177
CVEs
32
Critical
78
High
7
KEV
10
PoC
88
Unpatched C/H
14.7%
Patch Rate
0.3%
Avg EPSS
Severity Breakdown
CRITICAL
32
HIGH
78
MEDIUM
67
LOW
0
Monthly CVE Trend
Affected Products (30)
Ios Xe
499
iOS
325
Adaptive Security Appliance Software
281
Nx Os
269
Firepower Threat Defense
225
Secure Firewall Management Center
180
Unified Communications Manager
173
Ios Xr
166
Identity Services Engine
149
Webex Meetings Server
133
Rv110W Firmware
132
Rv130W Firmware
131
Unified Computing System
102
Prime Infrastructure
80
Application Extension Platform
79
Rv215W Firmware
71
Wireless Lan Controller Software
68
Rv215W Wireless N Vpn Router Firmware
68
Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client
64
Web Security Appliance
64
Catalyst Sd Wan Manager
63
Rv130 Firmware
63
Webex Meetings
62
Rv130 Vpn Router Firmware
62
Unity Connection
57
Firepower Extensible Operating System
56
Webex Meetings Online
56
Data Center Network Manager
54
Open Redirect
51
Rv320 Firmware
51
Top Risky CVEs
| CVE | Summary | Severity | CVSS | EPSS | Priority | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-20182 | Remote unauthenticated attackers can bypass peering authentication in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller (vSmart) and SD-WAN Manager (vManage) to obtain administrative privileges and manipulate network configurations across the entire SD-WAN fabric. This critical authentication bypass (CVSS 10.0) allows direct NETCONF access as a high-privileged internal user without any credentials. Cisco released fixes in May 2026 following discovery of this second authentication flaw after a February 2026 disclosure of a related vulnerability. No active exploitation confirmed in CISA KEV at time of analysis, though the maximum CVSS score and authentication bypass nature make this a priority patching target for SD-WAN deployments. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 1.6% | 127 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-76461 | We need answer as JSON only. Need synthesize. Need be careful with fields. Let's analyze input. CVE-2026-76461. Description: vulnerability in email parsing of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Secure Email Gateway allows unauthenticated remote attacker execute arbitrary commands root. Due insufficient validation email parsing logic. Attacker send crafted email containing malicious SQL statements through affected device. Success execute arbitrary SQL, leading to command execution root. CVSS 9.8 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. CWE-89 SQL injection. KEV yes active. POC publicly available. SSVC: exploitation none? conflicting? Actually input says SSVC Exploitation: none, Automatable yes, Technical impact total. But KEV yes active. This is a dataset inconsistency. Need compare signals. Maybe SSVC from CISA? It says exploitation none but KEV yes. Need state conflict explicitly in risk/confidence. But exploitation status phrase must be "confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV)" because KEV=YES. Even though SSVC says none. Could note SSVC inconsistent in risk assessment / confidence. CPE: cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_email:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe shows all versions? Affected products from EUVD list many versions. Tags: SQLi, Cisco, Cisco Secure Email. References include Cisco advisory. Need use. Product name: "Cisco Secure Email Gateway" or "Cisco Secure Email"? product_name 1-3 words. The description says Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Could choose "Cisco Secure Email Gateway" (4 words? Cisco Secure Email Gateway: 4 tokens. But "Cisco Secure Email" is 3 words and CPE product name. Product field examples. Use "Cisco Secure Email" maybe okay. But "specific product or service name" affected: Cisco Secure Email Gateway. That's 4 words. "1-3 words ONLY" — choose "Cisco Secure Email" (3 words). Maybe "Cisco AsyncOS" 2 words. But CPE is cisco_secure_email. Input tags include "Cisco Secure Email". Use "Cisco Secure Email". Need fields plain text string | CRITICAL | 9.8 | 2.2% | 126 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20349 | Denial of service via crafted HTTP requests to the Remote Access SSL VPN service affects Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD Software across a broad range of versions, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to force an unexpected device reload and take down the firewall entirely. The Changed scope (S:C) in the CVSS vector reflects that the impact extends beyond the VPN process itself to the entire device, disrupting all traffic passing through it. This vulnerability is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV), with SSVC marking it as automatable, making it a high-priority remediation target for any organization with internet-exposed ASA or FTD VPN endpoints. | HIGH | 8.6 | 1.0% | 119 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20245 | Local privilege escalation in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (formerly SD-WAN vManage) allows an authenticated netadmin user to execute arbitrary commands as root by uploading a crafted file through the CLI. Cisco has observed limited real-world exploitation that resulted in unauthorized configuration changes being pushed to downstream edge devices, though the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. | HIGH | 7.8 | 0.1% | 114 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20230 | Server-side request forgery in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Unified CM Session Management Edition allows remote unauthenticated attackers to write files to the underlying operating system via crafted HTTP requests, which Cisco notes can be leveraged to escalate to root. Cisco has assigned this a Critical Security Impact Rating despite the 8.6 CVSS score because of the root-escalation pathway. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires the non-default WebDialer service to be enabled. | HIGH | 8.6 | 0.0% | 113 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20262 | Arbitrary file write via path traversal in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (formerly SD-WAN vManage) allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker to create or overwrite any file on the underlying operating system by sending crafted HTTP requests to affected API endpoints. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input during the file upload process (CWE-22), and a successful exploit can serve as a reliable stepping stone to root-level privilege escalation on the management host. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV; however, the integrity impact combined with root escalation potential elevates real-world risk above the CVSS 6.5 Medium baseline. | MEDIUM | 6.5 | 1.7% | 109 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20316 | Hardcoded static credentials in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to log in to the web interface using a built-in low-privileged account and access sensitive data. The flaw affects an extensive range of FMC versions from 7.0.0 through 10.0.1 and is rooted in CWE-259 (Use of Hard-coded Password). Cisco has self-elevated the Security Impact Rating to High - despite a CVSS 5.3 Medium score - explicitly because this credential foothold can be chained with other FMC vulnerabilities to escalate privileges, making the real-world risk materially higher than the base score implies. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been confirmed at time of analysis. | MEDIUM | 5.3 | 0.8% | 102 |
KEV
PoC
No patch
|
| CVE-2022-46292 | ### Summary A memory-safety vulnerability in Open Babel's MOPAC output parser allowed an out-of-bounds write into the `translationVectors[]` array when reading the "UNIT CELL TRANSLATION" block of a. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authentication required, low attack complexity. Public exploit code available. | HIGH | 7.8 | 0.8% | 60 |
PoC
|
| CVE-2026-20357 | Authentication bypass in Cisco Crosswork Planning (versions 7.0.0 through 7.2.0) lets remote unauthenticated attackers reach a critical function that lacks authentication (CWE-306), yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise (CVSS 10.0). The flaw was internally discovered by Cisco during a proactive security hardening review rather than external reporting, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because scope is changed (S:C), successful exploitation can extend impact beyond the vulnerable component to other resources it manages. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.5% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20358 | External control of file system paths (CWE-73) in Cisco Crosswork Planning versions 7.0.0 through 7.2.0 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to influence file names or paths used by the application, yielding high integrity and availability impact with a scope change (CVSS 10.0). The flaw was discovered internally by Cisco during a proactive hardening review and disclosed as part of a bundled software hardening advisory; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Because CVSS scope is Changed and privileges required is None, successful exploitation could affect components beyond the vulnerable module without authentication. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.4% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20317 | Authentication bypass in Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to compromise integrity and availability across a security scope boundary. The flaw, one of several found during a Cisco engineering-team internal security review and grouped under CWE-287 (improper authentication), carries a maximum CVSS 10.0 score driven by network reach, no privileges, and a changed scope (S:C). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the perfect CVSS and unauthenticated network vector make it a high-priority patch. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.3% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20315 | Authentication bypass in Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker circumvent access-control checks and fully compromise the platform, reflected in a maximal CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 with a scope change. The flaw is one of multiple improper access-control weaknesses (CWE-284) fixed in a Cisco internal software-hardening release spanning affected builds from the 1.x line through 4.0.x. It was discovered internally by Cisco engineering; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.3% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20223 | Authentication bypass in Cisco Secure Workload allows unauthenticated remote attackers to invoke internal REST API endpoints and act with Site Admin privileges across tenant boundaries. The flaw carries a maximum CVSS 10.0 score with a changed scope and full CIA impact, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Successful exploitation enables reading sensitive tenant data and modifying configuration globally, making this a critical-priority issue for any organization running affected versions. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.0% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20030 | SQL injection in Cisco Crosswork Planning (versions 7.0.0 through 7.2.0) lets a remote attacker inject arbitrary SQL commands, per Cisco's maximum CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). The flaw was found during an internal Cisco security-hardening review and addressed in a consolidated hardening release; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Cisco's vector indicates full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability with a scope change, meaning impact may extend beyond the database component itself. | CRITICAL | 10.0 | 0.4% | 50 |
No patch
|
| CVE-2026-20231 | Privilege escalation and cross-tenant compromise in Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) arises from improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-74 injection class), allowing a low-privileged authenticated user to inject crafted input that breaks the application security boundary. Because the CVSS scope is changed (S:C) with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, an attacker with limited access can affect components beyond their authorized scope. The issue was found internally by Cisco during a hardening review and is addressed in a consolidated software hardening release; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. | CRITICAL | 9.9 | 0.4% | 50 |
No patch
|