Skip to main content

Windows DHCP Server EUVDEUVD-2026-99863

| CVE-2026-70069 HIGH
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-rwmw-4fvc-m262
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege network access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious DHCP packets
  3. Exploit
    Trigger stack buffer overflow in DHCP Server
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary code as service account
  5. Impact
    Compromise core network infrastructure

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The target must be running the Windows DHCP Server role (not a default role on every Windows Server, but common in enterprise domains) on an unpatched build within the affected ranges (e.g., Server 2016 <10.0.14393.9612, Server 2019 <10.0.17763.9376, Server 2022 <10.0.20348.5761, Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33650, Server 2012/2012 R2, and Windows 10 1607/1809). Exploitation is network-based (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), but requires pre-existing low-level privileges (PR:L) - the attacker must already be authenticated or hold a network foothold, which is the primary limiting factor. CISA SSVC marks the flaw as not automatable, indicating exploitation is not trivially scalable and likely requires deliberate targeting.

Impact

This is a genuinely serious flaw but not an immediate emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation by an attacker who already holds some privileges (PR:L), yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with remote code execution in the DHCP Server service and the 8.8 score. However, the risk signals point to lower real-world urgency than the base score alone implies: CISA's SSVC decision framework reports Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, while Technical Impact=total agrees with the RCE claim. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The PR:L requirement is the key mitigating factor - this is not an unauthenticated internet worm scenario; an attacker must first possess valid network credentials or a foothold. Net: a high-priority patch for organizations running the Windows DHCP Server role (RCE on a core network service), but current exploitation probability appears low and targeted rather than mass/automatable per SSVC.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained low-privilege authenticated network access (e.g., a standard domain account or a foothold on an internal host) sends specially crafted DHCP traffic to a vulnerable Windows DHCP Server, overflowing a stack buffer in the service to execute arbitrary code in its context. Because the DHCP service typically runs with high privileges on a core infrastructure server, successful exploitation can lead to full server compromise. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and SSVC rates the flaw as not automatable, implying any attack would be deliberate and hands-on.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows DHCP Server allows an authenticated attacker with low-level network privileges to run arbitrary code on unpatched Windows Server and Windows 10 systems where the DHCP Server service is present. The flaw is network-reachable, low-complexity, and needs no user interaction, but PR:L means the attacker must already have an authenticated foothold; CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none and not automatable, and no public exploit code is identified at time of analysis. Vendor patches are available, making this a serious flaw to prioritize on exposed DHCP servers rather than an immediate emergency.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft update guide for CVE-2026-70069; fixed build thresholds include Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 Version 1607 at 10.0.14393.9612 or later, Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 Version 1809 at 10.0.17763.9376 or later, Windows Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.5761 or later, Windows Server 2025 at 10.0.26100.33650 or later, Windows Server 2012 R2 at 6.3.9600.23470 or later, and Windows Server 2012 at 6.2.9200.26434 or later. If patching must be delayed, disable the DHCP Server role on systems that do not require it, and where DHCP is required restrict network reachability to trusted relay agents and management subnets; trade-offs are that disabling DHCP breaks address assignment and network restrictions can disrupt legitimate DHCP clients or relays. Review the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70069 for deployment guidance and prioritize exposed DHCP servers.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-121 describes a stack-based buffer overflow, where input larger than an allocated stack buffer overwrites adjacent memory, including control data, allowing an attacker to redirect execution. Windows DHCP Server is the Microsoft service that leases IP addresses and configuration to network clients; processing a crafted network request against an unpatched service can corrupt stack memory and lead to code execution in the context of the DHCP Server service. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates remote reachability, low attack complexity, no user interaction, and low privileges required, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No CPE strings were provided in the input, but EUVD affected ranges identify the issue across multiple Windows Server builds, including Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, 2025, and Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809; the DHCP Server role must be present and unpatched for exploitation.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

DHCP is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity; 'authorized attacker' maps to PR:L, no user interaction, and RCE in the service yields full C/I/A with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows DHCP Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows Server and Windows 10 systems running the DHCP Server service are exposed to a high-severity memory corruption flaw that allows an attacker with an existing low-privilege network account to execute arbitrary code on the host. Because DHCP underpins address allocation for entire network segments, a compromise could disrupt connectivity for every user and device on affected subnets and provide a foothold for lateral movement. Leadership should care because the impacted service is shared infrastructure, so the blast radius extends well beyond the server itself, though exploitation currently requires an authenticated foothold and no public exploit has been identified.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 41% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Windows DHCP Server role is common across enterprise Windows Server fleets
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy