Skip to main content

FortiClientMac CVE-2025-57741

HIGH
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732)
2025-10-14 psirt@fortinet.com
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: fortinet
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged access
  2. Delivery
    Locate world/group-writable FortiClient LaunchDaemon resource
  3. Exploit
    Overwrite daemon binary or plist payload
  4. Execution
    Trigger or await daemon (re)launch
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Permission assignment review
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have LOCAL, authenticated low-privileged access to a Mac running an affected FortiClientMac build (7.4.0-7.4.3, 7.2.0-7.2.11, or any 7.0 version) - there is no network vector. The specific prerequisite is an insecurely-permissioned FortiClient LaunchDaemon resource (CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment) that a non-root user can modify, enabling LaunchDaemon hijacking that runs as root on next service start. Limiting factors: no remote reachability, a prior foothold/valid local account is needed (PR:L), the host must run a vulnerable FortiClientMac version, and code executes only when the hijacked daemon is (re)launched - but no user interaction is required (UI:N).

Impact

This is a credible but non-urgent local privilege-escalation issue rather than a mass-exploitation priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) is internally consistent with the description: exploitation requires local access and existing low-level privileges (PR:L), after which a LaunchDaemon hijack yields full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - effectively escalation to root on macOS. The corroborating exploitation signals are weak: EPSS is only 0.13% (2nd percentile), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The low EPSS is fully consistent with a local-only, privilege-dependent flaw, which EPSS models rarely score high because they favor remotely reachable bugs. No signals conflict with each other. One labeling tension worth noting: the input Tags include 'RCE', but AV:L makes this LOCAL code execution / privilege escalation, not remote code execution - treat the RCE tag as misleading. Overall: patch in normal cycles, prioritize on multi-user or shared macOS endpoints, but this is not a drop-everything internet-facing emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local attacker who already has a standard (non-root) account or code execution on a macOS host running FortiClientMac abuses weak permissions on a FortiClient LaunchDaemon resource to plant or modify a daemon binary/plist. When the daemon next launches (at boot or service restart) it executes the attacker's payload with root privileges, escalating from a low-privileged user to full system control. No public exploit code is referenced, so this would require custom tooling, but the technique (LaunchDaemon hijacking via insecure permissions) is well understood.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Local privilege escalation in FortiClientMac on macOS allows an attacker with a low-privileged local account to hijack a LaunchDaemon and execute arbitrary code as root, due to incorrect permission assignment on a critical resource. Affected versions are 7.0 (all), 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.3. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low (0.13%, 2nd percentile), but exploitation requires only a local foothold and no user interaction.

RemediationAI

Apply the fix from FortiGuard advisory FG-IR-25-664 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-664); the advisory should list the exact patched version, which is not specified in the provided data. If a patch is not immediately available, administrators can manually audit and correct permissions on FortiClient LaunchDaemon files (e.g., /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.fortinet.*.plist and associated executables) so they are writable only by root, but this may need to be reapplied after FortiClient updates and could interfere with client functionality. Additionally, restrict local user accounts to only trusted personnel, as exploitation requires an existing low-privileged account.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

FortiClientMac is Fortinet's endpoint security client for macOS. The vulnerability arises from CWE-732 (Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource), specifically on a LaunchDaemon resource used by FortiClient. LaunchDaemons are system-level services that run as root at boot or on demand. Because the resource (likely a plist or executable) is insecurely permissioned, a non-root user can modify it, leading to LaunchDaemon hijacking: when the daemon starts, the attacker's code executes with root privileges. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:* identifies FortiClient for macOS as the affected product. This is a local privilege escalation (AV:L), requiring low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only LaunchDaemon hijack needing a low-privileged account gives AV:L/PR:L/AC:L/UI:N; execution as root yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).

CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

An Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability [CWE-732] in FortiClientMac 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0 all versions may allow a local attacker to run arbitrary code or commands via LaunchDaemon hijacking.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

FortiClientMac on macOS contains a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2025-57741) affecting versions 7.0 (all), 7.2.0-7.2.11, and 7.4.0-7.4.3. A low-privileged local attacker could exploit this to gain root access, potentially compromising the entire endpoint and enabling lateral movement. With no vendor patch available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, organizations should prioritize identifying affected systems and applying compensating controls.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting local user privileges, monitoring LaunchDaemon for unauthorized modifications, and ensuring EDR is configured to detect privilege escalation attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
macOS-only variant of widely-deployed Fortinet endpoint client; common but subset of installs
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*

More in macOS

View all
CVE-2025-34089 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 03

An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope

CVE-2026-86950 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 28

Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe

CVE-2026-20700 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 11

Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV

CVE-2022-48618 HIGH
7.0 Jan 09

The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)

CVE-2024-27822 HIGH POC
7.8 May 14

A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent

CVE-2023-22809 HIGH POC
7.8 Jan 18

In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen

CVE-2022-46689 HIGH POC
7.0 Dec 15

A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2022-32845 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 23

This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2021-44790 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 20

A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from

CVE-2025-52841 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i

CVE-2022-3970 HIGH POC
8.8 Nov 13

A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut

CVE-2022-0729 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 23

Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy