Skip to main content

Google Vertex AI CVE-2025-11915

MEDIUM
HTTP Request/Response Smuggling (CWE-444)
2025-10-22 f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c
6.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Vertex AI proxy endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted/ambiguous HTTP request
  3. Exploit
    Trigger proxy-backend connection desync
  4. Execution
    Smuggle request across connection boundary
  5. Persist
    Capture another user's backend response
  6. Impact
    Limited cross-user information disclosure

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service HTTP request consistency
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires sending crafted HTTP requests to Google Cloud Vertex AI generative-AI endpoints whose front-end proxy sits in front of an impacted model backend, triggering connection desynchronization (HTTP request smuggling) between proxy and backend; no authentication or user interaction is needed per the PR:N/UI:N vector. The decisive limiting factor is that this is a flaw in Google's managed proxy infrastructure, not customer-deployed software: it is only exploitable against the vulnerable Google-hosted proxy tier, and that tier was fully patched across all affected models by 2025-09-28, after which the condition is no longer reachable and customers need take no action.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a low-to-moderate, now-remediated risk. The vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a remotely reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw, but impact is capped at VC:L/VI:N/VA:L with subsequent-system impact SC:L/SA:L - i.e. limited confidentiality/availability effects from cross-connection desync rather than code execution or full data compromise, yielding a Medium 6.9. EPSS is low (0.32%, 24th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so there is no indication of active or imminent widespread exploitation. Most importantly, the Google Cloud bulletin states the fix was fully rolled out server-side across all proxies in front of impacted models by 2025-09-28 and that users need take no action - so for a managed-service consumer the present actionable risk is effectively nil. This is a genuine request-smuggling/information-disclosure class issue (CWE-444) but not a customer-actionable priority; it is a 'moderate-severity, already-fixed infrastructure bug' rather than a high-urgency threat. Note: only a CVSS 4.0 vector is provided (no 3.1), and the specific list of 'impacted models' is not enumerated in the supplied data.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends crafted HTTP requests to a Vertex AI generative-AI endpoint, exploiting connection desynchronization between the front-end HTTP proxy and the model backend to misalign request/response boundaries. As a result, the attacker's connection could be served another user's model response (or vice versa), leaking limited data across sessions. No public exploit has been identified, and the condition was remediated in Google's infrastructure as of 2025-09-28.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 18, 2026

HTTP request smuggling against Google Cloud Vertex AI generative-AI endpoints can cause connection desynchronization between the front-end proxy and the model backend, producing limited confidentiality and availability impact under the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L). The flaw is in Google's managed proxy infrastructure rather than customer-deployed software, so affected parties are users of impacted Vertex AI models served through the vulnerable proxy tier, and Google completed fixes for all such proxies by 2025-09-28. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, EPSS is 0.32%, and customers need take no action.

RemediationAI

No customer-side patch is required: Google reports that fixes were rolled out for all proxies in front of impacted models by 2025-09-28, and users do not need to take action; confirm details in the GCP security bulletin GCP-2025-059 at https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/security-bulletins#gcp-2025-059. For residual assurance, review Vertex AI request logs for malformed or duplicated HTTP requests and proxy-backend desynchronization symptoms, and restrict access to Vertex AI endpoints to trusted applications where feasible; these monitoring and access-control measures carry operational overhead and possible false positives, and they are compensating controls rather than a substitute for the completed Google-managed remediation.

Affected ProductsAI

Google Cloud Vertex AI generative-AI endpoints and models that were served through the impacted front-end proxy tier are affected, per Google security bulletin GCP-2025-059 at https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/security-bulletins#gcp-2025-059. No customer-deployed product version or CPE string is listed because the vulnerable component is Google-managed infrastructure. Google states that fixes were rolled out for all proxies in front of impacted models by 2025-09-28.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-444 describes inconsistent interpretation of HTTP request boundaries between intermediaries. Here, the front-end proxy and the model backend could desynchronize their view of a connection, enabling request-smuggling behavior that the supplied tags associate with information disclosure. The CVSS:4.0 vector and the independent CVSS:3.1 assessment both indicate network reachability with no privileges or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N), scope change, and only low confidentiality and availability impact (C:L/I:N/A:L). No CPE identifiers were provided because the vulnerable component is Google-managed proxy infrastructure, not a customer-installed package or appliance; exploitation is therefore tied to the Google-hosted proxy tier in front of impacted Vertex AI models, which was remediated by 2025-09-28.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c) PRIMARY 6.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:L/SI:N/SA:L/U:Clear
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity request smuggling (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) that crosses the proxy-backend trust boundary to another user, so S:C with limited confidentiality and availability and no integrity impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:L/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c).

CVSS VectorVendor: f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Connection desynchronization between an HTTP proxy and the model backend. The fixes were rolled out for all proxies in front of impacted models by 2025-09-28. Users do not need to take any action.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
single-vendor managed Google Cloud Vertex AI service, widely used but hosted
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

HTTP request smuggling exploits inconsistencies in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP message boundaries.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy