Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to PraisonAI application
-
DeliveryCraft malicious collection name with SQL/CQL injection payload
-
ExploitSubmit collection name to knowledge-store operation endpoint
-
ExecutionInjected SQL/CQL executes in database
-
ImpactAttacker exfiltrates, modifies, or deletes data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires: (1) PraisonAI deployed with SQL or CQL knowledge-store backends explicitly enabled and configured; (2) Authenticated user access to the application (PR:L from CVSS); (3) Application or API endpoint that accepts collection name as user input and passes it to PraisonAI knowledge-store operations without prior validation; (4) The attacker must have network access to the application (AV:N). Exploitation is NOT possible if PraisonAI uses default in-memory or document-based storage, if collection names are hardcoded and never derived from user input, or if input validation is performed at the application layer before passing to PraisonAI. Default configurations of PraisonAI may not enable SQL/CQL backends, making this low-risk for minimal deployments, but any production system accepting user-supplied collection names and using optional SQL/CQL storage is vulnerable. |
| Impact | CVSS 6.3 indicates moderate risk with network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and low privileges required (PR:L), but CVSS score alone understates real-world impact because SQL/CQL injection typically enables complete database compromise. The authenticated requirement (PR:L) significantly limits attack surface compared to unauthenticated vectors - only users with application access can exploit this. However, once authenticated, exploitation is trivial and results in confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts (CIL). EPSS data unavailable, but the simplicity of SQL injection exploitation combined with the moderate CVSS score suggests this is a real priority for organizations running PraisonAI with SQL/CQL backends and accepting untrusted collection names from users or external systems. The fact that this only affects optional backends means some deployments may be unaffected if using different storage mechanisms. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user of a PraisonAI application submits a collection name containing SQL injection payload such as |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 08, 2026
SQL and CQL injection vulnerability in PraisonAI multi-agent teams system versions 2.4.1 through 4.6.33 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL or CQL commands by injecting malicious collection names into knowledge-store implementations. The vulnerability affects applications that pass untrusted collection names to optional SQL/CQL-backed storage backends, enabling data exfiltration, modification, or deletion with low complexity exploitation.
RemediationAI
Upgrade PraisonAI to version 4.6.34 or later, which patches the vulnerability by validating and properly handling collection name inputs. Organizations unable to immediately upgrade should disable SQL/CQL-backed knowledge stores and use alternative storage backends (in-memory or document-based) until patching is feasible. As a compensating control, restrict collection name inputs to allowlisted values containing only alphanumeric characters and underscores, enforced at the application layer before passing to PraisonAI APIs - this mitigates injection but reduces flexibility and requires code changes. Additionally, enforce least-privilege database access at the database level, ensuring PraisonAI's database user has minimal required permissions (e.g., read-only if knowledge-store is read-only), which limits damage from successful SQL injection. See https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-3643-7v76-5cj2 for patch confirmation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in pypi
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
PraisonAI implements optional knowledge-store backends using SQL and CQL (Cassandra Query Language) databases. These backends construct table and index identifiers by concatenating user-supplied name and collection arguments without proper input validation or parameterized queries. The root cause is improper input validation (CWE-20) of collection names before they are incorporated into dynamic SQL/CQL statement construction, allowing attackers to break out of the intended identifier context and inject arbitrary SQL or CQL syntax. This affects the SQL and CQL storage implementations specifically, not the default in-memory or document-based stores.
Know when Praisonai gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionGitHub Advisory
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From version 2.4.1 to before version 4.6.34, PraisonAI exposes optional SQL/CQL-backed knowledge-store implementations that build table and index identifiers from unvalidated name and collection arguments. Applications that pass untrusted collection names into these backends can trigger SQL or CQL injection. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.34.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote code execution in PraisonAI before 1.6.78 allows attackers to run arbitrary Python on the host by manipulating th
PraisonAI's TypeScript MCP server (npm package `praisonai`, versions 1.5.0 through 1.7.1) exposes an HTTP JSON-RPC trans
WebSocket origin-validation bypass in PraisonAI's Browser Server (praisonai/browser/server.py) before 4.6.58 lets an att
PraisonAI's `praisonai serve` subsystem (agents and unified modes) accepts an `--api-key` CLI flag that is parsed but ne
System prompt extraction and unauthorized tool invocation in PraisonAI before 4.6.78 arise because the prompt-injection
Unauthenticated remote agent invocation in PraisonAI versions 4.6.34 through 4.6.57 allows any network-reachable caller
SSRF protection bypass in PraisonAI's praisonaiagents library (all versions before 1.6.58) lets low-privileged users rou
Server-side request forgery in PraisonAI's Crawl4AI/Chromium crawling backend (all versions before 1.6.78) lets low-priv
Authentication fail-open in PraisonAI's Recipe HTTP server allows unauthenticated remote attackers to invoke recipe exec
Authentication bypass in PraisonAI's AgentServer component exposes all routes - /publish, /events, /info, /health - to u
Arbitrary Python code execution in PraisonAI's workflow include feature allows an attacker who controls a local recipe d
Server-side request forgery in PraisonAI's web_crawl() function (versions 1.5.128-1.6.57) allows an attacker who can inf
EUVD-2026-28640
GHSA-3643-7v76-5cj2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB