Hydra
CVE-2023-42449
HIGH
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Impact | CVSS score of 8.1 (HIGH). Attack characteristics: network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction not required. Public proof-of-concept exploit code is available. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | This vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network. Successful exploitation could compromise the high-severity affected system. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAI
Hydra is the two-layer scalability solution for Cardano. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.1), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available and no vendor patch available.
RemediationAI
No vendor patch is available at time of analysis. Monitor vendor advisories for updates. Apply vendor patches when available. Implement network segmentation and monitoring as interim mitigations.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This vulnerability is classified under CWE-20. Hydra is the two-layer scalability solution for Cardano. Prior to version 0.13.0, it is possible for a malicious head initializer to extract one or more PTs for the head they are initializing due to incorrect data validation logic in the head token minting policy which then results in an flawed check for burning the head ST in the initial validator. This is possible because it is not checked in HeadTokens.hs that the datums of the outputs at the initial validator are equal to the real head ID, and it is also not checked in the off-chain code. During the Initial state of the protocol, if the malicious initializer removes a PT from the Hydra scripts it becomes impossible for any other participant to reclaim any funds they have attempted to commit into the head, as to do so the Abort transaction must burn all the PTs for the head, but they cannot burn the PT which the attacker controls and so cannot satisfy this requirement. That means the initializer can lock the other participants committed funds forever or until they choose to return the PT (ransom). The malicious initializer can also use the PT to spoof that they have committed a particular TxO when progressing the head into the Open state. For example, they could say they committed a TxO residing at their address containing 100 ADA, but in fact this 100 ADA was not moved into the head, and thus in order for an other participant to perform the fanout they will be forced to pay the attacker the 100 ADA out of their own funds, as the fanout transaction must pay all the committed TxOs (even though the attacker did not really commit that TxO). They can do this by placing the PT in a UTxO with a well-formed Commit datum with whatever contents they like, then use this UTxO in the collectCom transaction. There may be other possible ways to abuse having control of a PT. Version 0.13.0 fixes this issue. Affected products include: Iohk Hydra. Version information: version 0.13.0.
Know when Hydra gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
Hydra is the two-layer scalability solution for Cardano. Prior to version 0.13.0, it is possible for a malicious head initializer to extract one or more PTs for the head they are initializing due to incorrect data validation logic in the head token minting policy which then results in an flawed check for burning the head ST in the initial validator. This is possible because it is not checked in HeadTokens.hs that the datums of the outputs at the initial validator are equal to the real head ID, and it is also not checked in the off-chain code.
During the Initial state of the protocol, if the malicious initializer removes a PT from the Hydra scripts it becomes impossible for any other participant to reclaim any funds they have attempted to commit into the head, as to do so the Abort transaction must burn all the PTs for the head, but they cannot burn the PT which the attacker controls and so cannot satisfy this requirement. That means the initializer can lock the other participants committed funds forever or until they choose to return the PT (ransom).
The malicious initializer can also use the PT to spoof that they have committed a particular TxO when progressing the head into the Open state. For example, they could say they committed a TxO residing at their address containing 100 ADA, but in fact this 100 ADA was not moved into the head, and thus in order for an other participant to perform the fanout they will be forced to pay the attacker the 100 ADA out of their own funds, as the fanout transaction must pay all the committed TxOs (even though the attacker did not really commit that TxO). They can do this by placing the PT in a UTxO with a well-formed Commit datum with whatever contents they like, then use this UTxO in the collectCom transaction. There may be other possible ways to abuse having control of a PT.
Version 0.13.0 fixes this issue.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
Hydra is the layer-two scalability solution for Cardano. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.1), this vulnerability is remot
Hydra through 0.1.8 has a NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash when processing POST requests that lack a Content-Le
ORY Hydra before v1.0.0-rc.3+oryOS.9 has Reflected XSS via the oauth2/fallbacks/error error_hint parameter. Rated medium
Code execution with the hosting application's privileges is possible in Hydra 1.3.4 through versions before 1.3.7 (and b
Pending deposits in Cardano Hydra heads can be stolen by any third party who can observe the chain and submit a standard
Hydra is the layer-two scalability solution for Cardano. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.1), this vulnerability is remotely
Configuration-controlled code execution in the hydra-optuna-sweeper package (Hydra 1.2.0 up to but not including 1.3.0,
Arbitrary code execution in Facebook Research Hydra prior to version 1.3.4 allows any party who can supply untrusted con
Hydra is a Continuous Integration service for Nix based projects. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is
Hydra is the layer-two scalability solution for Cardano. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotel
Hydra is a Continuous Integration service for Nix based projects. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability i
In Hydra (an OAuth2 Server and OpenID Certified™ OpenID Connect Provider written in Go), before version 1.4.0+oryOS.17,
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub
Exploit-DB