ZTE ZXCDN
CVE-2025-46581
CRITICAL
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach exposed ZXCDN interface over network
-
DeliverySend crafted Struts request
-
ExploitTrigger code injection (CWE-94)
-
ExecutionExecute OS commands as non-root service account
-
ImpactPivot/abuse CDN node
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to a ZTE ZXCDN instance exposing the vulnerable Apache Struts-based interface; per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) no authentication, no user interaction, and no special configuration are stated as prerequisites, so default-reachable deployments are exposed. The principal limiting factors are: (1) the attacker must be able to reach the affected service (ZXCDN nodes are typically deployed inside carrier/operator networks rather than the open internet, constraining the realistic attacker population), and (2) resulting command execution is confined to a NON-root service account per the description, limiting immediate privilege and requiring a further local privilege-escalation step for full host control. Exact vulnerable versions are not provided, so defenders cannot scope affected builds from this data alone. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) and 9.8 base score describe a remotely exploitable, unauthenticated, low-complexity code-execution flaw - the classic profile of a high-priority RCE, consistent with CWE-94 and the vendor's 'Struts remote code execution' characterization. However, the real-world exploitation signals are comparatively modest: EPSS is only 0.80% (55th percentile), the vulnerability is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One internal inconsistency to verify: the description states the attacker executes commands 'with non-root privileges,' which slightly tempers the Availability/Integrity impact implied by the vendor's C:H/I:H/A:H, since a non-root process is typically more constrained than the full-system compromise a 9.8 suggests - verify actual blast radius with ZTE. No SSVC decision data was provided. Net: for organizations running ZTE ZXCDN this is a genuine priority because the preconditions for exploitation are minimal (network, no auth), but the absence of KEV/POC and the low EPSS mean active mass exploitation is not currently evidenced; this is best treated as 'patch promptly' rather than 'emergency in-the-wild' at this time. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to an internet- or carrier-network-exposed ZTE ZXCDN management/service interface sends a crafted request that abuses the underlying Apache Struts processing to inject and execute operating-system commands without authentication. Code runs in the context of the service account (non-root), giving the attacker a foothold on the CDN node for further lateral movement or content manipulation. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects ZTE's ZXCDN content delivery network product through its Apache Struts-based interface, allowing a network-reachable attacker to run arbitrary commands under the service's non-root account (CVSS 3.1 base 9.8, PR:N/UI:N). Impact is bounded by two practical factors: ZXCDN nodes are typically deployed inside carrier or operator networks rather than on the open internet, and code execution lands with non-root privileges, so full host compromise would require a follow-on local privilege escalation. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and there is no CISA KEV entry, though EPSS sits at roughly 0.80% (55th percentile), reflecting moderate rather than elevated exploitation pressure.
RemediationAI
Patch availability is not confirmed from the provided data - no fix version is given, and the ZTE security bulletin (https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/3747693852734546826) should be consulted directly for the current fixed build and upgrade instructions; apply the ZTE-recommended release as soon as it is confirmed. Until a patched build is deployed, the highest-value compensating control is to block network access to the ZXCDN Struts-based interface from all untrusted sources - restrict it to a management VLAN or allow-list of operator jump hosts, since the assessed vector requires only network reachability (AV:N/PR:N) and any exposed instance is exploitable without credentials; the trade-off is loss of remote administrative access from general networks. Where the interface cannot be fully segmented, place a WAF or reverse proxy in front of it with OGNL/expression-injection signatures for Apache Struts and alert on anomalous parameter payloads, understanding that signature bypasses are common and this is a detection rather than a prevention control. Because execution is confined to the non-root service account, harden that account to least privilege, monitor for post-exploitation privilege-escalation activity (sudo abuse, SUID manipulation, credential file access) on ZXCDN hosts, and audit host logs for child processes spawned by the Struts/web service user. Confirm the exact affected and fixed ZXCDN builds with ZTE support, as version detail is absent from this advisory data and cannot be inferred.
Affected ProductsAI
ZTE ZXCDN deployments that expose the vulnerable Apache Struts-based interface. ZTE has not disclosed specific version numbers, build identifiers, or CPE strings in the available data, so affected builds cannot be scoped from this record alone; the authoritative scoping source is the ZTE security bulletin at https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/3747693852734546826 (reported by psirt@zte.com.cn). Because ZXCDN is a carrier-grade content delivery platform, affected instances are most likely operator-managed nodes within internal service networks rather than internet-facing public endpoints, though any deployment where the Struts interface is reachable should be treated as exposed.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-94, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), consistent with the known Apache Struts OGNL/expression-injection pattern in which attacker-controlled request parameters are evaluated as expressions by the framework and yield arbitrary command execution. ZTE has not published the underlying Struts version, the specific action or endpoint, or the exact ZXCDN builds affected, so the vulnerable component can only be characterized as the Struts-based interface exposed by ZXCDN deployments. CWE-94 maps cleanly to the assessed CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H: the injection is reachable over the network with no authentication, no user interaction, and no special preconditions beyond network reach of the affected service. The description's explicit statement that executed commands run with non-root privileges is the primary mitigation of impact scope, capping the immediate blast radius at the service account's file system, configuration, and process rights rather than root-level host control.
Know when Zte gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Unauthenticated network RCE with no user interaction gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; non-root command execution still permits high C/I/A within the service context, so impacts remain H.
Primary rating from Vendor (zte).
CVSS VectorVendor: zte
DescriptionCVE.org
ZTE's ZXCDN product is affected by a Struts remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker can remotely execute commands with non-root privileges.
Executive ViewAI
ZTE's ZXCDN content delivery platform carries a critical unauthenticated remote code execution flaw in its Apache Struts-based interface, allowing anyone who can reach that interface over the network to run commands as the service account. The exposure is concentrated in carrier and operator networks rather than the public internet, and because execution lands without root privileges, a full host takeover would require an additional local escalation step. Leadership should care because these nodes sit deep inside the delivery path for subscriber traffic, so a successful compromise could disrupt content delivery services and serve as a foothold for lateral movement within trusted network segments.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to the Apache Struts-based interface via firewall/ACL rules limited to trusted administrative hosts; segment ZXCDN nodes into isolated management VLANs with deny-by-default egress; deploy WAF/IPS virtual patching for Struts exploitation patterns; disable any unnecessary Struts endpoints or services; run the service under a least-privilege non-root account to limit post-exploitation escalation; and enable heightened logging and monitoring for anomalous process execution and outbound connections.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
web_shell_cmd.gch on ZTE F460 and F660 cable modems allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access via sendcmd
ZTE ZXHN H108N R1A devices before ZTE.bhs.ZXHNH108NR1A.k_PE have a hardcoded password of root for the root account, whic
ZTE ADSL ZXV10 W300 modems W300V2.1.0f_ER7_PE_O57 and W300V2.1.0h_ER7_PE_O57 allow user accounts to have multiple valid
ZTE ADSL ZXV10 W300 modems W300V2.1.0f_ER7_PE_O57 and W300V2.1.0h_ER7_PE_O57 allow remote authenticated users to obtain
ZTE ZXHN H108N R1A devices before ZTE.bhs.ZXHNH108NR1A.k_PE allow remote attackers to discover usernames and password ha
The TELNET service on the ZTE ZXV10 W300 router 2.1.0 has a hardcoded password ending with airocon for the admin account
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in cgi-bin/webproc on ZTE ZXHN H108N R1A devices before ZTE.bhs.ZXHNH108NR1A.k_PE
connoppp.cgi on ZTE ZXDSL 831CII devices does not require HTTP Basic Authentication, which allows remote attackers to mo
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in cgi-bin/webproc on ZTE ZXHN H108N R1A devices before ZTE.bhs.ZXHNH108NR1A.k_
ZTE ADSL ZXV10 W300 modems W300V2.1.0f_ER7_PE_O57 and W300V2.1.0h_ER7_PE_O57 allow remote authenticated non-administrato
WiMAX routers based on the MediaTek SDK (libmtk) that use a custom httpd plugin are vulnerable to an authentication bypa
All versions up to ZXINOS-RESV1.01.43 of the ZTE ZXIN10 product European region are impacted by improper access control
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB