Skip to main content

GeoVision GV-ASWeb CVE-2026-7841

| EUVDEUVD-2026-27546 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-05-06 GV GHSA-94pq-gp68-xccr
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GV
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain System Setting credentials
  2. Delivery
    Access Notification Settings interface
  3. Exploit
    Craft malicious POST to ASWebCommon.srf
  4. Execution
    Bypass frontend validation
  5. Persist
    Inject commands into backend
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires valid authentication credentials with specifically System Setting permissions in GeoVision GV-ASWeb, not just any authenticated user access. This permission level is typically restricted to security system administrators rather than general operators or viewers. Attack targets the Notification Settings feature accessed via the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint. Network access to the GV-ASWeb administrative interface is required (AV:N), but exploitation is limited to environments where the attacker has already obtained administrative credentials or where System Setting permissions are over-provisioned to users who should not have configuration authority. Default GV-ASWeb deployments may not expose the management interface to untrusted networks, further limiting attack surface in properly segmented environments.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (High) accurately reflects the technical severity with network attack vector (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), and complete CIA triad impact (C:H/I:H/A:H). However, real-world risk is substantially mitigated by the PR:L (low privileges required) authentication barrier and the specific requirement for System Setting permissions, which are typically restricted to security administrators rather than general users. The vulnerability cannot be exploited by unauthenticated attackers or standard authenticated users without elevated permissions. EPSS exploitation probability data is not available in the input, preventing quantitative assessment of exploitation likelihood. No CISA KEV listing exists, indicating no confirmed active exploitation. No public POC is identified in available references. The single vendor advisory reference suggests controlled disclosure rather than widespread public attention. SSVC framework assessment: exploitation status is none confirmed, automation potential is high given network access and low complexity once authenticated, technical impact is total system compromise within the application's privilege context. Priority should focus on environments where GV-ASWeb administrative access is broadly distributed or where insider threat risk is elevated, rather than treating as an internet-wide critical emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated attacker with System Setting permissions (such as a malicious insider, compromised administrator account, or attacker who has escalated privileges through separate vulnerabilities) crafts a malicious HTTP POST request to the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint within the Notification Settings functionality. By manipulating parameters to include command injection payloads and bypassing frontend validation that would normally restrict input, the attacker achieves arbitrary command execution on the GV-ASWeb server with the privileges of the web application process, potentially gaining full control over the access control management system, extracting surveillance data, manipulating access permissions, or pivoting to connected physical security infrastructure.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 06, 2026

Remote code execution in GeoVision GV-ASWeb 6.2.0 allows authenticated users with System Setting permissions to execute arbitrary commands by bypassing frontend restrictions through crafted HTTP POST requests to the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint. This authenticated network-accessible vulnerability achieves full system compromise (confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact) with low attack complexity. No public exploit code or active exploitation confirmed at time of analysis, though EPSS data unavailable for risk contextualization.

RemediationAI

Consult the official GeoVision security advisory at https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php for vendor-released patches or updated versions addressing CVE-2026-7841. The advisory should specify the exact patched version to upgrade to from vulnerable GV-ASWeb 6.2.0 installations. Until patching is complete, implement compensating controls: restrict System Setting permissions to the minimum number of trusted administrators required for operational necessity, implement network segmentation to limit GV-ASWeb administrative interface access to dedicated management networks rather than general corporate or internet-accessible networks, enable comprehensive audit logging for all ASWebCommon.srf endpoint requests to detect potential exploitation attempts, and consider implementing web application firewall rules to inspect POST requests to ASWebCommon.srf for command injection patterns (though bypass potential exists given backend validation failures). Note that restricting administrative permissions may impact legitimate configuration management workflows and requires coordination with physical security operations teams.

Affected VersionsENISA

ASManager V6.2.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

GV-ASWeb is GeoVision's access control and security management web interface, part of their ASManager suite for managing surveillance and access control systems. The vulnerability stems from CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection), where the backend endpoint ASWebCommon.srf fails to properly validate or sanitize input in the Notification Settings functionality. The application architecture relies on frontend restrictions to prevent command injection, but the backend lacks independent input validation, allowing authenticated users to craft malicious POST requests that bypass client-side controls and inject arbitrary commands directly into server-side execution contexts. The affected product identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:asmanager indicates this is part of GeoVision's broader access management platform, typically deployed in enterprise physical security environments.

Know when Asmanager gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GV) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (GV) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: GV

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Notification Settings on GeoVision GV-ASWeb 6.2.0. An authenticated user with System Setting permissions can execute arbitrary commands on the server by sending a crafted HTTP POST request to the ASWebCommon.srf backend endpoint to bypass the frontend restrictions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

GeoVision GV-ASWeb 6.2.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary system commands and achieve full compromise of affected surveillance systems. Organizations running this product face immediate risk of unauthorized system takeover if privileged accounts are compromised or insider threats exist, with no vendor patch currently available to remediate the underlying flaw.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to GeoVision administrative interfaces using firewall rules and VPN requirements; (2) Enforce strict role-based access control, limiting System Setting permissions to essential personnel only; (3) Implement multi-factor authentication for all administrative accounts; (4) Monitor and log all POST requests to ASWebCommon.srf endpoint; (5) Deploy web application firewall rules to detect and block malformed HTTP POST requests matching known RCE patterns; (6) Maintain isolated backup systems not connected to production GeoVision instances.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 42% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy