Skip to main content

Trellix Network Security CVE-2025-7958

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210348 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-06-26 trellix GHSA-9639-6pf9-jh9r
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: trellix
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain admin access to appliance web UI
  2. Delivery
    Reach management interface on adjacent network
  3. Exploit
    Inject code into Alert artifact detail field
  4. Execution
    Web interface evaluates payload as code
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands on appliance

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an account with full administrative privileges to the Trellix Network Security web management interface (PR:H) and network reachability to that management interface on an adjacent/management network (AV:A), not anonymous internet access. The specific abused feature is the Alert artifact details view in the web UI, where attacker-influenced artifact content is injected and executed (CWE-94). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker must already be a trusted admin (so this is a post-authentication privilege/trust-boundary escape, not initial access), exploitation is constrained to whoever can reach the management plane, and no user interaction by a victim is required (UI:N). There is a description-versus-vector discrepancy ('locally authenticated' vs AV:A adjacent) that defenders should resolve against the vendor advisory before scoping exposure.

Impact

Signals are mixed and point to a real-but-gated risk rather than an emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N → 7.1 High) requires adjacent-network access and high privileges (PR:H = an authenticated admin), which substantially limits the population of capable attackers; vulnerable-system impact is full C/I/A (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) with no scope change (SC/SI/SA:N). The E:P maturity flag indicates proof-of-concept code is known to exist, but the vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV and there is no evidence of in-the-wild exploitation, so POC availability should not be conflated with active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be cited. Note a tension worth verifying: the description says 'locally authenticated' while the CVSS vector encodes AV:A (adjacent), suggesting exploitation over a management/adjacent network rather than strictly physical-local - confirm the intended access path with the vendor advisory. Because PR:H means the attacker already holds administrative control of a security appliance, the practical risk is admin-to-underlying-OS code execution (defense-evasion / persistence on the security stack) rather than initial compromise.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained or compromised an administrator account on a Trellix Network Security appliance - for example via reused credentials or a malicious insider on the management network - navigates to an Alert's artifact detail view and injects crafted content into an artifact field that the web interface evaluates as code. When that view is processed, the payload executes on the appliance, giving the attacker arbitrary command execution on a core security device. Proof-of-concept material is indicated by the CVSS E:P flag, but no public weaponized exploit or active exploitation is confirmed.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 26, 2026

Authenticated code injection (CWE-94) in Trellix Network Security appliances (NX, EX, FX, AX, and CMS/Central Management) lets a logged-in administrator run arbitrary commands by abusing how the web UI renders Alert artifact details. The flaw requires existing high-privilege admin access on an adjacent network rather than remote anonymous access, so it functions primarily as a privilege/trust-boundary escape rather than a mass-exploitable internet-facing bug. The CVSS 4.0 maturity flag (E:P) indicates proof-of-concept exploit material exists, but the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and shows no confirmed active exploitation.

RemediationAI

Apply the fix described in Trellix Knowledge Base article 000015433 (https://support.trellix.com/s/article/000015433) - patch available per vendor advisory, though an exact fixed version is not specified in the provided data, so confirm the target build for each appliance type (NX/EX/FX/AX/CMS) directly from that advisory. Because exploitation requires an authenticated admin on an adjacent network, the highest-value compensating controls until patching are: restrict the appliance management/web-UI interface to a dedicated management VLAN or jump-host so it is not reachable from general user or production segments (trade-off: tightened admin workflows, possible need for VPN/bastion access); enforce least-privilege and reduce the number of full-admin accounts, since PR:H is the key prerequisite (trade-off: operational overhead delegating roles); and enable strong authentication (MFA, unique strong credentials, audit logging) on all admin accounts and monitor the Alert artifact-detail views and admin command activity for anomalies (trade-off: more alerting noise to triage). Do not disable Alert artifact inspection wholesale, as that would undermine the appliance's detection mission.

Affected VersionsENISA

Trellix Network Security NX, EX, FX, AX, and CMS 10.0.4

Affected Packages

euvd trellix_network_security_nx_ex_fx_ax_and_cms no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Trellix Network Security (the former FireEye Network Security line) comprises the NX inline/threat-prevention sensors, EX email security, FX file/content analysis, AX malware analysis, and the CMS/Central Management orchestration appliance, all administered through a shared web console (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:trellix:trellix_network_security_nx,_ex,_fx,_ax,_and_cms). The root cause is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection): data within the Alert artifact detail view - fields populated from captured/analyzed network or file artifacts - is incorporated into a code or command context without sufficient neutralization, so attacker-influenced content in those artifact fields is interpreted as executable code by the appliance rather than as inert display data.

Severity by source

Vendor (trellix) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 6.8 MEDIUM

Adjacent management-network access (AV:A) and existing full admin (PR:H) are required; once met it yields full code execution on the appliance, so C/I/A:H with no scope change.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (trellix).

CVSS VectorVendor: trellix

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A Code Injection vulnerability existed in Trellix Network Security CM and NX. A locally authenticated admin user can execute arbitrary code using the web interface and Alert artifact details.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Trellix Network Security appliances (NX, EX, FX, AX, CMS) are vulnerable to authenticated code injection that allows logged-in administrators to execute arbitrary commands and bypass internal trust boundaries. While this requires existing admin credentials, it represents a critical insider-threat risk that could enable malicious administrators to compromise network security infrastructure without detection. Organizations running these appliances must immediately audit administrative access and restrict privileges pending a vendor patch.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict admin UI access to dedicated management network with strict network ACLs; (2) enforce multi-factor authentication for all admin accounts; (3) implement privileged access management (PAM) with session recording and approval workflows; (4) deploy intrusion detection rules monitoring for unexpected command execution on appliances; (5) audit and disable inactive admin accounts; (6) monitor system logs for anomalous alert artifact access patterns.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise security appliances (ex-FireEye), common in larger orgs, not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy