without sufficient neutralization, so attacker-influenced content in those artifact fields is interpreted as executable code by the appliance rather than as inert display data.
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Adjacent management-network access (AV:A) and existing full admin (PR:H) are required; once met it yields full code execution on the appliance, so C/I/A:H with no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (trellix).
CVSS VectorVendor: trellix
DescriptionCVE.org
A Code Injection vulnerability existed in Trellix Network Security CM and NX. A locally authenticated admin user can execute arbitrary code using the web interface and Alert artifact details.
Executive ViewAI
Trellix Network Security appliances (NX, EX, FX, AX, CMS) are vulnerable to authenticated code injection that allows logged-in administrators to execute arbitrary commands and bypass internal trust boundaries. While this requires existing admin credentials, it represents a critical insider-threat risk that could enable malicious administrators to compromise network security infrastructure without detection. Organizations running these appliances must immediately audit administrative access and restrict privileges pending a vendor patch.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict admin UI access to dedicated management network with strict network ACLs; (2) enforce multi-factor authentication for all admin accounts; (3) implement privileged access management (PAM) with session recording and approval workflows; (4) deploy intrusion detection rules monitoring for unexpected command execution on appliances; (5) audit and disable inactive admin accounts; (6) monitor system logs for anomalous alert artifact access patterns.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
EUVD-2025-210348
GHSA-9639-6pf9-jh9r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB