Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local Windows session
-
ExploitSupply crafted input to PowerShell
-
ExecutionTrigger integer overflow and heap corruption
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to already have an authenticated, low-privilege local session on an affected Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2) or Windows Server 2022/2025 host (AV:L, PR:L) and the ability to invoke the vulnerable PowerShell code path with attacker-controlled input that triggers the integer overflow. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special non-default feature toggle is indicated - PowerShell is present by default on all affected editions. The primary limiting factor is the local-access and prior-authentication prerequisite: this cannot be exploited remotely or by an unauthenticated actor, which materially narrows the threat to post-foothold scenarios such as shared systems, lateral movement, or privilege escalation. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a LOCAL (AV:L) attack requiring existing low-privilege authentication (PR:L) with low complexity and no user interaction, yielding total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact within an unchanged scope. The CISA SSVC framework corroborates this profile: Technical Impact is 'total' (consistent with C:H/I:H/A:H and arbitrary code execution), but Exploitation is 'none' and Automatable is 'no' - meaning no observed exploitation and the local, non-wormable nature limits mass automation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score was provided, so no probabilistic exploitation signal is available; absence of EPSS is a data gap, not evidence of low risk. The signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting: a local, authenticated code-execution flaw with total impact that is not currently exploited. The practical consequence is privilege/integrity escalation on a host where the attacker already has a foothold, so this matters most for shared, multi-user, or hardened-workstation Windows environments and should be patched on normal-to-expedited cycles rather than treated as an active-exploitation fire drill. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (AV:L/PR:L) supplies specially crafted input to a vulnerable PowerShell code path, triggering an integer overflow (CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow) that corrupts heap memory. By controlling the overflow, the attacker executes arbitrary code in the context of the vulnerable process, escalating beyond their initial privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required once local access is obtained. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Authenticated local code execution in Windows PowerShell affects Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2) and Windows Server 2022/2025, where a heap buffer overflow triggered by crafted input lets a low-privilege local user run code at the level of the PowerShell process. CVSS 3.1 rates it 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact), and because the vector requires an existing local interactive session, the practical exposure is privilege escalation or post-foothold activity on shared hosts rather than a remote or unauthenticated attack. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', and Microsoft has released fixed builds through the MSRC update guide.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released updates from the Microsoft Security Response Center advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70052, which raise affected systems to the fixed builds identified in the EUVD data: Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231 and 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, and Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) to 10.0.26100.33650 and Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761; standard monthly cumulative servicing carries these fixes. Because exploitation requires an already-authenticated local session (AV:L/PR:L, no user interaction), the highest-value compensating controls are reductions in local attack surface: enforce least-privilege so non-administrative users cannot log on interactively to sensitive servers, remove unnecessary local interactive logon rights, and restrict which accounts may run PowerShell on shared or jump hosts, accepting that this breaks legitimate administrative scripting for those accounts. Deploying Windows Defender Application Control or AppLocker in allow-list mode, or PowerShell Constrained Language Mode and Just Enough Administration endpoints, limits what a successfully triggered payload can do after code execution, at the cost of blocking unsigned scripts and some module-based automation. Script-block logging and PowerShell operational logging via the MSRC guidance improve detection but do not prevent the overflow, and no network-level control applies here since the vulnerability is not remotely triggerable.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 8 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a memory-safety defect in Windows PowerShell, rooted in the heap-based buffer overflow class (CWE-122) with an integer overflow or wraparound as the triggering mechanism: attacker-supplied input reaches a length or size calculation that wraps, producing an undersized heap allocation that is then written past its boundary. Windows PowerShell is built on the .NET runtime and ships by default on every affected desktop and server edition, so the vulnerable code path is reachable without enabling any optional feature. Exploitation requires local execution context and prior authentication (CVSS AV:L, PR:L), with no user interaction (UI:N); the resulting out-of-bounds write can corrupt adjacent heap metadata or attacker-influenced objects, which is why the assessed impact is total across confidentiality, integrity and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) under an unchanged scope. CISA's SSVC decision point of 'Technical Impact: total' reflects that full loss of the affected component is credible once the overflow is reliably triggered, while 'Automatable: no' and 'Exploitation: none' indicate the precondition of a local authenticated session and the current absence of observed or automated exploitation.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local code execution by an already-authorized attacker gives AV:L and PR:L; low complexity (AC:L) and total code execution justify C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows PowerShell allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity heap buffer overflow in Windows PowerShell-affecting Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2) and Windows Server 2022/2025-allows an authenticated local user to execute code at the privilege level of the PowerShell process. Because exploitation requires an existing local interactive session, organizational risk is concentrated on shared workstations, jump boxes, and multi-user servers where a low-privilege foothold can be escalated to broader system compromise. Leadership should prioritize patching these platforms to prevent post-foothold privilege escalation and protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99602
GHSA-495q-62xq-w96x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB