Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify externally facing WSO2 login endpoint
-
DeliveryConfirm Multi-Attribute Login is active via response behavior
-
ExploitSubmit probe usernames from harvested email lists
-
ExecutionCompare canonical-resolution vs raw-echo responses
-
PersistBuild validated account list
-
ImpactLaunch targeted credential-stuffing or phishing campaign
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Timing-safe comparisons
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The Multi-Attribute Login feature must be explicitly enabled in the WSO2 deployment - this is the single required configuration prerequisite. The vulnerability persists regardless of how the validate_username setting is configured, meaning that control provides no mitigation. The login endpoint must be network-reachable by the attacker (AV:N), but no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N, UI:N). The AC:H rating reflects the deployment constraint: the attacker must identify a target where Multi-Attribute Login is active, but once a qualifying target is found, exploitation is deterministic and requires no special tooling or timing. Exploitation is limited to information disclosure - no direct account compromise occurs from this vulnerability alone. Deployments with Multi-Attribute Login disabled are not affected. |
| Impact | The NVD-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 3.7 (Low) reflects a narrow confidentiality impact (C:L) with no integrity or availability consequence, and AC:H acknowledges that the attack is constrained to deployments with Multi-Attribute Login enabled - a non-default feature. EPSS data was not provided, and no KEV or POC signals are present, indicating no confirmed or publicly demonstrated exploitation at time of analysis. The real-world risk is best understood as an enabler rather than a primary attack: alone, this vulnerability yields only username existence information, which is low-value. However, against WSO2 deployments in regulated sectors (banking, financial services, API gateway environments), validated usernames can meaningfully increase the precision and success rate of credential-stuffing, brute force, and spear-phishing campaigns. The AC:H rating partially reflects the deployment constraint but should not be interpreted as high technical complexity once a target environment is confirmed - the discrepancy is deterministic and automatable. Risk is moderate for organizations where Multi-Attribute Login is deployed in externally facing IAM portals, and low for those where it is disabled or the login interface is not internet-accessible. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An external attacker targeting an organization's WSO2 Identity Server portal - which has Multi-Attribute Login enabled for employee self-service - writes a script that submits login requests with a wordlist of email addresses. Requests for real employee accounts receive responses containing the canonical WSO2 username (e.g., the employee's internal username), while requests for non-existent addresses echo the raw submitted value. Within minutes, the attacker builds a validated list of active accounts and uses it to launch a targeted credential-stuffing campaign against the same portal using previously breached password datasets. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis, but the mechanism is straightforward to implement independently. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026
Username enumeration via observable login response discrepancy affects WSO2 Identity Server, WSO2 Identity Server as Key Manager, WSO2 API Manager, WSO2 Open Banking AM, and WSO2 Open Banking IAM when the Multi-Attribute Login feature is enabled. When a valid username is submitted, the server resolves and returns the canonical form of that username; when an invalid username is submitted, the server echoes the raw input unchanged - creating a deterministic, scriptable oracle for account existence. This disclosure path persists regardless of the validate_username configuration setting, meaning a common hardening measure provides no defense. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
RemediationAI
Consult the WSO2 security advisory WSO2-2025-4013 at https://security.docs.wso2.com/en/latest/security-announcements/security-advisories/2026/WSO2-2025-4013/ for the official patch and fixed version details, as no specific remediated release version was confirmed in available intelligence. As an immediate compensating control, if Multi-Attribute Login is not operationally required, disable the feature entirely in the WSO2 Identity Server configuration - this removes the vulnerable code path completely. For deployments where Multi-Attribute Login is required, restrict access to the login endpoint at the network perimeter (WAF or reverse proxy rule) to known IP ranges or authenticated networks, reducing the attacker's ability to probe accounts at scale; note that this does not eliminate the vulnerability, only constrains who can exploit it. Additionally, implement account lockout and rate-limiting on the login endpoint to increase the cost of systematic enumeration, and configure alerting on high volumes of failed login attempts from single sources.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 5 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-203 (Observable Discrepancy) describes vulnerabilities where a system's behavior leaks information through differences in response content, timing, or structure depending on internal state. Here, the WSO2 Multi-Attribute Login subsystem - which allows users to log in using alternate identifiers such as email or mobile number - must resolve the submitted attribute to a canonical internal username before authentication proceeds. For valid accounts, this resolution succeeds and the canonical username is surfaced in the response; for non-existent accounts, no resolution occurs and the raw input is returned verbatim. The affected CPEs span five WSO2 products: wso2_identity_server, wso2_identity_server_as_key_manager, wso2_api_manager, wso2_open_banking_am, and wso2_open_banking_iam, all under the cpe:2.3:a:wso2 namespace with wildcard version ranges, indicating broad version coverage across the product family. The validate_username configuration flag - presumably intended to control whether usernames are validated or masked - has no effect on this disclosure path, suggesting the discrepancy is introduced before that control is applied.
Know when Wso2 Api Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable login endpoint, no auth or interaction needed; AC:H reflects non-default Multi-Attribute Login prerequisite; only limited username disclosure, no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (WSO2).
CVSS VectorVendor: WSO2
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
When Multi-Attribute Login is enabled, the login interface fails to consistently mask the existence of user accounts. For valid users, the server resolves and displays their canonical username, while for non-existent users, it echoes the original input. This occurs regardless of the validate_username configuration.
The discovery of valid usernames can increase the risk of brute force attacks, social engineering attacks, and targeted information leakage. Attackers can leverage this information to craft more effective phishing campaigns or social engineering tactics to compromise user accounts or extract sensitive data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Wso2 Api Manager
View allAuthentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,
Server-side request forgery in WSO2 API Manager lets unauthenticated remote attackers coerce the gateway into making ser
Privilege escalation in WSO2 API Manager and related Carbon-based products allows a low-privileged user, using a validly
Authentication bypass in WSO2 Identity Server and multiple WSO2 platform products (API Manager, Open Banking AM/IAM/KM,
Missing role-based authorization on WSO2 API Manager's Gateway REST API lets any authenticated user invoke privileged Ga
Persistent denial of service in multiple WSO2 products - including WSO2 API Manager, WSO2 Universal Gateway, WSO2 Traffi
OS command injection (CWE-78) in WSO2's shared Carbon Console administrative interface allows an authenticated administr
Server-side request forgery in WSO2 API Manager and related WSO2 products lets a remote attacker direct the server to ar
Predictable HMAC shared secrets generated by the API Publisher component of WSO2 API Manager allow a sophisticated attac
HTTP response header injection in WSO2 API Manager and its companion WSO2 gateway components (Universal Gateway, Traffic
The XML parsers within multiple WSO2 products accept user-supplied XML data without properly configuring to prevent the
WSO2 Carbon OAuth, as shipped in WSO2 Identity Server, API Manager, and related WSO2 products, can leave session-bound t
EUVD-2025-210626
GHSA-g8w9-p6wx-8fxc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB