Skip to main content

Microsoft Windows Search EUVDEUVD-2026-99921

| CVE-2026-83574 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-8mqr-7w2g-c568
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Trigger operation in Windows Search component
  3. Exploit
    Force use-after-free on freed object
  4. Execution
    Groom heap to control reused memory
  5. Persist
    Execute code in elevated context
  6. Impact
    Gain full SYSTEM-level privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated, low-privileged local code-execution on the host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or network path and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The flaw lives in the Windows Search component, so the attacker must be able to invoke or influence Search operations to trigger the use-after-free. The key limiting factor is AC:H: the use-after-free depends on winning a timing race or reaching a precise freed-memory state, so exploitation is not guaranteed on a single attempt and is not automatable (SSVC Automatable=no). Scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning impact is confined to the local Windows system. This primarily raises risk on shared/multi-user systems (e.g., RDS/terminal servers) where untrusted low-privilege accounts exist.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a genuine but non-urgent local privilege-escalation issue rather than a mass-exploitation threat. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0) requires local access and already-held low privileges, and crucially sets AC:H - characteristic of a use-after-free (CWE-416) that depends on winning a race or achieving a specific heap state, which reduces reliability. The CISA SSVC framework corroborates low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (matching AV:L/AC:H), though Technical Impact=total aligns with the C:H/I:H/A:H full-compromise outcome once exploited. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicator, so this is not a confirmed in-the-wild threat. EPSS is not provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quoted. Net: a real priority for comprehensive patch cycles on Windows endpoints (especially multi-user/terminal servers where untrusted low-priv users exist), but it is not a drop-everything issue - the local-only vector, high attack complexity, and absence of active exploitation place it below internet-facing or wormable flaws.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged but authenticated local user (or malware already running in a standard user context) triggers a use-after-free in the Windows Search component by manipulating its operations to reuse freed memory, then grooms the heap to gain code execution in a higher-privileged context. Because the CVSS vector sets AC:H, the attacker must reliably win a race or reach a specific memory state, so exploitation may require multiple attempts. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Microsoft Windows Search component allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a host to raise their privileges on that machine by triggering a use-after-free during Search operations. Exploitation is gated by a hard timing/reachability condition (AC:H) and is not automatable, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, so this presents as a genuine but non-urgent local escalation issue rather than a mass-exploitation threat. Impact is confined to the local Windows system (S:U) but is high across confidentiality, integrity, and availability once achieved, making shared multi-user hosts the primary concern.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches are available: apply the Microsoft security update referenced in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83574, deploying at minimum the fixed builds identified in the EUVD data - Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231 and 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711; Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807; Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376; Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612; Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761; Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650; Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434; and Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470. Prioritize multi-user and shared hosts (RDS/terminal servers, VDI pools, jump boxes, and any system where untrusted low-privilege accounts can log on locally), since the attack requires only an existing low-privileged local foothold. Because no public exploit has been identified and SSVC records exploitation as none with Automatable=no, this can normally be handled on the standard monthly patch cadence rather than an emergency out-of-band deployment. If patching must be deferred, the most direct compensating control is to stop and disable the Windows Search service (WSearch) on at-risk hosts, which removes the vulnerable code path; the trade-off is loss of Start menu and File Explorer search, Outlook and Windows.edb indexing, and any application that queries the index, so this is typically acceptable only on server roles that do not depend on search. Complementary hardening includes restricting interactive logon and local code execution for untrusted users (AppLocker/WDAC policies, removal of unnecessary local accounts), while recognizing that these controls reduce but do not eliminate the risk once an attacker already holds local code execution.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-416, Use After Free: a memory object managed by the Windows Search indexing and query pipeline is released while a reference to it is still reachable, so a subsequent Search-triggered operation dereferences freed heap memory. Windows Search (the WSearch service, with SearchIndexer, SearchProtocolHost and SearchFilterHost processes) runs at elevated integrity and hosts index, query, and filter-handler logic; a lifetime or reference-counting defect in that component lets a low-privileged local caller influence an object's free/reuse ordering and then corrupt or redirect memory that is later consumed in a privileged context. The high attack complexity reflects the need to win a heap timing race or land a precise freed-memory state, which is why the SSVC assessment marks the issue as not automatable even though technical impact is rated total. The affected technology stack is entirely local - there is no network protocol or user-interaction vector required (AV:L, UI:N, PR:L) - and because scope is unchanged, any successful exploitation stays within the local Windows security boundary. Per the ENISA EUVD inventory, the flaw spans the Windows Search code base shared across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 (including Server Core installations), indicating a long-lived, common component rather than a version-specific regression.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only use-after-free (AV:L) exploitable by an existing low-privileged user (PR:L) but gated by a race/heap-state condition (AC:H); successful EoP yields full system compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Search can let an attacker who already has low-privileged code execution on a Windows host elevate control of that machine, putting the host's confidentiality, integrity, and availability at high risk once exploited. Because exploitation depends on a difficult timing condition, is not automatable, and has no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the immediate risk is concentrated on shared multi-user Windows systems rather than broad, opportunistic compromise. Leadership should treat this as a patch-prioritization issue for high-value hosts and a monitoring concern for local privilege changes.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Search ships in all supported Windows client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy