Code Injection
Monthly
Remote code execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API server (versions prior to 0.9.0) lets unauthenticated attackers run arbitrary commands as the container runtime user. The server passes request-supplied browser_config.extra_args directly into Chromium's launch arguments, enabling argument injection (CWE-88) of a malicious child-process launcher combined with --no-zygote. Because the Docker API is unauthenticated by default and CVSS is scored 10.0, a single crafted HTTP request achieves full container compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Privilege escalation in the Plesk web hosting control panel lets an authenticated low-privileged user abuse an improper authorization flaw in the XML API to inject arbitrary configuration directives, achieving arbitrary file write as root and full compromise of the underlying server. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope change, this turns any valid panel account into root on the host; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cypher injection in Apache Camel's camel-neo4j producer allows attackers who control JSON key names in the CamelNeo4jMatchProperties map to execute arbitrary Cypher queries against the connected Neo4j database, enabling unauthorized read, modification, or deletion of any node or relationship. The flaw exists across three release streams (4.10.0-4.14.7, 4.15.0-4.18.2, 4.19.0-4.20.x) and is a direct bypass of the partial fix introduced in CVE-2025-66169, which bound property values as query parameters but left property names (JSON keys) concatenated verbatim into the WHERE clause. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, though the prior related CVE in the same producer indicates recurring injection exposure in this component.
Stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the Simple Membership WordPress plugin before 4.7.5 lets unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary JavaScript in a logged-in administrator's browser by abusing the Stripe webhook handler. When no Stripe signing secret is configured, the plugin fails to verify webhook authenticity and then renders an attacker-controlled value unescaped inside an admin notice. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS remains low at 0.18% and no active exploitation is reported (not in CISA KEV).
Improper input validation (CWE-20) in the camel-aws2-sns component of Apache Camel stems from a missing inbound HeaderFilterStrategy rule on Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy, mirroring the flaw fixed in the sibling camel-aws2-sqs component (CVE-2026-46456). However, camel-aws2-sns is producer-only - Sns2Endpoint throws UnsupportedOperationException on createConsumer - so no externally-supplied SNS message attributes are ever mapped inbound into a Camel Exchange, leaving the missing filter rule unreachable by any attacker. Despite the NVD CVSS 9.8 rating, the vendor explicitly classifies this as a defense-in-depth alignment with no known exploit path, and EPSS scores it at just 0.16% (6th percentile); no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code execution in the NLTK Python library (nltk/nltk 3.9.3 and earlier) allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code when a victim loads a malicious JAR through five Stanford interface wrappers (StanfordPOSTagger, StanfordNERTagger, StanfordParser, StanfordDependencyParser, StanfordNeuralDependencyParser). These classes pass a user-controllable JAR path to an internal java() helper that calls subprocess.Popen() with no SHA256 integrity check, so a substituted or poisoned JAR executes with the user's privileges. This is a regression of CVE-2026-0848, whose SHA256 verification fix was applied only to StanfordSegmenter and never propagated to these five classes; no public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though a huntr bounty report exists.
Local privilege escalation via argument injection in TUBITAK BILGEM's pardus-software (the software-center application for the Turkish Pardus Linux distribution) affects all versions up to and including 1.0.4. A low-privileged local user can smuggle attacker-controlled argument delimiters into a command the application invokes with elevated privileges, yielding full compromise of the host (confidentiality, integrity, and availability all high) with no user interaction. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on CISA KEV; it is fixed in version 1.0.5.
Indirect prompt injection in the Kong Konnect Model Context Protocol (MCP) server (konghq mcp-konnect) before version 1.0.0 allows a remote attacker to smuggle malicious instructions into content that an LLM agent processes, causing the agent to issue unintended Kong Konnect API requests. Because the injected instructions execute with the trust and credentials of the connected agent, an attacker can exfiltrate sensitive Konnect data or drive management API calls the operator never intended. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 7.4 rating (scope-changed, confidentiality-high) reflects meaningful impact once an agent ingests attacker-controlled data.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Creative Themes' Blocksy Companion Pro WordPress plugin in all versions up to and including 2.1.46, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code (CWE-94) without any authentication or user interaction. Rated CVSS 10.0 with a scope-changed vector, this is a maximum-severity flaw reported by Patchstack. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the trivial exploitability of an unauthenticated RCE makes it a high-priority patching target.
Remote code execution in the Five Star Business Profile and Schema WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.3.19) allows an attacker holding an Editor-level or higher account to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the host. Reported by Patchstack and rated CVSS 9.1 due to its scope-changing impact, the flaw turns a trusted content role into full server compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CWE-94 code-injection root cause makes reliable exploitation straightforward for any authorized high-privilege user.
Authenticated remote code execution in Craft CMS 5.9.0 through 5.9.x allows control panel users with entry-editing permissions to inject unsandboxed Twig code via the HTTP Referer header during entry save operations. Because the signed redirect URL derived from the attacker-controlled Referer is compiled with renderObjectTemplate() instead of the sandboxed renderSandboxedObjectTemplate(), a low-privileged CMS operator can achieve server-side template injection leading to code execution. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the flaw is fixed in Craft CMS 5.10.0.
Remote code execution in the V8 JavaScript engine of Google Chrome before 150.0.7871.46 allows a remote attacker who lures a victim to a crafted HTML page to execute arbitrary code — though notably only within the renderer sandbox rather than achieving full host compromise. Rated CVSS 8.8 and stemming from a code-generation flaw (CWE-94) in V8, it affects all Chrome desktop installations on the vulnerable channel; a fix has shipped, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Log injection in Elastic Kibana (fixed in 7.17.15 and 8.11.1) allows an attacker with low-privilege access to embed unneutralized control characters in input that Kibana writes verbatim to its log files; when an operator later views those logs in a terminal that interprets ANSI/control sequences, the injected payload can forge, hide, or rewrite displayed log content. The issue is tracked as CWE-117 (Improper Output Neutralization for Logs) and carries a vendor CVSS of 8.0. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated remote code execution in JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras (firmware 4.8.30.57701411) lets a logged-in attacker plant a shell script in writable JFFS2 persistent storage and invoke it via popen() through the authenticated Anyka config HTTP endpoint, yielding reboot-surviving persistent RCE. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by VulnCheck), though there is no confirmed active exploitation in CISA KEV. The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.7 reflects high attack complexity offset by full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Deserialization of untrusted data in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux allows a low-privileged local attacker to achieve code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. Megatron Bridge is NVIDIA's model-interoperability tooling used to convert and load large-language-model checkpoints in the Megatron/PyTorch training stack, where unsafe object deserialization (CWE-94) lets attacker-controlled serialized data run arbitrary code in the process context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CVSS 7.8 (High) rating with full C/I/A impact makes it a meaningful risk on shared or multi-tenant ML infrastructure.
Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux stems from improper control of code generation (CWE-94), allowing an attacker who convinces a user to process a malicious artifact to run code in the context of the training/inference workload. Successful exploitation can escalate privileges, tamper with data, and disclose information. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R) indicates local access with user interaction is required.
Arbitrary JavaScript execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API server (versions before 0.8.7) lets remote attackers submit code to the /execute_js endpoint, which runs it inside the server's Chromium browser context launched with --disable-web-security. Because the browser's same-origin and CORS protections are disabled, attacker-controlled JavaScript can pivot into server-side request forgery against internal services and metadata endpoints. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.2 (critical), though the vector's high attack complexity and present attack requirements indicate exploitation is not fully trivial.
Remote code execution in txtai through 9.10.0 lets a remote attacker reach the API /reindex endpoint and supply an arbitrary dotted callable (for example subprocess.getoutput) that the server imports and invokes during reindexing, running commands as the server process. The flaw is exploitable only when the API is network-exposed with no TOKEN set (so all endpoints are unauthenticated) and the index is writable - not the default posture. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the issue carries a high CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and was reported by VulnCheck.
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary Python via the flow `tool_code` mechanism, gaining full control of the Langflow process. Because the scope changes (S:C), the attacker can read every process secret, read and tamper with all flows, conversations, messages, uploads and saved components in the database, reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, and pivot across tenants on the same instance. This is a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) flaw, though no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in IBM Db2 11.5.0-11.5.9 and 12.1.0-12.1.4 lets unauthenticated network attackers run arbitrary code by abusing improper handling of the pre-authentication DRDA handshake. Because the flaw is reachable before any login, any client able to reach the database listener can trigger it, and the CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-system commands and read sensitive files such as stored credentials, escalating from low-privileged application access to full host compromise. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope-changing vector, the flaw enables lateral movement once an attacker holds any valid Langflow account. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor patch is available.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Orkes Conductor (conductor-oss) versions 3.21.21 through 3.30.1 lets remote attackers run arbitrary OS commands by POSTing inline workflow definitions to the workflow API before any authentication check. The flaw stems from GraalVM script evaluators left in an unsandboxed state (HostAccess.ALL / allowAllAccess(true)), allowing JavaScript or Python expressions in INLINE, LAMBDA, DO_WHILE, and SWITCH tasks to reach Java reflection and subprocess APIs. Reported by VulnCheck; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a detailed vendor/researcher advisory exists.
Remote code execution in LLaMA-Factory through version 0.9.5 allows attackers who can reach the Gradio WebUI to run arbitrary Python by entering a malicious model path in the Chat or Training interfaces. Because the app forwards unvalidated user input into Hugging Face's AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained() and AutoModel.from_pretrained() with a hardcoded trust_remote_code=True, a referenced repository's custom modeling code executes with the server process's privileges. Publicly available exploit code exists (a proof-of-concept gist plus a VulnCheck advisory), though it is not listed in CISA KEV and no in-the-wild abuse is documented in the available data.
Arbitrary code execution in Snowflake CLI versions prior to 3.19 lets an attacker run code in the context of any developer who bundles or deploys an attacker-supplied Snowpark project. The flaw lives in the Snowpark annotation processor callback template, where untrusted project content is interpolated directly into generated Python code (CWE-94). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the attack is straightforward and high-impact (CVSS 8.8) given that it executes with the victim's local privileges; exploitation hinges on the victim running the bundling/deployment workflow against malicious content.
Remote code execution in Alexantr filemanager v1.0 lets remote attackers run arbitrary code through the filemanager.php component, mapped to CWE-94 (code injection). The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a network-reachable flaw requiring no authentication or user interaction, and publicly available exploit code exists (GitHub POC by SLO-CYBER-SEC). SSVC rates exploitation as proof-of-concept with total technical impact and automatable=yes, but it is not on CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided.
Local privilege escalation in FreeBSD's Linux binary compatibility layer (Linuxulator) allows an unprivileged user to preload a malicious shared library into set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binaries. Because the P_SUGID flag is not yet set when execve(2) builds the auxiliary vector, AT_SECURE is written as zero, so the Linux runtime loader fails to disable LD_PRELOAD and other unsafe behaviors for privileged binaries. Affects FreeBSD 14.3, 14.4, and 15.0 release branches; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS risk is low (0.14%, 4th percentile).
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Kestra orchestration platform before 1.0.45 and 1.3.21 lets anonymous attackers fully compromise the host. The REST API authentication filter treats any request path ending in /configs as the public instance-config endpoint, so an attacker appending the literal segment configs (e.g. to flow-create or execution-trigger routes) bypasses Basic-Auth, creates a flow with a Shell/Process task, and executes commands as root inside the container; with the default docker-compose mounting /var/run/docker.sock, this pivots to the host Docker daemon. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the technique is fully described in the vendor advisory and is trivially reproducible.
Container-to-host filesystem escape in Incus before 7.2.0 lets a user who can import images and create instances read and write arbitrary files on the host as root. A malicious image carrying a duplicate top-level 'rootfs' symlink (rootfs -> /) passes image validation, and the stopped-container file API later chroots into that symlinked path via forkfile, exposing the host root filesystem through 'incus file pull/push'. A working proof-of-concept is published in the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-2q3f-q5pq-g8wv); publicly available exploit code exists, but there is no public exploit identified beyond the PoC and the CVE is not in CISA KEV.
We need answer JSON only. Need synthesize. Need careful with fields. Let's inspect input. CVE-2026-46619. Description LDAP Injection CWE-90 in MSISDN auth module, unauthenticated remote attacker obtain arbitrary OpenAM session without password in default trusted gateway configuration. Affects OpenAM Community Edition through 16.0.6, patched 16.1.1. CVSS provided: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X. It says CVSS Score 9.3. Need assess own vector in 3.1 and 4.0. Base only maybe. Multi-source: Patch available, reported by github. CPE pkg:maven/... openam-auth-msisdn. Tags: Authentication Bypass, LDAP, Code Injection. References commit, release, GHSA. We need fields. product_name: "OpenAM" or "OpenAM Community Edition"? 1-3 words. Specific product name "OpenAM" or "OpenAM Community Edition". The package is OpenAM. Use "OpenAM Community Edition" maybe 3 words. Fine. summary: Original synthesis, not copy description. Need mention LDAP injection in MSISDN module allows unauthenticated remote login bypass/no password, default trusted gateway (allows all traffic by default), through 16.0.6 patched 16.1.1. No KEV, no POC provided? Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS not provided. Should mention POC? Multi-source has no POC. Public exploit no. Summary should mention no KEV? It says "if actively exploited (KEV), if POC exists, and EPSS risk if notable." None so no mention maybe. But can state no public exploit identified. Start with impact verb+product: "Authentication bypass in OpenAM Community Edition through 16.0.6 allows..." Need avoid "A vulnerability". Good. technical_context: Underlying LDAP search filter concatenation, MSISDN authentication module (mobile subscriber number). CWE-90 LDAP injection. CPE exact affected products: maven org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-auth-msisdn <16.
OS command execution on the Dokku host is possible through the openresty-vhosts plugin in versions prior to 0.38.2, where custom OpenResty include filenames from an app's git repository are interpolated unescaped into a single-quoted shell string that is later run through eval. An attacker who can deploy a Dokku app with the openresty proxy enabled can plant a file whose name contains a single quote to break the quoting and inject a command substitution, executing arbitrary commands as the dokku user on the next deploy. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV, though the upstream advisory and a security regression test document the mechanism precisely.
Remote code execution in Blocksy Companion Pro (the premium add-on plugin for the Blocksy WordPress theme) versions 2.1.45 and earlier allows authenticated users holding only the low-privilege Contributor role to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the host. The flaw, reported by Patchstack and tracked under CWE-94, carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.5 with a changed scope, meaning successful exploitation can impact components beyond the WordPress application itself. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was provided in the source data.
Remote code execution in Revive Adserver is reachable by authenticated low-privilege users who bypass the prior fix for CVE-2026-34916, either by supplying a disallowed-but-valid plugin identifier in the `type` parameter or by abusing the `ox.setChannelTargeting` XML-RPC API method. The flaw lets an attacker inject and execute arbitrary code (CWE-94) on the server, fully compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Reported via HackerOne by multiple researchers (including phucrio and offsetmd); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored code injection in ToolJet self-hosted (prior to 3.20.178-lts) lets any authenticated builder-role user - available on the free tier - overwrite a globally-shared marketplace plugin with arbitrary JavaScript that runs server-side with full Node.js capabilities (require, process). Because the poisoned plugin executes whenever any user on the instance runs a query that uses it, a single low-privileged account achieves remote code execution and an instance-wide supply-chain compromise. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Arbitrary Python code execution in Vim before 9.2.0699 occurs when a victim triggers Python omni-completion (omnifunc) inside a malicious buffer; the python3complete.vim and legacy pythoncomplete.vim runtime plugins reconstruct in-buffer function and class definitions and run them through Python's exec(), inserting each scope's docstring verbatim between triple quotes. Because the docstring is never escaped, a crafted docstring can close the triple-quoted literal and inject attacker-controlled Python that runs with the user's privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but a regression test bundled with the fix demonstrates the breakout, confirming exploitability; EPSS data was not provided.
Remote code execution in the Post Snippets WordPress plugin (versions 4.0.19 and earlier) lets an authenticated user with only Contributor-level privileges inject and execute arbitrary PHP/code on the server via the plugin's snippet-handling functionality (CWE-94). Because a low-privilege role can pivot to full server compromise with a scope change (S:C), this is a privilege-escalation-to-RCE flaw reported by Patchstack; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in the Widget Options WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.2.3, by marketingfire) allows authenticated users holding the low-privileged Contributor role to achieve remote code execution on the host. Because exploitation only requires a Contributor account - a role frequently granted on multi-author and membership sites - an attacker who can register or compromise such an account can run arbitrary PHP and fully take over the site. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the 9.9 CVSS and CWE-94 classification place this at the most severe end of WordPress plugin flaws.
Local privilege escalation / host compromise risk in the Linux kernel arm64 KVM subsystem arises because __kvm_at_s12() (AT instruction emulation) and __kvm_find_s1_desc_level() invoke the stage-1/nested stage-2 page-table walkers walk_s1() and kvm_walk_nested_s2() without holding kvm->srcu, which those walkers require to guard against concurrent memslot changes. A malicious or compromised guest on an affected arm64 host can race memslot updates against these walks, with CVSS scoring confidentiality, integrity and availability all High under a changed scope (host impact). It is patched in stable trees, EPSS is low (0.17%), and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Local privilege-impacting memory corruption in the Linux kernel's Intel ice network driver allows a double-free of a transmit buffer's skb when the TX offload paths fail. When ice_tso() or ice_tx_csum() return an error, ice_xmit_frame_ring() frees the skb but leaves the 'first' tx_buf still marked ICE_TX_BUF_SKB, so a later ice_clean_tx_ring() during interface teardown frees the same skb a second time. Carries a CVSS 3.1 base of 7.8 (AV:L/PR:L), but with a low EPSS of 0.15% (5th percentile), no KEV listing, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Remote denial of service in the Linux kernel arises from a SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock-ordering deadlock in the fasync signaling path (fs/fcntl), where send_sigio() and send_sigurg() take read_lock(&tasklist_lock) from softirq context while traversing a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID). When this collides with a writer spinning on tasklist_lock during fork()/exit(), the CPU can deadlock and hang. The flaw is reachable remotely via TCP URG packets (send_sigurg through NET_RX_SOFTIRQ), affects multiple stable branches, and is fixed by switching the traversal to RCU. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.18%).
Authenticated PHP code injection in the AdRotate Banner Manager WordPress plugin (versions ≤5.17.7) allows Contributor-level users to execute arbitrary PHP on the server by abusing the 'banner' attribute of the [adrotate] shortcode. Exploitation requires W3 Total Cache or Borlabs Cache support to be enabled in AdRotate settings, where unsanitized input is concatenated into a PHP string wrapped in mfunc/fragment cache markers. Reported by Wordfence; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Log injection in upKeeper Instant Privilege Access through 1.6.1 on Windows allows remote unauthenticated attackers to forge, tamper with, or inject crafted entries into application logs by smuggling unneutralized control characters through logged inputs. The flaw (CWE-117) does not directly compromise the upKeeper agent itself but produces high integrity, confidentiality, and availability impact on subsequent log-consuming systems (SIEM, audit pipelines). No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not present in CISA KEV.
Use-after-free in the Linux kernel's netfilter NFQUEUE subsystem affects bridge LOCAL_IN packet handling, where br_pass_frame_up() rewrites skb->dev to the bridge master before queuing without holding a reference on that device. A local attacker who can influence queued bridge traffic and trigger bridge teardown (NETDEV_DOWN) can cause the kernel to re-enter the receive path with a freed bridge master device, yielding a use-after-free with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 7.8). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.19%, 9th percentile).
PHP Object Injection in the Post Duplicator WordPress plugin before 3.0.15 lets authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher inject arbitrary serialized PHP objects by abusing the plugin's post-duplication routine, which copies attacker-controlled custom meta-data without the WordPress meta API's double-serialization safeguard. Successful exploitation can lead to property-oriented programming attacks and, with a suitable gadget chain present, full compromise of the site. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV and carries a low EPSS score (0.15%, 5th percentile).
Trusted measurement-list poisoning in Google go-attestation through 0.6.0 lets a remote actor who controls a TPM event log fed to an attestation verifier inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier's trusted hash database. Because parseEfiSignatureList() never advances past the EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes, those attacker-chosen bytes are accepted as legitimate hash entries, allowing a compromised boot state to be attested as healthy. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the fix is upstream in v0.6.1 and the root cause is documented in GHSA-9r4w-jg96-92mv.
Cross-tenant data injection in the Snipe-IT Accessories API (versions <= 8.6.1) lets a low-privileged authenticated user in one company write persistent accessory records into another company's inventory by supplying a foreign company_id in the API request body. The flaw only manifests when Full Multiple Companies Support (FMCS) is enabled, and it breaks tenant isolation because the API store/update path mass-assigns company_id without the enforcement the web UI applies. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV, but the fix and a regression test are publicly visible in the vendor commit, making the mechanism easy to reproduce.
Authenticated PHP code injection in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier allows a low-privileged user to embed arbitrary PHP into the compiledlimitations database field via the logical parameter of delivery limitations, with execution occurring later during banner delivery. The flaw is exploitable over the network with low complexity and yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 8.8), though no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Authenticated PHP code injection in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier allows a low-privileged user to smuggle an unexpected parameter into the delivery limitations save flow, planting attacker-controlled PHP into the compiledlimitations field that is then evaluated when banners are served. With CVSS 8.8 and a CWE-94 root cause, successful exploitation yields full code execution under the web/ad-delivery process, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV.
Arbitrary JavaScript code execution in the expr-eval npm package affects all released versions when applications pass user-controlled expressions to the toJSFunction() API, which compiles them via new Function() and executes them in the host process context. Snyk discloses no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack pattern (sandbox escape via crafted math expressions) and CVSS 4.0 score of 9.2 make this a high-priority issue for any Node.js or browser application that exposes expr-eval to untrusted input.
Remote code execution in XWiki Pro Macros (com.xwiki.pro:xwiki-pro-macros) versions >=1.13 and <1.14.5 allows any authenticated user with page-edit rights to execute arbitrary Groovy code via the excerpt-include macro, which fails to escape the included page's title and renders excerpt content with the macro's elevated rights. A working proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory demonstrating injection through both a crafted page title and excerpt body. No public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively used, but the publicly available exploit code exists in the advisory itself.
Arbitrary code execution in mise (jdx/mise) versions prior to 2026.3.10 allows attackers to run shell commands as the victim user simply by having them `cd` into a directory containing a malicious `.tool-versions` file. Unlike `.mise.toml`, `.tool-versions` files bypass the trust verification gate in non-paranoid mode, so the Tera template engine's `exec()` function fires silently from the shell `hook-env`. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the detailed reporter PoC, but exploitation is trivial and a working PoC is embedded in the advisory.
Remote code execution in Autodesk Fusion Desktop's MCP (Model Context Protocol) extension allows attackers to execute arbitrary code with current user privileges when a victim visits a malicious webpage while Fusion is running with the MCP extension enabled. The flaw is rated CVSS 9.6 (Critical) due to its network-reachable nature and scope change, though successful exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a crafted page) and the non-default MCP extension being enabled. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution and denial of service in IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty (including IBM i 7.3-7.6) occurs when the WebServer Plug-in component is deployed with Intelligent Management enabled. An attacker who can impersonate a backend application server and return crafted responses can trigger code injection (CWE-94) against the plug-in, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS 0.38% and SSVC exploitation 'none' indicate no observed weaponization despite the 9.8 CVSS rating.
Remote code execution and denial of service in the IBM WebSphere Web Server Plug-in shipped with IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 (through 1.8.4) allows an attacker positioned on the adjacent network to abuse the plug-in's handling of responses from an upstream WebSphere Application Server. By impersonating the application server and returning crafted responses, the attacker can trigger code injection (CWE-94) against the plug-in, leading to full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.25%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully compromise the host by bypassing authentication and abusing improper Python execution isolation. The maximum CVSS 10.0 score (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with scope change) reflects trivial network-based exploitation against any internet-exposed instance, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. IBM has confirmed the issue and released a patch via support advisory node/7277242.
Remote code execution in MISP allows authenticated site administrators to abuse the JsonLogTool NDJSON error log configuration to write attacker-controlled content to a PHP file under the webroot, yielding code execution as the web server user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor patch is available via the MISP GitHub repository.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsite::Client through version 1.1.0 allows attackers controlling metric names or values to inject arbitrary statsite protocol commands by smuggling newlines, colons, and pipe characters that the library fails to sanitize. The flaw maps to CWE-93 (CRLF Injection) and affects any application that forwards untrusted input into metric reporting. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on CISA KEV.
Authenticated remote code execution in Craft CMS versions 5.5.0 through 5.9.13 allows admin users to execute arbitrary PHP by injecting Yii2 event handlers via the fieldLayoutConfig POST parameter to FieldsController::actionRenderCardPreview(). The flaw stems from missing Component::cleanseConfig() sanitization, enabling disclosure of environment variables including database credentials and CRAFT_SECURITY_KEY. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though VulnCheck has published a detailed advisory describing the attack technique.
Remote code execution in Prefect 3.6.23 allows any user holding deployment-creation permissions to run arbitrary commands on shared worker machines by abusing the GitRepository storage class. The commit_sha and directories parameters are concatenated into git invocations without a `--` separator or validation, letting attackers smuggle flags such as `--upload-pack` to execute external programs. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the bug was reported via huntr and is particularly dangerous for multi-tenant work pools where worker compromise crosses trust boundaries.
Code injection in @tinacms/cli versions prior to 2.4.3 allows an attacker who controls a Forestry-style project to achieve remote code execution on a developer's workstation when the `tinacms init` Forestry migration runs and the developer subsequently executes `tinacms dev` or `tinacms build`. The `addVariablesToCode` helper unquotes any value matching the marker `__TINA_INTERNAL__:::(.*?):::` placed in a stringified collection JSON, and user-supplied `label`/`name` fields from `.forestry/**/*.yml` are inserted into that JSON without sanitisation, yielding a top-level IIFE in the generated `tina/templates.ts`. A detailed end-to-end PoC is published in the GHSA-4936-9hrh-qqpw advisory; no public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the disclosure PoC, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV.
Cedar policy injection in CedarJava (com.cedarpolicy:cedar-java) versions below 2.3.6, 3.4.1, and 4.9.0 allows attackers to alter authorization outcomes by smuggling Cedar expressions through unescaped string values. The flaw is in toCedarExpr() on Cedar Value types, which fails to escape quote and backslash characters when serializing user-controlled values into policy text. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the integrity impact is severe because injected fragments like '|| true' can neutralize permit/forbid logic in fine-grained authorization decisions.
Command injection in Rancher Manager’s cluster import endpoint enables remote attackers to deploy malicious containers on downstream Kubernetes clusters using a crafted URL. The vulnerability affects Rancher versions 2.10.0–2.10.12, 2.11.0–2.11.14, 2.12.0–2.12.10, 2.13.0–2.13.6, and 2.14.0–2.14.2, and has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4. No active exploitation has been confirmed, and the EPSS exploitation probability is low at 1.11%, though a vendor-supplied patch is available.
Indirect prompt injection in Eclipse Theia before 1.71.0 allows a malicious repository to automatically override the AI agent's system prompts when a victim opens the workspace, by placing files under .prompts/*.prompttemplate that Theia auto-loads. Combined with built-in AI chat features, the hijacked prompt can chain to data exfiltration via Markdown image rendering or arbitrary command execution via task definitions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Indirect prompt injection in Eclipse Theia versions prior to 1.71.0 allows attackers who control a workspace's filesystem layout to coerce the built-in AI chat agent into executing attacker-supplied instructions, enabling data exfiltration through Markdown image rendering or arbitrary command execution through task definitions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.4 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability once a developer opens an untrusted repository. The flaw is reported by the Eclipse Foundation and fixed in version 1.71.0.
Remote code execution in the piscina Node.js worker pool library allows attackers who pollute Object.prototype.filename to inject a malicious worker script, leading to arbitrary code execution in worker threads and potential data exfiltration. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 4.9.3, 5.0.
Configuration injection in F5 NGINX Gateway Fabric allows an authenticated Kubernetes user with permission to create or modify NginxProxy Custom Resource Definitions to inject arbitrary NGINX directives into generated configuration files via the unsanitized access log format setting. The flaw resides in the control plane configuration generator and affects deployments using NGINX Plus or NGINX Open Source as the data plane. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and CVSS 4.0 rates the impact at 8.6 (High) driven by high confidentiality and integrity loss on the vulnerable system.
Scanner evasion in picklescan versions prior to 1.0.3 lets an attacker smuggle malicious PyTorch pickle payloads past the scan_pytorch detection routine and gain arbitrary code execution when the model is later loaded with torch.load(). The bypass exploits a parser-differential between picklescan's pickletools.genops()-based magic-number extraction and PyTorch's pickle_module.load(), allowing a __reduce__(eval, ('MAGIC_NUMBER',)) trick to produce files that scan as clean but still deserialize correctly. A detailed proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory and the VulnCheck writeup; no CISA KEV listing or EPSS score was supplied in the input.
Remote code execution in python-statemachine 3.0.0 through 3.1.x allows attackers to run arbitrary Python in the host process by supplying a crafted SCXML document whose `<data expr="...">` attributes are passed unsandboxed to eval() inside SCXMLProcessor. Reported by VulnCheck with publicly available exploit code and a vendor advisory (GHSA-v4jc-pm6r-3vj8); no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively in the wild, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Configuration injection in F5 NGINX Gateway Fabric lets an authenticated Kubernetes user who can create or modify NginxProxy or AuthenticationFilter Custom Resources inject arbitrary NGINX directives into generated data-plane configuration. The flaw lives in the control-plane config generator, which renders the serverTokens and extraAuthArgs fields into NGINX templates without escaping, so any tenant holding RBAC rights over these CRDs can rewrite the NGINX Plus config that gets deployed. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.36%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total.
Remote code execution in the Monetizemore Advanced Ads WordPress plugin through version 2.0.21 allows authenticated attackers with low privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code via a code injection flaw (CWE-94). The issue was disclosed by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (high) with high attack complexity. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
LDAP injection in Apache Shiro's DefaultLdapRealm allows remote unauthenticated attackers to manipulate Distinguished Name construction during LDAP bind authentication, potentially bypassing authentication or impersonating other users. The flaw affects all versions through 2.2.0 and 3.0.0-alpha-1 when DefaultLdapRealm is in use, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.8 reflects high integrity impact against an authentication-critical component.
Remote code execution in Blocksy Companion Pro (Creative Themes) versions 2.1.37 and earlier allows authenticated users with Contributor-level WordPress privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.9 with scope change, reflecting that successful exploitation breaks out of the WordPress application context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but Patchstack has catalogued the issue in its WordPress vulnerability database.
Remote code execution in JimuReport 2.3.4 and earlier lets attackers run arbitrary code by injecting AviatorScript expressions into the /jmreport/executeSelectApi endpoint, which forwards user input straight into the Aviator expression engine without validation. The CVSS vector marks it as network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N), giving remote attackers full server compromise. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though a third-party technical writeup exists; EPSS is low (0.47%) and it is not on the CISA KEV list.
Remote code execution in the ACPT (Pro) - Custom Post Types Plugin for WordPress (versions through 2.0.47) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying WordPress host. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 with a scope change (S:C) indicates the flaw escapes the plugin sandbox and compromises the entire WordPress installation. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack profile (network, no auth, no UI) makes this a high-priority patching target.
Arbitrary code execution in Themeco Cornerstone WordPress plugin versions prior to 7.8.8 allows authenticated low-privilege users (Subscriber role) to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The CVSS:3.1 vector indicates a scope-changed network-vector flaw with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though high attack complexity tempers the realistic risk. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API (versions <= 0.8.6) lets attackers escape the computed-fields expression sandbox and run arbitrary OS commands inside the container. The AST validator behind `_safe_eval_expression()` only blocked attribute names beginning with an underscore, so a crafted `JsonCssExtractionStrategy` schema can reach generator/frame attributes (`gi_frame`, `f_back`, `f_builtins`) to recover the real `__import__` and execute code. Because JWT auth is disabled by default, a single `POST /crawl` request suffices; publicly available exploit code exists (SSVC: PoC) and the vendor rates it CVSS 10.0, though EPSS is low at 0.45%.
Remote takeover of Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise CS Campus Community 9.2.38 is possible via the Security component, where an unauthenticated attacker reaching the application over HTTP can fully compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Oracle scores this 8.1 with high attack complexity, indicating non-trivial preconditions rather than a trivial mass-exploit primitive. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Privilege escalation and full takeover of Oracle MySQL Shell's VS Code extension affects version 2026.2.0+9.6.1, allowing a low-privileged remote attacker with HTTP network access to fully compromise the Shell with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Because the CVSS vector indicates a scope change (S:C), successful exploitation propagates impact beyond the Shell itself into adjacent components the extension connects to, such as MySQL servers managed through the VS Code workflow. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the 9.9 base score and 'easily exploitable' wording from Oracle warrant urgent remediation.
Untrusted search path in OpenClaw before 2026.5.2 allows local attackers who can influence a workspace .env file to redirect bundled runtime dependency loading to attacker-controlled paths, resulting in arbitrary code execution during dependency resolution. The STATE_DIRECTORY environment variable is not validated before being used to anchor runtime dependency roots, so a poisoned workspace can execute code in the context of a user who opens it. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in Langflow versions through 1.9.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code on the host by abusing the Shareable Playground (Public Flows) feature. When a flow is shared, the /api/v1/build_public_tmp endpoint accepts user-supplied node code in the JSON payload field data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value and executes it during graph instantiation. Publicly available exploit code exists via the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-v5ff-9q35-q26f, including a working cURL-based PoC.
Arbitrary code execution in vLLM versions prior to 0.22.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to run code on the inference server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM is launched in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). The sole guardrail restricting which activation function classes can be loaded from a model's config.json is implemented with a Python assert, which is stripped at compile time under -O, leaving an unrestricted import gadget directly fed by attacker-controlled data. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor advisory (GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r) and a coordinated huntr.com submission document the issue in detail.
Code injection in NVIDIA NeMo Framework across all supported platforms allows a local attacker with low privileges to execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, disclose sensitive information, and tamper with data. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 with high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in the Filipe Nasc RD Station WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 5.6.0) allows authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code through an improper code-generation control flaw. The issue carries a critical CVSS 3.1 score of 9.9 with a scope-changing impact, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack has catalogued it as a Remote Code Execution vulnerability in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Remote code execution in the Easy Invoice WordPress plugin (versions <= 2.1.19) allows unauthenticated attackers to run arbitrary code on the underlying server via a code injection flaw (CWE-94). The maximum CVSS 10.0 score reflects network reachability, no privileges, no user interaction, and a scope change with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the hosting WordPress site. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial exploitability profile makes weaponization likely once technical details are published by Patchstack.
Remote code execution in the WordPress 'Responsive Slider by MetaSlider' plugin (versions ≤3.106.0) allows authenticated users with Editor-level privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The flaw is tracked as CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code) and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1 because exploitation crosses a scope boundary, but no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in protobufjs-cli pbjs static and static-module code generation allows attacker-influenced JSON descriptor names to be emitted as unsafe JavaScript references in generated output, leading to arbitrary code execution when the generated file is later imported and an affected API path is invoked. This affects npm protobufjs-cli versions <= 1.3.1 and 2.0.0 through 2.4.2, and is an incomplete-fix bypass of CVE-2026-44295 (GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9). At time of analysis, no public exploit identified and no CISA KEV listing, but vendor-released patches exist in 1.3.2 and 2.5.0.
Remote code execution in Vitest Browser Mode (npm @vitest/browser 3.0.0-3.2.4, 4.0.0-4.1.7, 5.0.0-beta.0-5.0.0-beta.3) allows remote attackers to overwrite the project's vite.config.ts and execute arbitrary Node.js code on the host when the browser API server is bound to a network-reachable interface (e.g. --browser.api.host=0.0.0.0). The flaw stems from the cdp() API forwarding raw Chrome DevTools Protocol calls over the browser WebSocket RPC without honoring the allowWrite/allowExec gates that normally restrict Browser Mode. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA-g8mr-85jm-7xhm advisory's step-by-step reproduction, though no CISA KEV listing has been issued.
Remote code execution in Edgar Rojas WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder WordPress plugin (versions through 2.0.8) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code on the host WordPress site. The CVSS 10.0 score with scope change reflects the severe impact: attackers can fully compromise the WordPress instance and potentially pivot beyond it. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) makes mass exploitation likely once details surface.
CSV formula injection in MIA Technology's Pizzy Library (versions 1.0.0.26250 through 1.3.9.26250) allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious formula elements into generated CSV files, leading to code execution when the file is opened in a spreadsheet application. The flaw is rated CVSS 8.8 and was reported by TR-CERT, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Impact spans confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the system of any victim who opens the crafted CSV.
Remote code execution in kanishka-linux Reminiscence v0.3.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by supplying crafted input to the media archiving and export pipeline component. The CVSS 9.8 rating reflects network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS sits at 0.67% (47th percentile) indicating limited observed exploitation pressure so far.
Remote code execution affects remotion-dev's Remotion framework at version 4.0.409, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems running the affected version per CWE-94 code injection semantics. The CVSS 9.8 vector indicates network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation without user interaction, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS probability remains low at 0.25% (16th percentile). The vulnerability is reported by MITRE with a third-party advisory on GitHub but lacks detailed exploitation specifics.
Remote code execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API server (versions prior to 0.9.0) lets unauthenticated attackers run arbitrary commands as the container runtime user. The server passes request-supplied browser_config.extra_args directly into Chromium's launch arguments, enabling argument injection (CWE-88) of a malicious child-process launcher combined with --no-zygote. Because the Docker API is unauthenticated by default and CVSS is scored 10.0, a single crafted HTTP request achieves full container compromise; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Privilege escalation in the Plesk web hosting control panel lets an authenticated low-privileged user abuse an improper authorization flaw in the XML API to inject arbitrary configuration directives, achieving arbitrary file write as root and full compromise of the underlying server. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope change, this turns any valid panel account into root on the host; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Cypher injection in Apache Camel's camel-neo4j producer allows attackers who control JSON key names in the CamelNeo4jMatchProperties map to execute arbitrary Cypher queries against the connected Neo4j database, enabling unauthorized read, modification, or deletion of any node or relationship. The flaw exists across three release streams (4.10.0-4.14.7, 4.15.0-4.18.2, 4.19.0-4.20.x) and is a direct bypass of the partial fix introduced in CVE-2025-66169, which bound property values as query parameters but left property names (JSON keys) concatenated verbatim into the WHERE clause. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, though the prior related CVE in the same producer indicates recurring injection exposure in this component.
Stored/reflected cross-site scripting in the Simple Membership WordPress plugin before 4.7.5 lets unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary JavaScript in a logged-in administrator's browser by abusing the Stripe webhook handler. When no Stripe signing secret is configured, the plugin fails to verify webhook authenticity and then renders an attacker-controlled value unescaped inside an admin notice. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though EPSS remains low at 0.18% and no active exploitation is reported (not in CISA KEV).
Improper input validation (CWE-20) in the camel-aws2-sns component of Apache Camel stems from a missing inbound HeaderFilterStrategy rule on Sns2HeaderFilterStrategy, mirroring the flaw fixed in the sibling camel-aws2-sqs component (CVE-2026-46456). However, camel-aws2-sns is producer-only - Sns2Endpoint throws UnsupportedOperationException on createConsumer - so no externally-supplied SNS message attributes are ever mapped inbound into a Camel Exchange, leaving the missing filter rule unreachable by any attacker. Despite the NVD CVSS 9.8 rating, the vendor explicitly classifies this as a defense-in-depth alignment with no known exploit path, and EPSS scores it at just 0.16% (6th percentile); no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Arbitrary code execution in the NLTK Python library (nltk/nltk 3.9.3 and earlier) allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code when a victim loads a malicious JAR through five Stanford interface wrappers (StanfordPOSTagger, StanfordNERTagger, StanfordParser, StanfordDependencyParser, StanfordNeuralDependencyParser). These classes pass a user-controllable JAR path to an internal java() helper that calls subprocess.Popen() with no SHA256 integrity check, so a substituted or poisoned JAR executes with the user's privileges. This is a regression of CVE-2026-0848, whose SHA256 verification fix was applied only to StanfordSegmenter and never propagated to these five classes; no public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though a huntr bounty report exists.
Local privilege escalation via argument injection in TUBITAK BILGEM's pardus-software (the software-center application for the Turkish Pardus Linux distribution) affects all versions up to and including 1.0.4. A low-privileged local user can smuggle attacker-controlled argument delimiters into a command the application invokes with elevated privileges, yielding full compromise of the host (confidentiality, integrity, and availability all high) with no user interaction. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on CISA KEV; it is fixed in version 1.0.5.
Indirect prompt injection in the Kong Konnect Model Context Protocol (MCP) server (konghq mcp-konnect) before version 1.0.0 allows a remote attacker to smuggle malicious instructions into content that an LLM agent processes, causing the agent to issue unintended Kong Konnect API requests. Because the injected instructions execute with the trust and credentials of the connected agent, an attacker can exfiltrate sensitive Konnect data or drive management API calls the operator never intended. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 7.4 rating (scope-changed, confidentiality-high) reflects meaningful impact once an agent ingests attacker-controlled data.
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Creative Themes' Blocksy Companion Pro WordPress plugin in all versions up to and including 2.1.46, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code (CWE-94) without any authentication or user interaction. Rated CVSS 10.0 with a scope-changed vector, this is a maximum-severity flaw reported by Patchstack. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the trivial exploitability of an unauthenticated RCE makes it a high-priority patching target.
Remote code execution in the Five Star Business Profile and Schema WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.3.19) allows an attacker holding an Editor-level or higher account to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the host. Reported by Patchstack and rated CVSS 9.1 due to its scope-changing impact, the flaw turns a trusted content role into full server compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CWE-94 code-injection root cause makes reliable exploitation straightforward for any authorized high-privilege user.
Authenticated remote code execution in Craft CMS 5.9.0 through 5.9.x allows control panel users with entry-editing permissions to inject unsandboxed Twig code via the HTTP Referer header during entry save operations. Because the signed redirect URL derived from the attacker-controlled Referer is compiled with renderObjectTemplate() instead of the sandboxed renderSandboxedObjectTemplate(), a low-privileged CMS operator can achieve server-side template injection leading to code execution. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the flaw is fixed in Craft CMS 5.10.0.
Remote code execution in the V8 JavaScript engine of Google Chrome before 150.0.7871.46 allows a remote attacker who lures a victim to a crafted HTML page to execute arbitrary code — though notably only within the renderer sandbox rather than achieving full host compromise. Rated CVSS 8.8 and stemming from a code-generation flaw (CWE-94) in V8, it affects all Chrome desktop installations on the vulnerable channel; a fix has shipped, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.
Log injection in Elastic Kibana (fixed in 7.17.15 and 8.11.1) allows an attacker with low-privilege access to embed unneutralized control characters in input that Kibana writes verbatim to its log files; when an operator later views those logs in a terminal that interprets ANSI/control sequences, the injected payload can forge, hide, or rewrite displayed log content. The issue is tracked as CWE-117 (Improper Output Neutralization for Logs) and carries a vendor CVSS of 8.0. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authenticated remote code execution in JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras (firmware 4.8.30.57701411) lets a logged-in attacker plant a shell script in writable JFFS2 persistent storage and invoke it via popen() through the authenticated Anyka config HTTP endpoint, yielding reboot-surviving persistent RCE. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by VulnCheck), though there is no confirmed active exploitation in CISA KEV. The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.7 reflects high attack complexity offset by full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Deserialization of untrusted data in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux allows a low-privileged local attacker to achieve code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. Megatron Bridge is NVIDIA's model-interoperability tooling used to convert and load large-language-model checkpoints in the Megatron/PyTorch training stack, where unsafe object deserialization (CWE-94) lets attacker-controlled serialized data run arbitrary code in the process context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CVSS 7.8 (High) rating with full C/I/A impact makes it a meaningful risk on shared or multi-tenant ML infrastructure.
Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux stems from improper control of code generation (CWE-94), allowing an attacker who convinces a user to process a malicious artifact to run code in the context of the training/inference workload. Successful exploitation can escalate privileges, tamper with data, and disclose information. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R) indicates local access with user interaction is required.
Arbitrary JavaScript execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API server (versions before 0.8.7) lets remote attackers submit code to the /execute_js endpoint, which runs it inside the server's Chromium browser context launched with --disable-web-security. Because the browser's same-origin and CORS protections are disabled, attacker-controlled JavaScript can pivot into server-side request forgery against internal services and metadata endpoints. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.2 (critical), though the vector's high attack complexity and present attack requirements indicate exploitation is not fully trivial.
Remote code execution in txtai through 9.10.0 lets a remote attacker reach the API /reindex endpoint and supply an arbitrary dotted callable (for example subprocess.getoutput) that the server imports and invokes during reindexing, running commands as the server process. The flaw is exploitable only when the API is network-exposed with no TOKEN set (so all endpoints are unauthenticated) and the index is writable - not the default posture. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the issue carries a high CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and was reported by VulnCheck.
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary Python via the flow `tool_code` mechanism, gaining full control of the Langflow process. Because the scope changes (S:C), the attacker can read every process secret, read and tamper with all flows, conversations, messages, uploads and saved components in the database, reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, and pivot across tenants on the same instance. This is a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) flaw, though no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in IBM Db2 11.5.0-11.5.9 and 12.1.0-12.1.4 lets unauthenticated network attackers run arbitrary code by abusing improper handling of the pre-authentication DRDA handshake. Because the flaw is reachable before any login, any client able to reach the database listener can trigger it, and the CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-system commands and read sensitive files such as stored credentials, escalating from low-privileged application access to full host compromise. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope-changing vector, the flaw enables lateral movement once an attacker holds any valid Langflow account. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor patch is available.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Orkes Conductor (conductor-oss) versions 3.21.21 through 3.30.1 lets remote attackers run arbitrary OS commands by POSTing inline workflow definitions to the workflow API before any authentication check. The flaw stems from GraalVM script evaluators left in an unsandboxed state (HostAccess.ALL / allowAllAccess(true)), allowing JavaScript or Python expressions in INLINE, LAMBDA, DO_WHILE, and SWITCH tasks to reach Java reflection and subprocess APIs. Reported by VulnCheck; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though a detailed vendor/researcher advisory exists.
Remote code execution in LLaMA-Factory through version 0.9.5 allows attackers who can reach the Gradio WebUI to run arbitrary Python by entering a malicious model path in the Chat or Training interfaces. Because the app forwards unvalidated user input into Hugging Face's AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained() and AutoModel.from_pretrained() with a hardcoded trust_remote_code=True, a referenced repository's custom modeling code executes with the server process's privileges. Publicly available exploit code exists (a proof-of-concept gist plus a VulnCheck advisory), though it is not listed in CISA KEV and no in-the-wild abuse is documented in the available data.
Arbitrary code execution in Snowflake CLI versions prior to 3.19 lets an attacker run code in the context of any developer who bundles or deploys an attacker-supplied Snowpark project. The flaw lives in the Snowpark annotation processor callback template, where untrusted project content is interpolated directly into generated Python code (CWE-94). No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the attack is straightforward and high-impact (CVSS 8.8) given that it executes with the victim's local privileges; exploitation hinges on the victim running the bundling/deployment workflow against malicious content.
Remote code execution in Alexantr filemanager v1.0 lets remote attackers run arbitrary code through the filemanager.php component, mapped to CWE-94 (code injection). The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a network-reachable flaw requiring no authentication or user interaction, and publicly available exploit code exists (GitHub POC by SLO-CYBER-SEC). SSVC rates exploitation as proof-of-concept with total technical impact and automatable=yes, but it is not on CISA KEV and no EPSS score was provided.
Local privilege escalation in FreeBSD's Linux binary compatibility layer (Linuxulator) allows an unprivileged user to preload a malicious shared library into set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binaries. Because the P_SUGID flag is not yet set when execve(2) builds the auxiliary vector, AT_SECURE is written as zero, so the Linux runtime loader fails to disable LD_PRELOAD and other unsafe behaviors for privileged binaries. Affects FreeBSD 14.3, 14.4, and 15.0 release branches; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS risk is low (0.14%, 4th percentile).
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Kestra orchestration platform before 1.0.45 and 1.3.21 lets anonymous attackers fully compromise the host. The REST API authentication filter treats any request path ending in /configs as the public instance-config endpoint, so an attacker appending the literal segment configs (e.g. to flow-create or execution-trigger routes) bypasses Basic-Auth, creates a flow with a Shell/Process task, and executes commands as root inside the container; with the default docker-compose mounting /var/run/docker.sock, this pivots to the host Docker daemon. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the technique is fully described in the vendor advisory and is trivially reproducible.
Container-to-host filesystem escape in Incus before 7.2.0 lets a user who can import images and create instances read and write arbitrary files on the host as root. A malicious image carrying a duplicate top-level 'rootfs' symlink (rootfs -> /) passes image validation, and the stopped-container file API later chroots into that symlinked path via forkfile, exposing the host root filesystem through 'incus file pull/push'. A working proof-of-concept is published in the GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-2q3f-q5pq-g8wv); publicly available exploit code exists, but there is no public exploit identified beyond the PoC and the CVE is not in CISA KEV.
We need answer JSON only. Need synthesize. Need careful with fields. Let's inspect input. CVE-2026-46619. Description LDAP Injection CWE-90 in MSISDN auth module, unauthenticated remote attacker obtain arbitrary OpenAM session without password in default trusted gateway configuration. Affects OpenAM Community Edition through 16.0.6, patched 16.1.1. CVSS provided: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X. It says CVSS Score 9.3. Need assess own vector in 3.1 and 4.0. Base only maybe. Multi-source: Patch available, reported by github. CPE pkg:maven/... openam-auth-msisdn. Tags: Authentication Bypass, LDAP, Code Injection. References commit, release, GHSA. We need fields. product_name: "OpenAM" or "OpenAM Community Edition"? 1-3 words. Specific product name "OpenAM" or "OpenAM Community Edition". The package is OpenAM. Use "OpenAM Community Edition" maybe 3 words. Fine. summary: Original synthesis, not copy description. Need mention LDAP injection in MSISDN module allows unauthenticated remote login bypass/no password, default trusted gateway (allows all traffic by default), through 16.0.6 patched 16.1.1. No KEV, no POC provided? Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS not provided. Should mention POC? Multi-source has no POC. Public exploit no. Summary should mention no KEV? It says "if actively exploited (KEV), if POC exists, and EPSS risk if notable." None so no mention maybe. But can state no public exploit identified. Start with impact verb+product: "Authentication bypass in OpenAM Community Edition through 16.0.6 allows..." Need avoid "A vulnerability". Good. technical_context: Underlying LDAP search filter concatenation, MSISDN authentication module (mobile subscriber number). CWE-90 LDAP injection. CPE exact affected products: maven org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-auth-msisdn <16.
OS command execution on the Dokku host is possible through the openresty-vhosts plugin in versions prior to 0.38.2, where custom OpenResty include filenames from an app's git repository are interpolated unescaped into a single-quoted shell string that is later run through eval. An attacker who can deploy a Dokku app with the openresty proxy enabled can plant a file whose name contains a single quote to break the quoting and inject a command substitution, executing arbitrary commands as the dokku user on the next deploy. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV, though the upstream advisory and a security regression test document the mechanism precisely.
Remote code execution in Blocksy Companion Pro (the premium add-on plugin for the Blocksy WordPress theme) versions 2.1.45 and earlier allows authenticated users holding only the low-privilege Contributor role to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the host. The flaw, reported by Patchstack and tracked under CWE-94, carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.5 with a changed scope, meaning successful exploitation can impact components beyond the WordPress application itself. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was provided in the source data.
Remote code execution in Revive Adserver is reachable by authenticated low-privilege users who bypass the prior fix for CVE-2026-34916, either by supplying a disallowed-but-valid plugin identifier in the `type` parameter or by abusing the `ox.setChannelTargeting` XML-RPC API method. The flaw lets an attacker inject and execute arbitrary code (CWE-94) on the server, fully compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Reported via HackerOne by multiple researchers (including phucrio and offsetmd); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Stored code injection in ToolJet self-hosted (prior to 3.20.178-lts) lets any authenticated builder-role user - available on the free tier - overwrite a globally-shared marketplace plugin with arbitrary JavaScript that runs server-side with full Node.js capabilities (require, process). Because the poisoned plugin executes whenever any user on the instance runs a query that uses it, a single low-privileged account achieves remote code execution and an instance-wide supply-chain compromise. The flaw carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Arbitrary Python code execution in Vim before 9.2.0699 occurs when a victim triggers Python omni-completion (omnifunc) inside a malicious buffer; the python3complete.vim and legacy pythoncomplete.vim runtime plugins reconstruct in-buffer function and class definitions and run them through Python's exec(), inserting each scope's docstring verbatim between triple quotes. Because the docstring is never escaped, a crafted docstring can close the triple-quoted literal and inject attacker-controlled Python that runs with the user's privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but a regression test bundled with the fix demonstrates the breakout, confirming exploitability; EPSS data was not provided.
Remote code execution in the Post Snippets WordPress plugin (versions 4.0.19 and earlier) lets an authenticated user with only Contributor-level privileges inject and execute arbitrary PHP/code on the server via the plugin's snippet-handling functionality (CWE-94). Because a low-privilege role can pivot to full server compromise with a scope change (S:C), this is a privilege-escalation-to-RCE flaw reported by Patchstack; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in the Widget Options WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.2.3, by marketingfire) allows authenticated users holding the low-privileged Contributor role to achieve remote code execution on the host. Because exploitation only requires a Contributor account - a role frequently granted on multi-author and membership sites - an attacker who can register or compromise such an account can run arbitrary PHP and fully take over the site. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the 9.9 CVSS and CWE-94 classification place this at the most severe end of WordPress plugin flaws.
Local privilege escalation / host compromise risk in the Linux kernel arm64 KVM subsystem arises because __kvm_at_s12() (AT instruction emulation) and __kvm_find_s1_desc_level() invoke the stage-1/nested stage-2 page-table walkers walk_s1() and kvm_walk_nested_s2() without holding kvm->srcu, which those walkers require to guard against concurrent memslot changes. A malicious or compromised guest on an affected arm64 host can race memslot updates against these walks, with CVSS scoring confidentiality, integrity and availability all High under a changed scope (host impact). It is patched in stable trees, EPSS is low (0.17%), and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Local privilege-impacting memory corruption in the Linux kernel's Intel ice network driver allows a double-free of a transmit buffer's skb when the TX offload paths fail. When ice_tso() or ice_tx_csum() return an error, ice_xmit_frame_ring() frees the skb but leaves the 'first' tx_buf still marked ICE_TX_BUF_SKB, so a later ice_clean_tx_ring() during interface teardown frees the same skb a second time. Carries a CVSS 3.1 base of 7.8 (AV:L/PR:L), but with a low EPSS of 0.15% (5th percentile), no KEV listing, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Remote denial of service in the Linux kernel arises from a SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock-ordering deadlock in the fasync signaling path (fs/fcntl), where send_sigio() and send_sigurg() take read_lock(&tasklist_lock) from softirq context while traversing a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID). When this collides with a writer spinning on tasklist_lock during fork()/exit(), the CPU can deadlock and hang. The flaw is reachable remotely via TCP URG packets (send_sigurg through NET_RX_SOFTIRQ), affects multiple stable branches, and is fixed by switching the traversal to RCU. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.18%).
Authenticated PHP code injection in the AdRotate Banner Manager WordPress plugin (versions ≤5.17.7) allows Contributor-level users to execute arbitrary PHP on the server by abusing the 'banner' attribute of the [adrotate] shortcode. Exploitation requires W3 Total Cache or Borlabs Cache support to be enabled in AdRotate settings, where unsanitized input is concatenated into a PHP string wrapped in mfunc/fragment cache markers. Reported by Wordfence; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Log injection in upKeeper Instant Privilege Access through 1.6.1 on Windows allows remote unauthenticated attackers to forge, tamper with, or inject crafted entries into application logs by smuggling unneutralized control characters through logged inputs. The flaw (CWE-117) does not directly compromise the upKeeper agent itself but produces high integrity, confidentiality, and availability impact on subsequent log-consuming systems (SIEM, audit pipelines). No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not present in CISA KEV.
Use-after-free in the Linux kernel's netfilter NFQUEUE subsystem affects bridge LOCAL_IN packet handling, where br_pass_frame_up() rewrites skb->dev to the bridge master before queuing without holding a reference on that device. A local attacker who can influence queued bridge traffic and trigger bridge teardown (NETDEV_DOWN) can cause the kernel to re-enter the receive path with a freed bridge master device, yielding a use-after-free with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 7.8). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.19%, 9th percentile).
PHP Object Injection in the Post Duplicator WordPress plugin before 3.0.15 lets authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher inject arbitrary serialized PHP objects by abusing the plugin's post-duplication routine, which copies attacker-controlled custom meta-data without the WordPress meta API's double-serialization safeguard. Successful exploitation can lead to property-oriented programming attacks and, with a suitable gadget chain present, full compromise of the site. Publicly available exploit code exists (WPScan), though the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV and carries a low EPSS score (0.15%, 5th percentile).
Trusted measurement-list poisoning in Google go-attestation through 0.6.0 lets a remote actor who controls a TPM event log fed to an attestation verifier inject arbitrary SHA256 hashes into the verifier's trusted hash database. Because parseEfiSignatureList() never advances past the EFI_SIGNATURE_LIST SignatureHeaderSize vendor bytes, those attacker-chosen bytes are accepted as legitimate hash entries, allowing a compromised boot state to be attested as healthy. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the fix is upstream in v0.6.1 and the root cause is documented in GHSA-9r4w-jg96-92mv.
Cross-tenant data injection in the Snipe-IT Accessories API (versions <= 8.6.1) lets a low-privileged authenticated user in one company write persistent accessory records into another company's inventory by supplying a foreign company_id in the API request body. The flaw only manifests when Full Multiple Companies Support (FMCS) is enabled, and it breaks tenant isolation because the API store/update path mass-assigns company_id without the enforcement the web UI applies. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV, but the fix and a regression test are publicly visible in the vendor commit, making the mechanism easy to reproduce.
Authenticated PHP code injection in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier allows a low-privileged user to embed arbitrary PHP into the compiledlimitations database field via the logical parameter of delivery limitations, with execution occurring later during banner delivery. The flaw is exploitable over the network with low complexity and yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 8.8), though no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Authenticated PHP code injection in Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier allows a low-privileged user to smuggle an unexpected parameter into the delivery limitations save flow, planting attacker-controlled PHP into the compiledlimitations field that is then evaluated when banners are served. With CVSS 8.8 and a CWE-94 root cause, successful exploitation yields full code execution under the web/ad-delivery process, though there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV.
Arbitrary JavaScript code execution in the expr-eval npm package affects all released versions when applications pass user-controlled expressions to the toJSFunction() API, which compiles them via new Function() and executes them in the host process context. Snyk discloses no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack pattern (sandbox escape via crafted math expressions) and CVSS 4.0 score of 9.2 make this a high-priority issue for any Node.js or browser application that exposes expr-eval to untrusted input.
Remote code execution in XWiki Pro Macros (com.xwiki.pro:xwiki-pro-macros) versions >=1.13 and <1.14.5 allows any authenticated user with page-edit rights to execute arbitrary Groovy code via the excerpt-include macro, which fails to escape the included page's title and renders excerpt content with the macro's elevated rights. A working proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory demonstrating injection through both a crafted page title and excerpt body. No public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively used, but the publicly available exploit code exists in the advisory itself.
Arbitrary code execution in mise (jdx/mise) versions prior to 2026.3.10 allows attackers to run shell commands as the victim user simply by having them `cd` into a directory containing a malicious `.tool-versions` file. Unlike `.mise.toml`, `.tool-versions` files bypass the trust verification gate in non-paranoid mode, so the Tera template engine's `exec()` function fires silently from the shell `hook-env`. No public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the detailed reporter PoC, but exploitation is trivial and a working PoC is embedded in the advisory.
Remote code execution in Autodesk Fusion Desktop's MCP (Model Context Protocol) extension allows attackers to execute arbitrary code with current user privileges when a victim visits a malicious webpage while Fusion is running with the MCP extension enabled. The flaw is rated CVSS 9.6 (Critical) due to its network-reachable nature and scope change, though successful exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a crafted page) and the non-default MCP extension being enabled. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution and denial of service in IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty (including IBM i 7.3-7.6) occurs when the WebServer Plug-in component is deployed with Intelligent Management enabled. An attacker who can impersonate a backend application server and return crafted responses can trigger code injection (CWE-94) against the plug-in, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; EPSS 0.38% and SSVC exploitation 'none' indicate no observed weaponization despite the 9.8 CVSS rating.
Remote code execution and denial of service in the IBM WebSphere Web Server Plug-in shipped with IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 (through 1.8.4) allows an attacker positioned on the adjacent network to abuse the plug-in's handling of responses from an upstream WebSphere Application Server. By impersonating the application server and returning crafted responses, the attacker can trigger code injection (CWE-94) against the plug-in, leading to full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.25%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully compromise the host by bypassing authentication and abusing improper Python execution isolation. The maximum CVSS 10.0 score (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with scope change) reflects trivial network-based exploitation against any internet-exposed instance, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. IBM has confirmed the issue and released a patch via support advisory node/7277242.
Remote code execution in MISP allows authenticated site administrators to abuse the JsonLogTool NDJSON error log configuration to write attacker-controlled content to a PHP file under the webroot, yielding code execution as the web server user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a vendor patch is available via the MISP GitHub repository.
Metric injection in the Perl module Net::Statsite::Client through version 1.1.0 allows attackers controlling metric names or values to inject arbitrary statsite protocol commands by smuggling newlines, colons, and pipe characters that the library fails to sanitize. The flaw maps to CWE-93 (CRLF Injection) and affects any application that forwards untrusted input into metric reporting. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on CISA KEV.
Authenticated remote code execution in Craft CMS versions 5.5.0 through 5.9.13 allows admin users to execute arbitrary PHP by injecting Yii2 event handlers via the fieldLayoutConfig POST parameter to FieldsController::actionRenderCardPreview(). The flaw stems from missing Component::cleanseConfig() sanitization, enabling disclosure of environment variables including database credentials and CRAFT_SECURITY_KEY. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though VulnCheck has published a detailed advisory describing the attack technique.
Remote code execution in Prefect 3.6.23 allows any user holding deployment-creation permissions to run arbitrary commands on shared worker machines by abusing the GitRepository storage class. The commit_sha and directories parameters are concatenated into git invocations without a `--` separator or validation, letting attackers smuggle flags such as `--upload-pack` to execute external programs. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the bug was reported via huntr and is particularly dangerous for multi-tenant work pools where worker compromise crosses trust boundaries.
Code injection in @tinacms/cli versions prior to 2.4.3 allows an attacker who controls a Forestry-style project to achieve remote code execution on a developer's workstation when the `tinacms init` Forestry migration runs and the developer subsequently executes `tinacms dev` or `tinacms build`. The `addVariablesToCode` helper unquotes any value matching the marker `__TINA_INTERNAL__:::(.*?):::` placed in a stringified collection JSON, and user-supplied `label`/`name` fields from `.forestry/**/*.yml` are inserted into that JSON without sanitisation, yielding a top-level IIFE in the generated `tina/templates.ts`. A detailed end-to-end PoC is published in the GHSA-4936-9hrh-qqpw advisory; no public exploit identified at time of analysis beyond the disclosure PoC, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV.
Cedar policy injection in CedarJava (com.cedarpolicy:cedar-java) versions below 2.3.6, 3.4.1, and 4.9.0 allows attackers to alter authorization outcomes by smuggling Cedar expressions through unescaped string values. The flaw is in toCedarExpr() on Cedar Value types, which fails to escape quote and backslash characters when serializing user-controlled values into policy text. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the integrity impact is severe because injected fragments like '|| true' can neutralize permit/forbid logic in fine-grained authorization decisions.
Command injection in Rancher Manager’s cluster import endpoint enables remote attackers to deploy malicious containers on downstream Kubernetes clusters using a crafted URL. The vulnerability affects Rancher versions 2.10.0–2.10.12, 2.11.0–2.11.14, 2.12.0–2.12.10, 2.13.0–2.13.6, and 2.14.0–2.14.2, and has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4. No active exploitation has been confirmed, and the EPSS exploitation probability is low at 1.11%, though a vendor-supplied patch is available.
Indirect prompt injection in Eclipse Theia before 1.71.0 allows a malicious repository to automatically override the AI agent's system prompts when a victim opens the workspace, by placing files under .prompts/*.prompttemplate that Theia auto-loads. Combined with built-in AI chat features, the hijacked prompt can chain to data exfiltration via Markdown image rendering or arbitrary command execution via task definitions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
Indirect prompt injection in Eclipse Theia versions prior to 1.71.0 allows attackers who control a workspace's filesystem layout to coerce the built-in AI chat agent into executing attacker-supplied instructions, enabling data exfiltration through Markdown image rendering or arbitrary command execution through task definitions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.4 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability once a developer opens an untrusted repository. The flaw is reported by the Eclipse Foundation and fixed in version 1.71.0.
Remote code execution in the piscina Node.js worker pool library allows attackers who pollute Object.prototype.filename to inject a malicious worker script, leading to arbitrary code execution in worker threads and potential data exfiltration. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 4.9.3, 5.0.
Configuration injection in F5 NGINX Gateway Fabric allows an authenticated Kubernetes user with permission to create or modify NginxProxy Custom Resource Definitions to inject arbitrary NGINX directives into generated configuration files via the unsanitized access log format setting. The flaw resides in the control plane configuration generator and affects deployments using NGINX Plus or NGINX Open Source as the data plane. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and CVSS 4.0 rates the impact at 8.6 (High) driven by high confidentiality and integrity loss on the vulnerable system.
Scanner evasion in picklescan versions prior to 1.0.3 lets an attacker smuggle malicious PyTorch pickle payloads past the scan_pytorch detection routine and gain arbitrary code execution when the model is later loaded with torch.load(). The bypass exploits a parser-differential between picklescan's pickletools.genops()-based magic-number extraction and PyTorch's pickle_module.load(), allowing a __reduce__(eval, ('MAGIC_NUMBER',)) trick to produce files that scan as clean but still deserialize correctly. A detailed proof-of-concept is published in the GHSA advisory and the VulnCheck writeup; no CISA KEV listing or EPSS score was supplied in the input.
Remote code execution in python-statemachine 3.0.0 through 3.1.x allows attackers to run arbitrary Python in the host process by supplying a crafted SCXML document whose `<data expr="...">` attributes are passed unsandboxed to eval() inside SCXMLProcessor. Reported by VulnCheck with publicly available exploit code and a vendor advisory (GHSA-v4jc-pm6r-3vj8); no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively in the wild, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Configuration injection in F5 NGINX Gateway Fabric lets an authenticated Kubernetes user who can create or modify NginxProxy or AuthenticationFilter Custom Resources inject arbitrary NGINX directives into generated data-plane configuration. The flaw lives in the control-plane config generator, which renders the serverTokens and extraAuthArgs fields into NGINX templates without escaping, so any tenant holding RBAC rights over these CRDs can rewrite the NGINX Plus config that gets deployed. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.36%), but SSVC rates the technical impact as total.
Remote code execution in the Monetizemore Advanced Ads WordPress plugin through version 2.0.21 allows authenticated attackers with low privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code via a code injection flaw (CWE-94). The issue was disclosed by Patchstack and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 (high) with high attack complexity. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
LDAP injection in Apache Shiro's DefaultLdapRealm allows remote unauthenticated attackers to manipulate Distinguished Name construction during LDAP bind authentication, potentially bypassing authentication or impersonating other users. The flaw affects all versions through 2.2.0 and 3.0.0-alpha-1 when DefaultLdapRealm is in use, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.8 reflects high integrity impact against an authentication-critical component.
Remote code execution in Blocksy Companion Pro (Creative Themes) versions 2.1.37 and earlier allows authenticated users with Contributor-level WordPress privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.9 with scope change, reflecting that successful exploitation breaks out of the WordPress application context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but Patchstack has catalogued the issue in its WordPress vulnerability database.
Remote code execution in JimuReport 2.3.4 and earlier lets attackers run arbitrary code by injecting AviatorScript expressions into the /jmreport/executeSelectApi endpoint, which forwards user input straight into the Aviator expression engine without validation. The CVSS vector marks it as network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N), giving remote attackers full server compromise. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though a third-party technical writeup exists; EPSS is low (0.47%) and it is not on the CISA KEV list.
Remote code execution in the ACPT (Pro) - Custom Post Types Plugin for WordPress (versions through 2.0.47) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying WordPress host. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 with a scope change (S:C) indicates the flaw escapes the plugin sandbox and compromises the entire WordPress installation. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack profile (network, no auth, no UI) makes this a high-priority patching target.
Arbitrary code execution in Themeco Cornerstone WordPress plugin versions prior to 7.8.8 allows authenticated low-privilege users (Subscriber role) to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The CVSS:3.1 vector indicates a scope-changed network-vector flaw with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though high attack complexity tempers the realistic risk. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not on the CISA KEV list.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API (versions <= 0.8.6) lets attackers escape the computed-fields expression sandbox and run arbitrary OS commands inside the container. The AST validator behind `_safe_eval_expression()` only blocked attribute names beginning with an underscore, so a crafted `JsonCssExtractionStrategy` schema can reach generator/frame attributes (`gi_frame`, `f_back`, `f_builtins`) to recover the real `__import__` and execute code. Because JWT auth is disabled by default, a single `POST /crawl` request suffices; publicly available exploit code exists (SSVC: PoC) and the vendor rates it CVSS 10.0, though EPSS is low at 0.45%.
Remote takeover of Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise CS Campus Community 9.2.38 is possible via the Security component, where an unauthenticated attacker reaching the application over HTTP can fully compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Oracle scores this 8.1 with high attack complexity, indicating non-trivial preconditions rather than a trivial mass-exploit primitive. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Privilege escalation and full takeover of Oracle MySQL Shell's VS Code extension affects version 2026.2.0+9.6.1, allowing a low-privileged remote attacker with HTTP network access to fully compromise the Shell with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Because the CVSS vector indicates a scope change (S:C), successful exploitation propagates impact beyond the Shell itself into adjacent components the extension connects to, such as MySQL servers managed through the VS Code workflow. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the 9.9 base score and 'easily exploitable' wording from Oracle warrant urgent remediation.
Untrusted search path in OpenClaw before 2026.5.2 allows local attackers who can influence a workspace .env file to redirect bundled runtime dependency loading to attacker-controlled paths, resulting in arbitrary code execution during dependency resolution. The STATE_DIRECTORY environment variable is not validated before being used to anchor runtime dependency roots, so a poisoned workspace can execute code in the context of a user who opens it. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in Langflow versions through 1.9.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary Python code on the host by abusing the Shareable Playground (Public Flows) feature. When a flow is shared, the /api/v1/build_public_tmp endpoint accepts user-supplied node code in the JSON payload field data.nodes[X].data.node.template.code.value and executes it during graph instantiation. Publicly available exploit code exists via the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-v5ff-9q35-q26f, including a working cURL-based PoC.
Arbitrary code execution in vLLM versions prior to 0.22.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to run code on the inference server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM is launched in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). The sole guardrail restricting which activation function classes can be loaded from a model's config.json is implemented with a Python assert, which is stripped at compile time under -O, leaving an unrestricted import gadget directly fed by attacker-controlled data. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor advisory (GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r) and a coordinated huntr.com submission document the issue in detail.
Code injection in NVIDIA NeMo Framework across all supported platforms allows a local attacker with low privileges to execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, disclose sensitive information, and tamper with data. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 with high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Remote code execution in the Filipe Nasc RD Station WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 5.6.0) allows authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code through an improper code-generation control flaw. The issue carries a critical CVSS 3.1 score of 9.9 with a scope-changing impact, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though Patchstack has catalogued it as a Remote Code Execution vulnerability in their WordPress vulnerability database.
Remote code execution in the Easy Invoice WordPress plugin (versions <= 2.1.19) allows unauthenticated attackers to run arbitrary code on the underlying server via a code injection flaw (CWE-94). The maximum CVSS 10.0 score reflects network reachability, no privileges, no user interaction, and a scope change with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the hosting WordPress site. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial exploitability profile makes weaponization likely once technical details are published by Patchstack.
Remote code execution in the WordPress 'Responsive Slider by MetaSlider' plugin (versions ≤3.106.0) allows authenticated users with Editor-level privileges to inject and execute arbitrary code on the underlying server. The flaw is tracked as CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code) and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1 because exploitation crosses a scope boundary, but no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in protobufjs-cli pbjs static and static-module code generation allows attacker-influenced JSON descriptor names to be emitted as unsafe JavaScript references in generated output, leading to arbitrary code execution when the generated file is later imported and an affected API path is invoked. This affects npm protobufjs-cli versions <= 1.3.1 and 2.0.0 through 2.4.2, and is an incomplete-fix bypass of CVE-2026-44295 (GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9). At time of analysis, no public exploit identified and no CISA KEV listing, but vendor-released patches exist in 1.3.2 and 2.5.0.
Remote code execution in Vitest Browser Mode (npm @vitest/browser 3.0.0-3.2.4, 4.0.0-4.1.7, 5.0.0-beta.0-5.0.0-beta.3) allows remote attackers to overwrite the project's vite.config.ts and execute arbitrary Node.js code on the host when the browser API server is bound to a network-reachable interface (e.g. --browser.api.host=0.0.0.0). The flaw stems from the cdp() API forwarding raw Chrome DevTools Protocol calls over the browser WebSocket RPC without honoring the allowWrite/allowExec gates that normally restrict Browser Mode. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA-g8mr-85jm-7xhm advisory's step-by-step reproduction, though no CISA KEV listing has been issued.
Remote code execution in Edgar Rojas WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder WordPress plugin (versions through 2.0.8) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code on the host WordPress site. The CVSS 10.0 score with scope change reflects the severe impact: attackers can fully compromise the WordPress instance and potentially pivot beyond it. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the trivial attack vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) makes mass exploitation likely once details surface.
CSV formula injection in MIA Technology's Pizzy Library (versions 1.0.0.26250 through 1.3.9.26250) allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious formula elements into generated CSV files, leading to code execution when the file is opened in a spreadsheet application. The flaw is rated CVSS 8.8 and was reported by TR-CERT, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Impact spans confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the system of any victim who opens the crafted CSV.
Remote code execution in kanishka-linux Reminiscence v0.3.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by supplying crafted input to the media archiving and export pipeline component. The CVSS 9.8 rating reflects network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS sits at 0.67% (47th percentile) indicating limited observed exploitation pressure so far.
Remote code execution affects remotion-dev's Remotion framework at version 4.0.409, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems running the affected version per CWE-94 code injection semantics. The CVSS 9.8 vector indicates network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation without user interaction, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS probability remains low at 0.25% (16th percentile). The vulnerability is reported by MITRE with a third-party advisory on GitHub but lacks detailed exploitation specifics.